Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
RentTSE:372A -0.18%12 Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.04 as of May. 2026, which is 58% below its 10-year median of 2.48. GuruFocus rates TSE:372A with a GF Score™ of 12/100. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 835 Business Services companies, Rent ranks worse than 66.83% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
TSE:372A'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3 Med: 2.48 Max: 2.74
Current: 2.74
During the past 4 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Rent was 2.74. The lowest was 2.30. And the median was 2.48.
TSE:372A's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 66.83% of 835
companies
in the Business Services industry
Industry Median: 1.67
vs TSE:372A: 2.74
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Rent Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Rent Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
TSE:372A vs URI, SUNB, AER: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Rental & Leasing Services subindustry, Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Rent Debt-to-EBITDA vs Business Services Industry
For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (May. 2026) EBITDA data.
Rent (TSE:372A) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.04 as of May. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Rent. This is 58% below median its historical median of 2.48. Over the past decade, Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 2.30 to 2.74. According to the industry distribution chart, Rent ranks #558 out of 835 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 66.8%.
Is Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Rent's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.04 is 58% below median its 10-year median of 2.48. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.30 to a high of 2.74. The Business Services industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.67. Rent's value of 1.04 is 37.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Rent ranks #558 out of 835 companies in the Business Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Rent has a GF Score™ of 12/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Rent's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to URI and SUNB?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Rent ranks #558 out of 835 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Rent in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.67. Rent's value of 1.04 is 37.7% below this benchmark. Historically, Rent's own Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 2.30 to 2.74 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 2.48 vs. the industry median of 1.67, Rent has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Business Services company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Business Services companies is 1.67, based on 835 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Rent's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.04 is 37.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Rent. For the Business Services industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.67 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Rent's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.04, which is 58% below median its own 10-year median of 2.48. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Rent stock overvalued right now?
Rent (TSE:372A) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.04. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.04, which is 58% below median its 10-year median of 2.48 and 37.7% below the Business Services industry median of 1.67. Rent's overall GF Score™ is 12/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Rent (TSE:372A), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.04 as of May. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Rent Corp engages in the rental business of industrial vehicles, general passenger cars, industrial machinery and equipment, construction machinery and tools. It also provides calibration for measuring tools, battery regeneration, construction machine training and sale of equipment and used machines.
12GF Score
Get the complete analysis for TSE:372A
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
TSE:372A has been successfully added to your 
