TI Cloud (HKSE:02167) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Aug. 06, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

HKSE:02167 TI Cloud Inc HKSE:02167
77 GF Score
Price HK$2.90
GF Value HK$4.42
Valuation Significantly Undervalued
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is TI Cloud Piotroski F-Score?

TI Cloud HKSE:02167 -3.50% 77 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates HKSE:02167 with a GF Score™ of 77/100 and a GF Value™ of HK$4.42 (Significantly Undervalued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,728 Software companies, TI Cloud ranks better than 59.57% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TI Cloud has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

HKSE:02167' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of TI Cloud was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

TI Cloud  (HKSE:02167) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


TI Cloud Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


TI Cloud Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

TI Cloud Piotroski F-Score Chart

TI Cloud Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 5.00 3.00 4.00 8.00 5.00

TI Cloud Semi-Annual Data
Dec19 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 5.00

HKSE:02167 vs MSFT, ORCL, PLTR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Infrastructure subindustry, TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


TI Cloud Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


HKSE:02167
77GF Score
TI Cloud Inc HKSE:02167
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was HK$67.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$47.0 Mil.
Revenue was HK$607.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$306.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (688.753 + 781.433) / 2 = HK$735.093 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was HK$688.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$4.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$567.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$171.3 Mil.
Net Income was HK$36.3 Mil.

Revenue was HK$540.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$280.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (663.493 + 688.753) / 2 = HK$676.123 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was HK$663.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$2.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$518.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$143.9 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TI Cloud's current Net Income (TTM) was 67.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TI Cloud's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 47.0. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=67.192/688.753
=0.09755602

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=36.301/663.493
=0.05471196

TI Cloud's return on assets of this year was 0.09755602. TI Cloud's return on assets of last year was 0.05471196. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

TI Cloud's current Net Income (TTM) was 67.2. TI Cloud's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 47.0. ==> 47.0 <= 67.2 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=4.455/735.093
=0.00606046

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=2.183/676.123
=0.0032287

TI Cloud's gearing of this year was 0.00606046. TI Cloud's gearing of last year was 0.0032287. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=567.666/171.273
=3.31439281

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=518.27/143.883
=3.60202387

TI Cloud's current ratio of this year was 3.31439281. TI Cloud's current ratio of last year was 3.60202387. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

TI Cloud's number of shares in issue this year was 173.814. TI Cloud's number of shares in issue last year was 173.938. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=306.191/607.251
=0.50422478

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=280.153/540.621
=0.51820592

TI Cloud's gross margin of this year was 0.50422478. TI Cloud's gross margin of last year was 0.51820592. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=607.251/688.753
=0.8816673

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=540.621/663.493
=0.8148104

TI Cloud's asset turnover of this year was 0.8816673. TI Cloud's asset turnover of last year was 0.8148104. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+0+0+1+0+1
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TI Cloud has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
TI Cloud (HKSE:02167) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on TI Cloud and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, TI Cloud ranks #1103 out of 2728 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 40.4%.
Is TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score too high?
TI Cloud's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. TI Cloud's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, TI Cloud ranks #1103 out of 2728 companies in the Software industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, TI Cloud has a GF Score™ of 77/100 and is considered Significantly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does TI Cloud's Piotroski F-Score compare to MSFT and ORCL?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, TI Cloud ranks #1103 out of 2728 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts TI Cloud in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. TI Cloud's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, TI Cloud's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, TI Cloud has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,728 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. TI Cloud's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on TI Cloud and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. TI Cloud's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is TI Cloud stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, TI Cloud (HKSE:02167) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is HK$4.42, compared to a current price of HK$2.90 — trading 34.5% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Software industry median of 5.00. TI Cloud's overall GF Score™ is 77/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For TI Cloud (HKSE:02167), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 06, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is TI Cloud (HKSE:02167) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, TI Cloud stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of HK$2.90 is trading 34.5% below its estimated GF Value™ of HK$4.42. GuruFocus considers TI Cloud to be Significantly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for HKSE:02167:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: HK$4.42 vs. price of HK$2.90 (34.5% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 77/100 with 2 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Software median (#1103 of 2728)

No single metric tells the full story. See the HKSE:02167 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


TI Cloud Business Description

Address Ronghua South Road, 28th-29th Floor, No.1 Building, 2nd Compound, Beijing Economic and Technological Development Zon, Beijing, CHN, 100176
TI Cloud Inc is an investment holding company. Along with its subsidiaries were principally offers a broad array of cloud-native customer contact solutions, which are communication solutions that enable enterprises to engage in multi-channel customer interactions. The group operates in one segment, which is the provision of artificial intelligence-based cloud customer contact solution software and related services in the Software as a Service (SaaS) model and Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) model. The company generates the majority of its revenue from the SaaS Model, followed by Cloud Contact Center Solutions, and VPC and Other Solutions. Geographically, it operates in Hong Kong and Mainland China. The company generates the majority of its revenue from Mainland China.
77GF Score

Get the complete analysis for HKSE:02167

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

HK$2.90
Price
HK$4.42
GF Value