Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.57
RL's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
52% of the 728 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. RL: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
RL' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.27 Max: No Debt
Current: 1.57
Equity-to-Asset 0.58
RL's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
55% of the 717 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. RL: 0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
RL' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.71
Current: 0.58
0.45
0.71
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 4.29
Beneish M-Score: -3.51
WACC vs ROIC
3.77%
-2.79%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -1.42
RL's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
60% of the 727 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.31 vs. RL: -1.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
RL' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.42  Med: 13.9 Max: 16.22
Current: -1.42
-1.42
16.22
Net Margin % -1.49
RL's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
62% of the 728 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.73 vs. RL: -1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
RL' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.49  Med: 9.42 Max: 10.8
Current: -1.49
-1.49
10.8
ROE % -2.79
RL's ROE % is ranked lower than
62% of the 719 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 7.40 vs. RL: -2.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
RL' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.82  Med: 17.7 Max: 20.17
Current: -2.79
-2.82
20.17
ROA % -1.65
RL's ROA % is ranked lower than
59% of the 732 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 3.78 vs. RL: -1.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
RL' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.67  Med: 11.09 Max: 13.84
Current: -1.65
-1.67
13.84
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -4.17
RL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 730 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 13.97 vs. RL: -4.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
RL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.33  Med: 54.85 Max: 68.43
Current: -4.17
-4.33
68.43
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.20
RL's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
62% of the 617 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. RL: -0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
RL' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.2  Med: 11.9 Max: 18.8
Current: -0.2
-0.2
18.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -44.20
RL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
79% of the 506 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. RL: -44.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
RL' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.2  Med: 11 Max: 28.1
Current: -44.2
-44.2
28.1
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Ralph Lauren Corp $RL.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» RL's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-18 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

RL Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,186,531 sh (New)
Mason Hawkins 2,736,418 sh (New)
Jim Simons 728,300 sh (+3210.45%)
Third Avenue Management 274,832 sh (+20.09%)
Chuck Royce 61,100 sh (+17.03%)
Martin Whitman 200,865 sh (+75.48%)
Robert Olstein Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Scott Black 22,642 sh (-2.58%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 10,136 sh (-4.10%)
Murray Stahl 4,444 sh (-13.29%)
Ron Baron 32,300 sh (-20.64%)
Joel Greenblatt 115,330 sh (-25.77%)
» More
Q3 2016

RL Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 15,209 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 120,519 sh (+4.50%)
Mason Hawkins 2,802,177 sh (+2.40%)
Martin Whitman 245,465 sh (+22.20%)
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Keeley Asset Management Corp 10,076 sh (-0.59%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,174,290 sh (-1.03%)
Third Avenue Management 271,913 sh (-1.06%)
Murray Stahl 4,134 sh (-6.98%)
Ron Baron 30,000 sh (-7.12%)
Scott Black 16,043 sh (-29.14%)
Jim Simons 468,900 sh (-35.62%)
» More
Q4 2016

RL Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Ray Dalio 21,400 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 4,631 sh (+12.02%)
Mason Hawkins 3,133,039 sh (+11.81%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 11,176 sh (+10.92%)
Joel Greenblatt 131,761 sh (+9.33%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 1,187,559 sh (+1.13%)
Ron Baron 30,000 sh (unchged)
Martin Whitman 245,465 sh (unchged)
Scott Black Sold Out
Third Avenue Management 270,116 sh (-0.66%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,912 sh (-41.40%)
Jim Simons 65,300 sh (-86.07%)
» More
Q1 2017

RL Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Chuck Royce 35,500 sh (New)
Francisco García Paramés 58,203 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 28,356 sh (+218.18%)
Joel Greenblatt 272,293 sh (+106.66%)
Third Avenue Management 360,653 sh (+33.52%)
Murray Stahl 5,203 sh (+12.35%)
Martin Whitman 245,465 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron Sold Out
Ray Dalio 8,336 sh (-61.05%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 225,936 sh (-80.97%)
Jim Simons 8,100 sh (-87.60%)
Mason Hawkins 13,600 sh (-99.57%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Manufacturing - Apparel & Furniture » Apparel Manufacturing    NAICS: 315220    SIC: 2329
Compare:OTCPK:BOSSY, NYSE:KORS, OTCPK:MONRF, NYSE:GIL, NYSE:CRI, NAS:COLM, NYSE:HBI, OTCPK:BHOOY, NYSE:UNF, NYSE:PVH, NYSE:UAA, NYSE:KATE, NYSE:GOOS, OTCPK:WACLY, OTCPK:BLUNY, NAS:GIII, OTCPK:CDGXF, NYSE:OXM, OTCPK:BSDGY, NAS:ICON » details
Traded in other countries:PRL.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Ralph Lauren Corp designs, markets, and distributes men's, women's and children's apparel, accessories, fragrances, and home furnishings. Its segments include Wholesale, Retail, and Licensing.

Ralph Lauren markets, designs, sources, and distributes a wide range of apparel and accessories through department stores, specialty retailers, and its own chain of retail stores and outlets. The core brand names include Polo, Ralph Lauren, and Lauren. Other subbrands include Women's Polo, Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Blue Label, RLX, Polo Sport, and Chaps. The company also operates its own portfolio of retail stores under the Ralph Lauren and Club Monaco names.

Guru Investment Theses on Ralph Lauren Corp

Longleaf Partners Comments on Ralph Lauren - Apr 14, 2017

Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL), (-15%; -0.62%), the upscale retail brand, declined following the departure of CEO Stefan Larsson after less than two years at the helm. Our case was built on the potential for Larsson and Lauren to form a complimentary business and creative team, and the early results were promising as they cut costs and rationalized unnecessary stock keeping units. But when these two leaders were not able to coexist, a big part of our case changed. Rather than wait to see if the operating plan could continue without Larsson’s guidance, we sold our position. The disappointing outcome had only a minor impact on our return during our seven month investment period because of the operating progress the company made in a short period and because we have begun sizing new investments at less than a full 5% position while we gain more in-depth knowledge of the business and people as an owner.



From Longleaf Partners Fund first quarter 2017 commentary.



Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Third Avenue Management Comments on Ralph Lauren - Mar 29, 2016

Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL) is one of the crown jewels in retail. It is well capitalized with a net cash balance sheet and has historically earned a premium valuation. Given its compounding history, the premium valuation is justified. Due to short-term factors, the stock price has dropped over 40% from recent highs and now trades at absolute valuation levels last seen shortly after the financial crisis. It is a rare opportunity to buy a well-managed, well capitalized, owner-operator at an attractive price.

Although retail has historically been an area that Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) (TAM) shies away from, RL is an exception. It meets our three pillar criteria as it is a credit worthy compounder trading at a discount to NAV. Over the past five and ten year periods, RL has grown book value (including dividends) 11% and 13%, respectively. It is a blue-chip asset with a more stable operating history than most players in the space. For example, sales only declined marginally in 2009, following the financial crisis. Although it could be categorized as a retail company, considering that roughly half of RL’s sales are wholesale/licensing and its brand strength, it’s more comparable to Nike than a typical retailer.

Besides macro concerns about an economic slowdown, company specific issues have soured RL’s near-term outlook. We have assessed these risks and feel it is a classic case of investor short-termism. First, the strong USD has impacted sales. One-third of RL’s sales are from outside the US, so currency translation has pinched sales and margins. Also, 20% of RL’s sales come from foreign tourists shopping in the US. Those sales have been pinched as tourists are choosing to stay home as the costs of traveling to the US have risen with the stronger USD. RL continues to experience double digit same-store sales growth in flagship stores overseas, so it does not appear to be a brand problem.

Another major factor impacting RL is the implementation of its Global Reorganization Plan (GRP). Management is investing for growth by creating a brand based operating structure, implementing a global SAP system (US completed and Europe in-process) and expanding its global footprint and internet presence. All initiatives make sense in the long-run, but have been costly in the short-run. The slower than expected sales and additional costs have pressured margins, creating investor angst. Management projects cost savings of $100 million per year once the initiatives are completed later this year. Investors are struggling to see through the near-term noise which has created a worst-case scenario valuation.

A final catalyst is the hiring of CEO Stephan Larsson. Larsson is a young, ambitious retail executive who had highly successful stints at H&M and Old Navy. With Ralph Lauren now 75 years old, Larsson’s hiring makes strategic sense. Lauren will remain a creative force at the company, but Larsson’s expertise in understanding the fast fashion landscape (H&M) and turnarounds (Old Navy) might be the shot in the arm RL needs.

In summary, we feel that the favorable long-term prospects heavily outweigh the near-term concerns embedded in RL’s current valuation. Higher sales, a weaker USD and lower GRP costs can all contribute to a brighter outlook for RL’s operations. With the additional benefit of a highly motivated new CEO, the pace of change has probably been accelerated.



From the Third Avenue Value Fund 1st quarter 2016 letter.



Check out Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Ralph Lauren Corp

Longleaf Partners Comments on Ralph Lauren Guru stock highlight
Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL), (-15%; -0.62%), the upscale retail brand, declined following the departure of CEO Stefan Larsson after less than two years at the helm. Our case was built on the potential for Larsson and Lauren to form a complimentary business and creative team, and the early results were promising as they cut costs and rationalized unnecessary stock keeping units. But when these two leaders were not able to coexist, a big part of our case changed. Rather than wait to see if the operating plan could continue without Larsson’s guidance, we sold our position. The disappointing outcome had only a minor impact on our return during our seven month investment period because of the operating progress the company made in a short period and because we have begun sizing new investments at less than a full 5% position while we gain more in-depth knowledge of the business and people as an owner. Read more...
Perrigo, Ralph Lauren Reach 3-Year Low Prices Stocks that have hit their historical low prices
Perrigo Co. PLC (NYSE:PRGO) reached $77.80 Read more...
Whitman Adds to 3 Positions in 3rd Quarter Guru boosts holdings in Johnson Controls, Ralph Lauren, Harman International Industries
Martin Whitman (Trades, Portfolio), founder and portfolio manager of the Third Avenue Value Fund and adjunct faculty member at Yale’s School of Management, added to three positions in the portfolio in the third quarter. It was the fewest quarterly additions the guru has made since the third quarter of 2013. Read more...
Third Avenue Management Buys 6 Stocks in Second Quarter Martin Whitman's value firm reports second quarter portfolio
Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio) has based its investing on value-driven, bottom-up principles since a recognized leader in the field, Martin Whitman (Trades, Portfolio), founded it in 1986. The firm frequently files its quarterly portfolio update ahead of the deadline of 45 days past the end of the quarter and before many other investors. Third Avenue reported buying one new stock and buying more shares of five of its existing holdings on Thursday, the final day of the second quarter. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 12.87
RL's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
59% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 16.31 vs. RL: 12.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 49.52
RL's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
55% of the 347 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 17.01 vs. RL: 49.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
RL' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.15  Med: 20.36 Max: 61.51
Current: 49.52
6.15
61.51
PB Ratio 1.65
RL's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 714 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.74 vs. RL: 1.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
RL' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.18  Med: 3.03 Max: 5.37
Current: 1.65
1.18
5.37
PS Ratio 0.82
RL's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. RL: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
RL' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.75 Max: 2.52
Current: 0.82
0.66
2.52
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 8.23
RL's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
70% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 15.51 vs. RL: 8.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
RL' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.6  Med: 18.94 Max: 32.38
Current: 8.23
5.6
32.38
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.77
RL's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
75% of the 375 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.50 vs. RL: 5.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
RL' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.26  Med: 12.47 Max: 21.12
Current: 5.77
4.26
21.12
EV-to-EBIT -52.58
RL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
74% of the 723 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 14.44 vs. RL: -52.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -67.6  Med: 12.5 Max: 35.1
Current: -52.58
-67.6
35.1
EV-to-EBITDA 22.62
RL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
54% of the 758 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 11.39 vs. RL: 22.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.3  Med: 9.9 Max: 29.1
Current: 22.62
3.3
29.1
Shiller PE Ratio 11.49
RL's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 25.91 vs. RL: 11.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
RL' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.57  Med: 28.81 Max: 49.66
Current: 11.49
11.57
49.66
Current Ratio 2.55
RL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. RL: 2.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.63  Med: 2.55 Max: 3.43
Current: 2.55
1.63
3.43
Quick Ratio 1.86
RL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 647 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. RL: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 1.68 Max: 2.38
Current: 1.86
0.87
2.38
Days Inventory 129.26
RL's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
62% of the 687 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 105.78 vs. RL: 129.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 82.95  Med: 104.92 Max: 122.85
Current: 129.26
82.95
122.85
Days Sales Outstanding 24.70
RL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
88% of the 582 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 48.66 vs. RL: 24.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.08  Med: 28.68 Max: 38.03
Current: 24.7
24.08
38.03
Days Payable 17.96
RL's Days Payable is ranked lower than
89% of the 531 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 54.04 vs. RL: 17.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.12  Med: 23.62 Max: 33.49
Current: 17.96
17.12
33.49

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 3.03
RL's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
55% of the 653 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.27 vs. RL: 3.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
RL' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 3.01
Current: 3.03
0.2
3.01
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 5.60
RL's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
56% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. RL: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
RL' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 74.7
Current: 5.6
0
74.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 3.03
RL's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
54% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. RL: 3.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.52
RL's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
91% of the 820 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 2.51 vs. RL: 6.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
RL' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.07 Max: 6.52
Current: 6.52
0.43
6.52
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.50
RL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 354 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. RL: 2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.2  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.7
Current: 2.5
-2.2
2.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 9.03
RL's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
73% of the 463 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.07 vs. RL: 9.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
RL' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.74  Med: 11.21 Max: 373.8
Current: 9.03
6.74
373.8
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.50
RL's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
59% of the 680 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. RL: 2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
RL' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.56  Med: 4.46 Max: 7.35
Current: 2.5
2.56
7.35
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.65
RL's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. RL: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
RL' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.25 Max: 1.92
Current: 0.65
0.54
1.92
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.47
RL's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
94% of the 582 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. RL: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
RL' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.74 Max: 1.39
Current: 0.47
0.49
1.39
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -1.90
RL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 5.38 vs. RL: -1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
RL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 8 Max: 23.9
Current: -1.9
2.8
23.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -6.69
RL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
63% of the 394 Companies
in the Global Apparel Manufacturing industry.

( Industry Median: 6.05 vs. RL: -6.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
RL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.6  Med: 17.3 Max: 35.4
Current: -6.69
-8.6
35.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $6,653
EPS (TTM) $ -1.20
Beta0.33
Short Percentage of Float9.69%
52-Week Range $66.06 - 114.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)81.00

Analyst Estimate

Mar18 Mar19
Revenue (Mil $) 6,176 5,874
EPS ($) 5.31 5.85
EPS without NRI ($) 5.31 5.85
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
3.11%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.03 2.21
» More Articles for RL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Dillard's Less Affected by Internet Than Competing Retail May 17 2017 
Stocks That Fell to 3-Year Lows in the Week of April 14 Apr 16 2017 
Longleaf Partners Comments on Ralph Lauren Apr 14 2017 
Longleaf Partners 1st Quarter Commentary Apr 19 2017 
Scott Black Sells Time Warner, Union Pacific, Tegna Mar 20 2017 
Southeastern Asset Management Gains 2 New Holdings, Adds to Several Others Mar 13 2017 
A Worldwide Fashionable Brand for Income Investors Feb 26 2017 
Ralph Lauren Still a Value Trap Feb 02 2017 
Perrigo, Ralph Lauren Reach 3-Year Low Prices Jan 14 2017 
An Undervalued, Recession-Resistant, Shareholder-Friendly REIT Jan 13 2017 

More From Other Websites
ETFs with exposure to Ralph Lauren Corp. : May 25, 2017 May 25 2017
Watch BizWireTV as LinkedIn Shows the World Where They Want to Work with a Ranking of Companies and... May 25 2017
Edited Transcript of RL earnings conference call or presentation 18-May-17 1:00pm GMT May 24 2017
A Look at Gap’s Year-to-Date Stock Market Returns May 24 2017
Ralph Lauren Corp. :RL-US: Earnings Analysis: 2017 By the Numbers : May 23, 2017 May 23 2017
Wall Street Analysts’ View on PVH Corp Is Positive May 23 2017
Top Losers in the Consumer Sector: Week of May 15–19, 2017 May 22 2017
Consumer Sector Post-Earnings Coverage for May 15–19, 2017 May 22 2017
​P&G president named CEO of Ralph Lauren May 22 2017
Here's how much of a pay bump P&G president will get as CEO of Ralph Lauren May 22 2017
An Inside Take On The Challenges Patrice Louvet Faces At Ralph Lauren May 22 2017
Ralph Lauren: Rough Times Ahead? May 19 2017
Ralph Lauren posts quarterly loss a day after naming new CEO May 18 2017
PreMarket Prep Recap For May 18: Brazil Stocks Tank, Retail Earnings Continue May 18 2017
Ralph Lauren's comparable sales fall for ninth straight quarter May 18 2017
Ralph Lauren (RL) Jumps on Q4 Earnings Beat, Gives '18 View May 18 2017
Prepare to Pay More for Polo as Ralph Lauren Reduces Off-Price Sales Amid Turnaround Attempt May 18 2017
Ralph Lauren (RL) Beats on Q4 Earnings, Stock Jumps 2.5% May 18 2017
Ralph Lauren shares rise after earnings beat expectations May 18 2017
Ralph Lauren Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2017 Results May 18 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)