Rent (TSE:372A) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 19, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

TSE:372A Rent Corp TSE:372A
12 GF Score
Price 円5,490.00
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Rent Piotroski F-Score?

Rent TSE:372A +2.62% 12 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 19, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates TSE:372A with a GF Score™ of 12/100. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,066 Business Services companies, Rent ranks better than 51.22% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rent has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Rent's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:372A' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5   Med: 5   Max: 5
Current: 5

During the past 4 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Rent was 5. The lowest was 5. And the median was 5.

Rent  (TSE:372A) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Rent Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Rent Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Rent's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Rent Piotroski F-Score Chart

Rent Annual Data
Trend May23 May24 May25 May26
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 5.00 5.00

Rent Quarterly Data
May23 May24 Feb25 May25 Aug25 Nov25 Feb26 May26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00

TSE:372A vs URI, SUNB, AER: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Rental & Leasing Services subindustry, Rent's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Rent Piotroski F-Score vs Business Services Industry

For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Rent's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Rent's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSE:372A
12GF Score
Rent Corp TSE:372A
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (May26) TTM:Last Year (May25) TTM:
Net Income was 円2,901 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円411 Mil.
Revenue was 円52,945 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円17,786 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (May25)
to the end of this year (May26) was (57910.376 + 68201.67) / 2 = 円63056.023 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (May25) was 円57,910 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円25,466 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円18,664 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円19,995 Mil.
Net Income was 円2,499 Mil.

Revenue was 円49,088 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円15,678 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (May24)
to the end of last year (May25) was (51296.592 + 57910.376) / 2 = 円54603.484 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (May24) was 円51,297 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円19,441 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円16,076 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円20,966 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rent's current Net Income (TTM) was 2,901. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rent's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 411. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (May25)
=2901.069/57910.376
=0.05009584

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (May24)
=2498.909/51296.592
=0.04871491

Rent's return on assets of this year was 0.05009584. Rent's return on assets of last year was 0.04871491. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Rent's current Net Income (TTM) was 2,901. Rent's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 411. ==> 411 <= 2,901 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: May26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from May25 to May26
=25465.897/63056.023
=0.40386145

Gearing (Last Year: May25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from May24 to May25
=19441.083/54603.484
=0.35604107

Rent's gearing of this year was 0.40386145. Rent's gearing of last year was 0.35604107. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: May26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=18663.789/19995.059
=0.93342005

Current Ratio (Last Year: May25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=16076.493/20965.744
=0.76679812

Rent's current ratio of this year was 0.93342005. Rent's current ratio of last year was 0.76679812. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Rent's number of shares in issue this year was 3.827. Rent's number of shares in issue last year was 3.702. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=17786.01/52945.301
=0.33593179

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=15678.359/49088.449
=0.31938999

Rent's gross margin of this year was 0.33593179. Rent's gross margin of last year was 0.31938999. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (May25)
=52945.301/57910.376
=0.91426277

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (May24)
=49088.449/51296.592
=0.95695342

Rent's asset turnover of this year was 0.91426277. Rent's asset turnover of last year was 0.95695342. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+0+1+0+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rent has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Rent (TSE:372A) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 19, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Rent and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Rent's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Rent ranks #520 out of 1066 companies in the Business Services industry, placing it in the top 48.8%.
Is Rent's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Rent's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 5.00 to a high of 5.00. The Business Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Rent's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Rent ranks #520 out of 1066 companies in the Business Services industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Rent has a GF Score™ of 12/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Rent's Piotroski F-Score compare to URI and SUNB?
According to the Business Services industry distribution chart, Rent ranks #520 out of 1066 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Rent in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Rent's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Rent's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Rent has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Business Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Business Services companies is 5.00, based on 1,066 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Rent's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Rent and its competitors. For the Business Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Rent's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Rent stock overvalued right now?
Rent (TSE:372A) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 5. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Business Services industry median of 5.00. Rent's overall GF Score™ is 12/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Rent (TSE:372A), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 19, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Rent Business Description

Address 1-6-10 Kuniyoshida, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka, JPN, 422-8004
Rent Corp engages in the rental business of industrial vehicles, general passenger cars, industrial machinery and equipment, construction machinery and tools. It also provides calibration for measuring tools, battery regeneration, construction machine training and sale of equipment and used machines.
12GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSE:372A

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

円5,490.00
Price