Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Branding TechnologyTSE:7067 76 Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.56 as of Mar. 2026, which is 22% below its 10-year median of 2.01. GuruFocus rates TSE:7067 with a GF Score™ of 76/100 and a GF Value™ of 円983.94 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 690 Media - Diversified companies, Branding Technology ranks worse than 62.61% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
TSE:7067'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17 Med: 2.01 Max: 136.49
Current: 2.48
During the past 10 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Branding Technology was 136.49. The lowest was 0.17. And the median was 2.01.
TSE:7067's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 62.61% of 690
companies
in the Media - Diversified industry
Industry Median: 1.595
vs TSE:7067: 2.48
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Branding Technology Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Branding Technology Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
TSE:7067 vs APP, OMC, TTD: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison
For the Advertising Agencies subindustry, Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Branding Technology Debt-to-EBITDA vs Media - Diversified Industry
For the Media - Diversified industry and Communication Services sector, Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) EBITDA data.
Branding Technology (TSE:7067) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.56 as of Mar. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Branding Technology. This is 22% below median its historical median of 2.01. Over the past decade, Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 0.17 to 136.49. According to the industry distribution chart, Branding Technology ranks #432 out of 690 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, placing it in the top 62.6%.
Is Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Branding Technology's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.56 is 22% below median its 10-year median of 2.01. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 0.17 to a high of 136.49. The Media - Diversified industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.60. Branding Technology's value of 1.56 is 2.2% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Branding Technology ranks #432 out of 690 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Branding Technology has a GF Score™ of 76/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Branding Technology's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to APP and OMC?
According to the Media - Diversified industry distribution chart, Branding Technology ranks #432 out of 690 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Branding Technology in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.60. Branding Technology's value of 1.56 is 2.2% below this benchmark. Historically, Branding Technology's own Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 0.17 to 136.49 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 2.01 vs. the industry median of 1.60, Branding Technology has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Media - Diversified company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Media - Diversified companies is 1.60, based on 690 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Branding Technology's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 1.56 is 2.2% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Branding Technology. For the Media - Diversified industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.60 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Branding Technology's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.56, which is 22% below median its own 10-year median of 2.01. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Branding Technology stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Branding Technology (TSE:7067) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is 円983.94, compared to a current price of 円1,033.00 — trading 5% above its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.56, which is 22% below median its 10-year median of 2.01 and 2.2% below the Media - Diversified industry median of 1.60. Branding Technology's overall GF Score™ is 76/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Branding Technology (TSE:7067), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.56 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Branding Technology (TSE:7067) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Branding Technology stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of 円1,033.00 is trading 5% above its estimated GF Value™ of 円983.94.
GuruFocus considers Branding Technology to be Fairly Valued.
Key valuation signals for TSE:7067:
Debt-to-EBITDA: 1.56 (22% below median its 10-year median of 2.01)
GF Value™: 円983.94 vs. price of 円1,033.00 (5% above fair value)
Industry Position: 2.2% below the Media - Diversified median (#432 of 690)
No single metric tells the full story. See the TSE:7067 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Branding Technology Inc is engaged in brand development and digital marketing services. The company has two reportable segments: Brand Business and Digital Marketing Business. The Brand Business segment provides owned media creation, management support services, content marketing, in-house media operations, and dental clinic management consulting. The Digital Marketing Business segment offers internet advertising operations, digital tool support, on-site consulting, and SEO consulting services. It generates the majority of its revenue from the Digital Marketing Business.
76GF Score
Get the complete analysis for TSE:7067
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
TSE:7067 has been successfully added to your 
