Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
ChargePoint HoldingsBSP:C2HP34 27 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 10, 2026, which is 67% above its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates BSP:C2HP34 with a GF Score™ of 27/100 and a GF Value™ of R$27.19 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,102 Retail - Cyclical companies, ChargePoint Holdings ranks worse than 52% on this metric.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
ChargePoint Holdings has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The historical rank and industry rank for ChargePoint Holdings's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
BSP:C2HP34'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2 Med: 3 Max: 5
Current: 5
During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of ChargePoint Holdings was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
ChargePoint Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
ChargePoint Holdings Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for ChargePoint Holdings's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
BSP:C2HP34 vs HTLM, GRWG, BARK: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Specialty Retail subindustry, ChargePoint Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
ChargePoint Holdings Piotroski F-Score vs Retail - Cyclical Industry
For the Retail - Cyclical industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, ChargePoint Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where ChargePoint Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
This Year (Apr26) TTM:
Last Year (Apr25) TTM:
Net Income was -366.182 + -282.505 + -236.819 + -217.485 = R$-1,103 Mil. Cash Flow from Operations was -34.04 + -121.057 + -6.542 + -184.039 = R$-346 Mil. Revenue was 545.518 + 568.864 + 582.851 + 512.547 = R$2,210 Mil. Gross Profit was 170.024 + 174.879 + 183.418 + 149.114 = R$677 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Apr25)
to the end of this year (Apr26) was
(5197.599 + 4815.289 + 4565.131 + 4223.933 + 3629.387) / 5 = R$4486.2678 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of this year (Apr25) was R$5,198 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was R$1,176 Mil. Total Current Assets was R$2,019 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was R$1,760 Mil.
Net Income was -381.824 + -436.661 + -353.459 + -330.759 = R$-1,503 Mil.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
ChargePoint Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -1,103.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
ChargePoint Holdings's return on assets of this year was -0.21221164. ChargePoint Holdings's return on assets of last year was -0.27864883.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
ChargePoint Holdings's gearing of this year was 0.26215889. ChargePoint Holdings's gearing of last year was 0.34559656.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
ChargePoint Holdings's current ratio of this year was 1.14695845. ChargePoint Holdings's current ratio of last year was 1.82076454.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
ChargePoint Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 24.63. ChargePoint Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 22.952.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
ChargePoint Holdings's gross margin of this year was 0.30656219. ChargePoint Holdings's gross margin of last year was 0.25837683.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
ChargePoint Holdings's asset turnover of this year was 0.425154. ChargePoint Holdings's asset turnover of last year was 0.43393698.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
0
=
4
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
ChargePoint Holdings has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
ChargePoint Holdings (BSP:C2HP34) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Aug. 10, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on ChargePoint Holdings and its competitors. This is 67% above median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, ChargePoint Holdings' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, ChargePoint Holdings ranks #573 out of 1102 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry, placing it in the top 52%.
Is ChargePoint Holdings' Piotroski F-Score too high?
ChargePoint Holdings' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 67% above median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Retail - Cyclical industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. ChargePoint Holdings' value of 5 is 16.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, ChargePoint Holdings ranks #573 out of 1102 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, ChargePoint Holdings has a GF Score™ of 27/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does ChargePoint Holdings' Piotroski F-Score compare to HTLM and GRWG?
According to the Retail - Cyclical industry distribution chart, ChargePoint Holdings ranks #573 out of 1102 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places ChargePoint Holdings in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. ChargePoint Holdings' value of 5 is 16.7% below this benchmark. Historically, ChargePoint Holdings' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, ChargePoint Holdings has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Retail - Cyclical company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Retail - Cyclical companies is 6.00, based on 1,102 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. ChargePoint Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 16.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on ChargePoint Holdings and its competitors. For the Retail - Cyclical industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. ChargePoint Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 67% above median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is ChargePoint Holdings stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, ChargePoint Holdings (BSP:C2HP34) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is R$27.19, compared to a current price of R$9.24 — trading 66% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 67% above median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 16.7% below the Retail - Cyclical industry median of 6.00. ChargePoint Holdings' overall GF Score™ is 27/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For ChargePoint Holdings (BSP:C2HP34), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 10, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is ChargePoint Holdings (BSP:C2HP34) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, ChargePoint Holdings stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of R$9.24 is trading 66% below its estimated GF Value™ of R$27.19.
GuruFocus considers ChargePoint Holdings to be Possible Value Trap.
Key valuation signals for BSP:C2HP34:
Piotroski F-Score: 5 (67% above median its 10-year median of 3.00)
GF Value™: R$27.19 vs. price of R$9.24 (66% below fair value)
Industry Position: 16.7% below the Retail - Cyclical median (#573 of 1102)
No single metric tells the full story. See the BSP:C2HP34 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
ChargePoint Holdings Inc designs, develops, and markets networked electric vehicle charging system infrastructure and cloud-based services that enable charging systems owners, charge point operators, to manage their Networked Charging Systems, and to enable drivers to locate, reserve and authenticate Networked Charging Systems and to transact EV charging sessions on those systems. The company's hardware product lineup includes solutions across home, commercial, and fast-charging applications. The company derives the majority of its revenue from the United States.
27GF Score
Get the complete analysis for BSP:C2HP34
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
BSP:C2HP34 has been successfully added to your 
