Minerals 260MTSZF 33 Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -21.39% as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus rates MTSZF with a GF Score™ of 33/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,662 Metals & Mining companies, Minerals 260 ranks worse than 54.43% on this metric.
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated as Net Income divided by its average total tangible assets. Total tangible assets equals to Total Assets minus Intangible Assets. Minerals 260's annualizedNet Income for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $-31.88 Mil. Minerals 260's average total tangible assets for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $149.07 Mil. Therefore, Minerals 260's annualized Return-on-Tangible-Asset for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was -21.39%.
The historical rank and industry rank for Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset or its related term are showing as below:
MTSZF'
s Return-on-Tangible-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -343.97 Med: -57.84 Max: -9.19
Current: -21.52
During the past 5 years, Minerals 260's highest Return-on-Tangible-Asset was -9.19%. The lowest was -343.97%. And the median was -57.84%.
MTSZF's Return-on-Tangible-Asset is ranked worse than 54.43% of 2662
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: -17.275
vs MTSZF: -21.52
Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures the rate of return on the average total tangible assets (total assets minus intangible assets). Tangible means physical in nature. Intangible Assets are assets that are not physical in nature, and typically "derive their value from legal or intellectual rights." Return-on-Tangible-Asset measures a firm's efficiency at generating profits from its tangible assets. It shows how well a company uses what it has to generate earnings. Return-on-Tangible-Assets can vary drastically across industries. Therefore, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be used to compare companies in different industries.
Be Aware
Like ROE and ROA, Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated with only 12 months data. Fluctuations in the companys earnings or business cycles can affect the ratio drastically. It is important to look at the ratio from a long term perspective. Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be affected by events such as stock buyback or issuance, and by a companys tax rate and its interest payment. Return-on-Tangible-Asset may not reflect the true earning power of the assets. A more accurate measurement is ROC % (ROC).
Many analysts argue the higher return the better. Buffett states that really high Return-on-Tangible-Asset may indicate vulnerability in the durability of the competitive advantage.
Minerals 260 Return-on-Tangible-Asset Related Terms
Minerals 260 Return-on-Tangible-Asset Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Other Precious Metals & Mining subindustry, Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset, along with its competitors' market caps and Return-on-Tangible-Asset data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Minerals 260 Return-on-Tangible-Asset vs Metals & Mining Industry
For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Return-on-Tangible-Asset, the net income of the last fiscal year and the average total tangible assets over the fiscal year are used. In calculating the quarterly data,
the Net Income data used here is two times the semi-annual (Dec. 2025) net income data.
What does a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -21.39% mean?
Minerals 260 (MTSZF) has a Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -21.39% as of Dec. 2025. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Minerals 260 and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #1449 out of 2662 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, placing it in the top 54.4%.
Is Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset too high?
Minerals 260's current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -21.39%. Based on the distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #1449 out of 2662 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Minerals 260 has a GF Score™ of 33/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Minerals 260's Return-on-Tangible-Asset compare to HL?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, Minerals 260 ranks #1449 out of 2662 companies for Return-on-Tangible-Asset. This places Minerals 260 in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Return-on-Tangible-Asset for a Metals & Mining company?
A good Return-on-Tangible-Asset depends on the Metals & Mining industry context. However, Return-on-Tangible-Asset should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Return-on-Tangible-Asset mean?
A high Return-on-Tangible-Asset can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Return on tangible assets is the ratio of current-period net income to average two-period tangible assets. View historical data on Minerals 260 and its competitors. Minerals 260's current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -21.39%. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Minerals 260 stock overvalued right now?
Minerals 260 (MTSZF) has a current Return-on-Tangible-Asset of -21.39%. The current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -21.39%. Minerals 260's overall GF Score™ is 33/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Return-on-Tangible-Asset calculated?
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Minerals 260 (MTSZF), the current Return-on-Tangible-Asset is -21.39% as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Minerals 260 Ltd is a mineral exploration company. The company's projects include Moora Project, Aston Lithium- Lithium, Uranium & Rare Earth Element Project Koojan JV Project, Dingo Rocks, and Yalwest.
33GF Score
Get the complete analysis for MTSZF
Return-on-Tangible-Asset is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
MTSZF has been successfully added to your 
