Minerals 260MTSZF 33 Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus rates MTSZF with a GF Score™ of 33/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 591 Metals & Mining companies, Minerals 260 ranks worse than 169204.57% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
MTSZF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.08 Med: -0.04 Max: -0.01
Current: -0.01
During the past 5 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Minerals 260 was -0.01. The lowest was -0.08. And the median was -0.04.
MTSZF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 100% of 591
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.23
vs MTSZF: -0.01
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Minerals 260 Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Minerals 260 Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Precious Metals & Mining subindustry, Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Minerals 260 Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.
Minerals 260 (MTSZF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.01 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Minerals 260. According to the industry distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Minerals 260's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. Based on the distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #999999 out of 591 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Minerals 260 has a GF Score™ of 33/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Minerals 260's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to HL?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #999999 out of 591 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Minerals 260 in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.23, based on 591 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Minerals 260. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.23 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Minerals 260's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Minerals 260 stock overvalued right now?
Minerals 260 (MTSZF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.01. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01. Minerals 260's overall GF Score™ is 33/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Minerals 260 (MTSZF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.01 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Minerals 260 Ltd is a mineral exploration company. The company's projects include Moora Project, Aston Lithium- Lithium, Uranium & Rare Earth Element Project Koojan JV Project, Dingo Rocks, and Yalwest.
33GF Score
Get the complete analysis for MTSZF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
MTSZF has been successfully added to your 
