NAP Nyrt (BUD:NAP) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jul. 01, 2026) — 20% Above Median


BUD:NAP NAP Nyrt BUD:NAP
46 GF Score
Price Ft1,410.00
GF Value Ft1,837.14
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score?

NAP Nyrt BUD:NAP +0.71% 46 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jul. 01, 2026, which is 20% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates BUD:NAP with a GF Score™ of 46/100 and a GF Value™ of Ft1,837.14 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 417 Utilities - Independent Power Producers companies, NAP Nyrt ranks better than 81.06% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NAP Nyrt has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BUD:NAP' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 6

During the past 6 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of NAP Nyrt was 6. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

NAP Nyrt  (BUD:NAP) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score Chart

NAP Nyrt Annual Data
Trend Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 5.00 4.00 3.00 6.00

NAP Nyrt Semi-Annual Data
Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 6.00

NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Utilities - Renewable subindustry, NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


NAP Nyrt Piotroski F-Score vs Utilities - Independent Power Producers Industry

For the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry and Utilities sector, NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BUD:NAP
46GF Score
NAP Nyrt BUD:NAP
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was Ft1,261 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was Ft2,468 Mil.
Revenue was Ft4,582 Mil.
Gross Profit was Ft3,351 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (36397.212 + 36358.03) / 2 = Ft36377.621 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was Ft36,397 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was Ft12,641 Mil.
Total Current Assets was Ft4,120 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was Ft3,326 Mil.
Net Income was Ft705 Mil.

Revenue was Ft2,925 Mil.
Gross Profit was Ft2,364 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (20738.481 + 36397.212) / 2 = Ft28567.8465 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was Ft20,738 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was Ft14,682 Mil.
Total Current Assets was Ft9,201 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was Ft8,042 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NAP Nyrt's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,261. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

NAP Nyrt's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 2,468. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=1261.029/36397.212
=0.03464631

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=704.58/20738.481
=0.03397452

NAP Nyrt's return on assets of this year was 0.03464631. NAP Nyrt's return on assets of last year was 0.03397452. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

NAP Nyrt's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,261. NAP Nyrt's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 2,468. ==> 2,468 > 1,261 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=12640.859/36377.621
=0.34748999

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=14681.856/28567.8465
=0.51392939

NAP Nyrt's gearing of this year was 0.34748999. NAP Nyrt's gearing of last year was 0.51392939. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4119.593/3325.519
=1.23878198

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=9201.292/8042.196
=1.1441268

NAP Nyrt's current ratio of this year was 1.23878198. NAP Nyrt's current ratio of last year was 1.1441268. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

NAP Nyrt's number of shares in issue this year was 8.848. NAP Nyrt's number of shares in issue last year was 8.399. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3350.838/4582.174
=0.7312769

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2364.39/2924.668
=0.80843022

NAP Nyrt's gross margin of this year was 0.7312769. NAP Nyrt's gross margin of last year was 0.80843022. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=4582.174/36397.212
=0.12589354

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=2924.668/20738.481
=0.14102614

NAP Nyrt's asset turnover of this year was 0.12589354. NAP Nyrt's asset turnover of last year was 0.14102614. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+0+0+0
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

NAP Nyrt has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
NAP Nyrt (BUD:NAP) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jul. 01, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NAP Nyrt and its competitors. This is 20% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, NAP Nyrt ranks #79 out of 417 companies in the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry, placing it in the top 18.9%.
Is NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score too high?
NAP Nyrt's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 6.00. The Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NAP Nyrt's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, NAP Nyrt ranks #79 out of 417 companies in the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, NAP Nyrt has a GF Score™ of 46/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does NAP Nyrt's Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry distribution chart, NAP Nyrt ranks #79 out of 417 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places NAP Nyrt in the top 19% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. NAP Nyrt's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, NAP Nyrt's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, NAP Nyrt has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Utilities - Independent Power Producers company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Utilities - Independent Power Producers companies is 5.00, based on 417 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. NAP Nyrt's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on NAP Nyrt and its competitors. For the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. NAP Nyrt's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is NAP Nyrt stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NAP Nyrt (BUD:NAP) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is Ft1,837.14, compared to a current price of Ft1,410.00 — trading 23.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% above the Utilities - Independent Power Producers industry median of 5.00. NAP Nyrt's overall GF Score™ is 46/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For NAP Nyrt (BUD:NAP), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jul. 01, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is NAP Nyrt (BUD:NAP) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, NAP Nyrt stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of Ft1,410.00 is trading 23.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of Ft1,837.14. GuruFocus considers NAP Nyrt to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for BUD:NAP:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: Ft1,837.14 vs. price of Ft1,410.00 (23.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 46/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Utilities - Independent Power Producers median (#79 of 417)

No single metric tells the full story. See the BUD:NAP stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


NAP Nyrt Business Description

Address Timar utca 20, Budapest, HUN, 1034
NAP Nyrt is a renewable electricity producer company. It acquires project companies that own solar power plants and by carrying out solar power plant investments.
46GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BUD:NAP

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

Ft1,410.00
Price
Ft1,837.14
GF Value