CRSF (Crisp Momentum) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Aug. 19, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Crisp Momentum Piotroski F-Score?

Crisp Momentum CRSF Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 19, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. The stock has 4 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,002 Media - Diversified companies, Crisp Momentum ranks worse than 60.38% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Crisp Momentum has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CRSF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 4   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 6 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Crisp Momentum was 6. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.

Crisp Momentum  (OTCPK:CRSF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Crisp Momentum Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Crisp Momentum Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Crisp Momentum Piotroski F-Score Chart

Crisp Momentum Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Jul22 Jul23 Jul24 Jul25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A N/A 5.00 4.00 4.00

Crisp Momentum Quarterly Data
Dec20 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24 Apr24 Jul24 Oct24 Jan25 Apr25 Jul25 Oct25 Jan26 Apr26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 4.00 N/A 3.00 4.00

CRSF vs GAIA, RDI, CNVS: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Entertainment subindustry, Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Crisp Momentum Piotroski F-Score vs Media - Diversified Industry

For the Media - Diversified industry and Communication Services sector, Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Apr26) TTM:Last Year (Apr25) TTM:
Net Income was -7.633 + -1.047 + -5.988 + -4.563 = $-19.23 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.265 + -0.731 + -1.256 + -0.498 = $-2.75 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0.003 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0.003 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Apr25)
to the end of this year (Apr26) was
(0.005 + 0.305 + 5.624 + 3.805 + 1.336) / 5 = $2.215 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Apr25) was $0.01 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1.34 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.28 Mil.
Net Income was -0.112 + -0.053 + -0.282 + -0.118 = $-0.57 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Apr24)
to the end of last year (Apr25) was
(0.017 + 0.005 + 0 + 0.019 + 0.005) / 5 = $0.0115 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Apr24) was $0.02 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.01 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.10 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Crisp Momentum's current Net Income (TTM) was -19.23. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Crisp Momentum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.75. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Apr25)
=-19.231/0.005
=-3846.2

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Apr24)
=-0.565/0.017
=-33.23529412

Crisp Momentum's return on assets of this year was -3846.2. Crisp Momentum's return on assets of last year was -33.23529412. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Crisp Momentum's current Net Income (TTM) was -19.23. Crisp Momentum's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.75. ==> -2.75 > -19.23 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Apr26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Apr25 to Apr26
=0/2.215
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Apr25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Apr24 to Apr25
=0/0.0115
=0

Crisp Momentum's gearing of this year was 0. Crisp Momentum's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Apr26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.336/1.283
=1.04130943

Current Ratio (Last Year: Apr25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.005/0.102
=0.04901961

Crisp Momentum's current ratio of this year was 1.04130943. Crisp Momentum's current ratio of last year was 0.04901961. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Crisp Momentum's number of shares in issue this year was 2049.621. Crisp Momentum's number of shares in issue last year was 168.074. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.003/0.003
=1

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Crisp Momentum's gross margin of this year was 1. Crisp Momentum's gross margin of last year was . ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Apr25)
=0.003/0.005
=0.6

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Apr24)
=0/0.017
=0

Crisp Momentum's asset turnover of this year was 0.6. Crisp Momentum's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+1+0+1+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Crisp Momentum has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Crisp Momentum (CRSF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Aug. 19, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Crisp Momentum and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Crisp Momentum ranks #605 out of 1002 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, placing it in the top 60.4%.
Is Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Crisp Momentum's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 6.00. The Media - Diversified industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Crisp Momentum's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Crisp Momentum ranks #605 out of 1002 companies in the Media - Diversified industry, which is below the industry midpoint.
How does Crisp Momentum's Piotroski F-Score compare to GAIA and RDI?
According to the Media - Diversified industry distribution chart, Crisp Momentum ranks #605 out of 1002 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Crisp Momentum in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Crisp Momentum's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Crisp Momentum's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Crisp Momentum has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Media - Diversified company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Media - Diversified companies is 5.00, based on 1,002 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Crisp Momentum's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Crisp Momentum and its competitors. For the Media - Diversified industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Crisp Momentum's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Crisp Momentum stock overvalued right now?
Crisp Momentum (CRSF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Media - Diversified industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Crisp Momentum (CRSF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 19, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Crisp Momentum Business Description

Address 250 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA, 10177
Crisp Momentum Incis a U.S. based public world-wide media company focused on IP monetization through short form scripted video content, inspired by the Duanju genre. Crisp works with a diverse range of partners to produce vertical video content across multiple genres from romantic drama to animation and beyond.