0.04(0.05%) Volume: 886,488 4:02PM EDT| Market Cap : 6.99 B | Enterprise Value : 6.03 B | P/E (TTM) : | P/B : 2.08 |
|---|
RL has been successfully added to your Stock Email Alerts list.
You can manage your stock email alerts here.
RL has been removed from your Stock Email Alerts list.
Please enter Portfolio Name for new portfolio.
GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companys financial situation is. It is based on these factors
1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.
A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash-to-Debt | 2.57 |
RL's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 765 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. RL: 2.57 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only. |
RL'
s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18 Med: 1.39 Max: No Debt Current: 2.57 |
| Equity-to-Asset | 0.58 |
RL's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
51% of the 756 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. RL: 0.58 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only. |
RL'
s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46 Med: 0.63 Max: 0.73 Current: 0.58 |
| Debt-to-Equity | 0.18 |
RL's Debt-to-Equity is ranked higher than
67% of the 560 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. RL: 0.18 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only. |
RL'
s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0 Med: 0.18 Max: 0.62 Current: 0.18 |
| Debt-to-EBITDA | 1.85 |
RL's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
51% of the 552 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.86 vs. RL: 1.85 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only. |
RL'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22 Med: 0.49 Max: 4.01 Current: 1.85 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.84 |
RL's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
91% of the 660 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 42.45 vs. RL: 1.84 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only. |
RL'
s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.84 Med: 43.29 Max: 62 Current: 1.84 |
| Piotroski F-Score: 5 |
|
| Altman Z-Score: 4.61 |
|
| Beneish M-Score: -3.48 |
|
| WACC vs ROIC |
1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Margin % | 0.41 |
RL's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
77% of the 764 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. RL: 0.41 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only. |
RL'
s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.42 Med: 13.9 Max: 16.23 Current: 0.41 |
| Net Margin % | -0.28 |
RL's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
77% of the 764 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 3.85 vs. RL: -0.28 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only. |
RL'
s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.49 Med: 9.42 Max: 10.8 Current: -0.28 |
| ROE % | -0.51 |
RL's ROE % is ranked lower than
78% of the 757 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 7.58 vs. RL: -0.51 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only. |
RL'
s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.82 Med: 17.7 Max: 20.17 Current: -0.51 |
| ROA % | -0.30 |
RL's ROA % is ranked lower than
77% of the 772 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 3.86 vs. RL: -0.30 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only. |
RL'
s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.67 Med: 11.09 Max: 13.84 Current: -0.3 |
| ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % | 1.44 |
RL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
77% of the 770 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 14.74 vs. RL: 1.44 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only. |
RL'
s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.33 Med: 54.77 Max: 68.42 Current: 1.44 |
| 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate | -0.20 |
RL's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 708 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. RL: -0.20 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only. |
RL'
s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.2 Med: 11.9 Max: 18.8 Current: -0.2 |
| 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate | -44.20 |
RL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
96% of the 604 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. RL: -44.20 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only. |
RL'
s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.2 Med: 11 Max: 28.1 Current: -44.2 |
| Ray Dalio 21,400 sh (New) Murray Stahl 4,631 sh (+12.02%) Mason Hawkins 3,133,039 sh (+11.81%) Keeley Asset Management Corp 11,176 sh (+10.92%) Joel Greenblatt 131,761 sh (+9.33%) Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,187,559 sh (+1.13%) | Ron Baron 30,000 sh (unchged) Martin Whitman 245,465 sh (unchged) | Scott Black Sold Out Third Avenue Management 270,116 sh (-0.66%) Paul Tudor Jones 8,912 sh (-41.40%) Jim Simons 65,300 sh (-86.07%) |
| Chuck Royce 35,500 sh (New) Charles de Vaulx 617,728 sh (New) Francisco García Paramés 58,203 sh (New) Paul Tudor Jones 28,356 sh (+218.18%) Joel Greenblatt 272,293 sh (+106.66%) Third Avenue Management 360,653 sh (+33.52%) Murray Stahl 5,203 sh (+12.35%) | Martin Whitman 245,465 sh (unchged) | Ron Baron Sold Out Ray Dalio 8,336 sh (-61.05%) Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 225,936 sh (-80.97%) Jim Simons 8,100 sh (-87.60%) Mason Hawkins 13,600 sh (-99.57%) |
| Steven Cohen 23,900 sh (New) Ray Dalio 317,058 sh (+3703.48%) Jim Simons 227,200 sh (+2704.94%) Francisco García Paramés 100,139 sh (+72.05%) Chuck Royce 39,600 sh (+11.55%) Murray Stahl 5,584 sh (+7.32%) Martin Whitman 305,065 sh (+24.28%) | Zeke Ashton 30,000 sh (unchged) Charles de Vaulx 617,728 sh (unchged) | Mason Hawkins Sold Out Third Avenue Management 359,546 sh (-0.31%) Paul Tudor Jones 23,331 sh (-17.72%) Joel Greenblatt 188,979 sh (-30.60%) Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2,386 sh (-98.94%) |
(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)
| Guru | Date | Trades | Impact to Portfolio | Price Range * (?) | Current Price | Change from Average | Current Shares | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Avenue Management | 2017-06-30 | Reduce -0.31% | $66.11 - $84.05 | $ 86.01 | 14% | 359,546 |  | |
| Joel Greenblatt | 2017-06-30 | Reduce -30.60% | 0.09% | $66.11 - $84.05 | $ 86.01 | 14% | 188,979 | |
| Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss | 2017-06-30 | Reduce -98.94% | 0.03% | $66.11 - $84.05 | $ 86.01 | 14% | 2,386 | |
| Mason Hawkins | 2017-06-30 | Sold Out | 0.01% | $66.11 - $84.05 | $ 86.01 | 14% | 0 | |
| Martin Whitman | 2017-04-30 | Add 24.28% | 0.45% | $75.98 - $88.43 | $ 86.01 | 8% | 305,065 | |
| Third Avenue Management | 2017-03-31 | Add 33.52% | 0.34% | $75.98 - $91.15 | $ 86.01 | 4% | 360,653 | |
| Joel Greenblatt | 2017-03-31 | Add 106.66% | 0.14% | $75.98 - $91.15 | $ 86.01 | 4% | 272,293 | |
| Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss | 2017-03-31 | Reduce -80.97% | 0.13% | $75.98 - $91.15 | $ 86.01 | 4% | 225,936 | |
| Mason Hawkins | 2017-03-31 | Reduce -99.57% | 2.72% | $75.98 - $91.15 | $ 86.01 | 4% | 13,600 | |
| Ron Baron | 2017-03-31 | Sold Out | 0.02% | $75.98 - $91.15 | $ 86.01 | 4% | 0 | |
| Mason Hawkins | 2017-02-28 | Reduce -99.31% | 2.38% |  $79.33 | $ 86.01 | 8% | 21,600 | |
| Mason Hawkins | 2016-12-31 | Add 11.81% | 0.29% | $89.45 - $113.68 | $ 86.01 | -15% | 3,133,039 | |
| Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss | 2016-12-31 | Add 1.13% | $89.45 - $113.68 | $ 86.01 | -15% | 1,187,559 | | |
| Third Avenue Management | 2016-12-31 | Reduce -0.66% | 0.01% | $89.45 - $113.68 | $ 86.01 | -15% | 270,116 | |
| Joel Greenblatt | 2016-12-31 | Add 9.33% | 0.01% | $89.45 - $113.68 | $ 86.01 | -15% | 131,761 | |
| Keeley Asset Management Corp | 2016-12-31 | Add 10.92% | $89.45 - $113.68 | $ 86.01 | -15% | 11,176 | |
More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!! More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!! What is Peter Lynch Charts )| Industry: | Manufacturing - Apparel & Furniture » Apparel Manufacturing NAICS: 315220 SIC: 2329 | |
|---|---|---|
| Compare: | MIL:MONC, NYSE:KORS, TSX:GIL, SHSE:600398, NYSE:UAA, SZSE:002044, XTER:BOSS, NYSE:HBI, SHSE:600177, NYSE:CRI, NYSE:PVH, SZSE:002640, WAR:LPP, NAS:COLM, SHSE:600884, SZSE:002563, BOM:532827, SZSE:002503, NYSE:UNF, BSP:GUAR3 » details | |
| Traded in other countries: | PRL.Germany, | |
| Headquarter Location: | USA |
Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL), (-15%; -0.62%), the upscale retail brand, declined following the departure of CEO Stefan Larsson after less than two years at the helm. Our case was built on the potential for Larsson and Lauren to form a complimentary business and creative team, and the early results were promising as they cut costs and rationalized unnecessary stock keeping units. But when these two leaders were not able to coexist, a big part of our case changed. Rather than wait to see if the operating plan could continue without Larsson’s guidance, we sold our position. The disappointing outcome had only a minor impact on our return during our seven month investment period because of the operating progress the company made in a short period and because we have begun sizing new investments at less than a full 5% position while we gain more in-depth knowledge of the business and people as an owner.
From Longleaf Partners Fund first quarter 2017 commentary.
Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL) is one of the crown jewels in retail. It is well capitalized with a net cash balance sheet and has historically earned a premium valuation. Given its compounding history, the premium valuation is justified. Due to short-term factors, the stock price has dropped over 40% from recent highs and now trades at absolute valuation levels last seen shortly after the financial crisis. It is a rare opportunity to buy a well-managed, well capitalized, owner-operator at an attractive price.
Although retail has historically been an area that Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) (TAM) shies away from, RL is an exception. It meets our three pillar criteria as it is a credit worthy compounder trading at a discount to NAV. Over the past five and ten year periods, RL has grown book value (including dividends) 11% and 13%, respectively. It is a blue-chip asset with a more stable operating history than most players in the space. For example, sales only declined marginally in 2009, following the financial crisis. Although it could be categorized as a retail company, considering that roughly half of RL’s sales are wholesale/licensing and its brand strength, it’s more comparable to Nike than a typical retailer.
Besides macro concerns about an economic slowdown, company specific issues have soured RL’s near-term outlook. We have assessed these risks and feel it is a classic case of investor short-termism. First, the strong USD has impacted sales. One-third of RL’s sales are from outside the US, so currency translation has pinched sales and margins. Also, 20% of RL’s sales come from foreign tourists shopping in the US. Those sales have been pinched as tourists are choosing to stay home as the costs of traveling to the US have risen with the stronger USD. RL continues to experience double digit same-store sales growth in flagship stores overseas, so it does not appear to be a brand problem.
Another major factor impacting RL is the implementation of its Global Reorganization Plan (GRP). Management is investing for growth by creating a brand based operating structure, implementing a global SAP system (US completed and Europe in-process) and expanding its global footprint and internet presence. All initiatives make sense in the long-run, but have been costly in the short-run. The slower than expected sales and additional costs have pressured margins, creating investor angst. Management projects cost savings of $100 million per year once the initiatives are completed later this year. Investors are struggling to see through the near-term noise which has created a worst-case scenario valuation.
A final catalyst is the hiring of CEO Stephan Larsson. Larsson is a young, ambitious retail executive who had highly successful stints at H&M and Old Navy. With Ralph Lauren now 75 years old, Larsson’s hiring makes strategic sense. Lauren will remain a creative force at the company, but Larsson’s expertise in understanding the fast fashion landscape (H&M) and turnarounds (Old Navy) might be the shot in the arm RL needs.
In summary, we feel that the favorable long-term prospects heavily outweigh the near-term concerns embedded in RL’s current valuation. Higher sales, a weaker USD and lower GRP costs can all contribute to a brighter outlook for RL’s operations. With the additional benefit of a highly motivated new CEO, the pace of change has probably been accelerated.
From the Third Avenue Value Fund 1st quarter 2016 letter.
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward PE Ratio | 16.58 |
RL's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
51% of the 65 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 17.01 vs. RL: 16.58 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only. |
N/A |
| Price-to-Owner-Earnings | 25.97 |
RL's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
63% of the 382 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 19.72 vs. RL: 25.97 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.15 Med: 20.7 Max: 61.64 Current: 25.97 |
| PB Ratio | 2.08 |
RL's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 752 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. RL: 2.08 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only. |
RL'
s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.18 Med: 3 Max: 5.37 Current: 2.08 |
| PS Ratio | 1.13 |
RL's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 745 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. RL: 1.13 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only. |
RL'
s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66 Med: 1.71 Max: 2.52 Current: 1.13 |
| Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow | 8.97 |
RL's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
80% of the 296 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 16.92 vs. RL: 8.97 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.6 Med: 18.39 Max: 32.33 Current: 8.97 |
| Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow | 6.82 |
RL's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
78% of the 363 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 11.98 vs. RL: 6.82 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.26 Med: 11.92 Max: 21.12 Current: 6.82 |
| EV-to-EBIT | 205.83 |
RL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
98% of the 605 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 14.79 vs. RL: 205.83 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only. |
RL'
s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -67.7 Med: 12.6 Max: 223.2 Current: 205.83 |
| EV-to-EBITDA | 18.19 |
RL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
69% of the 637 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 12.00 vs. RL: 18.19 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only. |
RL'
s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.3 Med: 10.1 Max: 29 Current: 18.19 |
| EV-to-Revenue | 0.96 |
RL's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
55% of the 751 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. RL: 0.96 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only. |
RL'
s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6 Med: 1.6 Max: 2.5 Current: 0.96 |
| Shiller PE Ratio | 14.92 |
RL's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 181 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 24.13 vs. RL: 14.92 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only. |
RL'
s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.52 Med: 28.52 Max: 49.66 Current: 14.92 |
| Current Ratio | 2.54 |
RL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 693 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. RL: 2.54 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only. |
RL'
s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.62 Med: 2.54 Max: 3.81 Current: 2.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.83 |
RL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 693 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. RL: 1.83 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only. |
RL'
s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79 Med: 1.65 Max: 2.39 Current: 1.83 |
| Days Inventory | 129.79 |
RL's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
60% of the 725 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 105.84 vs. RL: 129.79 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only. |
RL'
s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 82.95 Med: 104.9 Max: 129.79 Current: 129.79 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 15.80 |
RL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
88% of the 642 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 48.87 vs. RL: 15.80 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only. |
RL'
s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.8 Med: 28.68 Max: 38.03 Current: 15.8 |
| Days Payable | 20.67 |
RL's Days Payable is ranked lower than
86% of the 577 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 53.34 vs. RL: 20.67 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only. |
RL'
s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.12 Med: 23.62 Max: 33.49 Current: 20.67 |
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield % | 2.32 |
RL's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
54% of the 674 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 2.11 vs. RL: 2.32 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only. |
RL'
s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2 Med: 0.58 Max: 3.03 Current: 2.32 |
| 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate | 5.60 |
RL's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
54% of the 333 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. RL: 5.60 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only. |
RL'
s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0 Med: 0 Max: 74.7 Current: 5.6 |
| Forward Dividend Yield % | 2.32 |
RL's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
51% of the 643 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 2.26 vs. RL: 2.32 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only. |
N/A |
| 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % | 4.98 |
RL's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
77% of the 866 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. RL: 4.98 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only. |
RL'
s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43 Med: 1.24 Max: 6.5 Current: 4.98 |
| 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio | 2.50 |
RL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 418 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: -2.60 vs. RL: 2.50 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only. |
RL'
s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.2 Med: 1.15 Max: 2.7 Current: 2.5 |
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value | 11.04 |
RL's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
78% of the 500 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 4.44 vs. RL: 11.04 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.38 Med: 11.23 Max: 373.8 Current: 11.04 |
| Price-to-Tangible-Book | 3.14 |
RL's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
65% of the 712 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.96 vs. RL: 3.14 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.49 Med: 4.35 Max: 10.88 Current: 3.14 |
| Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF | 0.82 | ||
| Price-to-Median-PS-Value | 0.65 |
RL's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
90% of the 651 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. RL: 0.65 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only. |
RL'
s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41 Med: 0.79 Max: 1.42 Current: 0.65 |
| Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % | 0.49 |
RL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
77% of the 771 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 5.15 vs. RL: 0.49 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only. |
RL'
s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.9 Med: 7.8 Max: 23.9 Current: 0.49 |
| Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % | -11.99 |
RL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
79% of the 437 Companies in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry. ( Industry Median: 6.77 vs. RL: -11.99 ) Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only. |
RL'
s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.4 Med: 17.3 Max: 35.4 Current: -11.99 |
| Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $ | 6,447.90 |
|---|---|
| EPS (TTM) $ | -0.21 |
| Beta | 0.15 |
| Short Percentage of Float | 10.73% |
| 52-Week Range $ | 66.06 - 114.00 |
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 81.26 |
| Mar18 | Mar19 | Mar20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (Mil $) | 6,071 | 6,039 | 6,140 |
| EPS ($) | 5.20 | 5.40 | 5.95 |
| EPS without NRI ($) | 5.20 | 5.40 | 5.95 |
| EPS Growth Rate (Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate) | 4.50% | ||
| Dividends per Share ($) | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
|
| Will V.F. Corp (VFC) Strategies Facilitate Q3 Earnings Beat? Oct 16 2017 - ZACKS |
GF Chat
Excel Add-In GURUF
API
My Portfolios
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
My Gurus
Personalize
My Gurus
Email Alerts
Stock PDF
RSS
Website
Filings
Manual of Stocks™ Web APP