Columbus AS (LTS:0NPJ) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — 40% Below Median


LTS:0NPJ Columbus AS LTS:0NPJ
69 GF Score
Price kr9.94
GF Value kr9.42
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Columbus AS Piotroski F-Score?

Columbus AS LTS:0NPJ 69 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates LTS:0NPJ with a GF Score™ of 69/100 and a GF Value™ of kr9.42 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,744 Software companies, Columbus AS ranks worse than 78.94% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Columbus AS has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LTS:0NPJ' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Columbus AS was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Columbus AS  (LTS:0NPJ) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Columbus AS Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Columbus AS Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Columbus AS Piotroski F-Score Chart

Columbus AS Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 6.00

Columbus AS Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 3.00

LTS:0NPJ vs IBM, ACN, FISV: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Columbus AS Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


LTS:0NPJ
69GF Score
Columbus AS LTS:0NPJ
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -8.842 + -9.637 + 7.184 + 9.355 = kr-2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 17.958 + 7.245 + 34.486 + -3.528 = kr56 Mil.
Revenue was 409.887 + 347.144 + 385.47 + 418.047 = kr1,561 Mil.
Gross Profit was 96.91 + 310.562 + -661.316 + 370.032 = kr116 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(1367.301 + 1295.76 + 1273.242 + 1275.745 + 1279.898) / 5 = kr1298.3892 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was kr1,367 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr141 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr455 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr389 Mil.
Net Income was -14.763 + 4.767 + 29.312 + 26.105 = kr45 Mil.

Revenue was 426.899 + 371.428 + 416.876 + 433.955 = kr1,649 Mil.
Gross Profit was 96.794 + 334.676 + -685.572 + 387.45 = kr133 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1352.682 + 1348.286 + 1271.247 + 1295.435 + 1367.301) / 5 = kr1326.9902 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was kr1,353 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr152 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr505 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr413 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Columbus AS's current Net Income (TTM) was -2. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Columbus AS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-1.94/1367.301
=-0.00141885

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=45.421/1352.682
=0.03357848

Columbus AS's return on assets of this year was -0.00141885. Columbus AS's return on assets of last year was 0.03357848. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Columbus AS's current Net Income (TTM) was -2. Columbus AS's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 56. ==> 56 > -2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=140.562/1298.3892
=0.10825876

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=152.132/1326.9902
=0.1146444

Columbus AS's gearing of this year was 0.10825876. Columbus AS's gearing of last year was 0.1146444. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=454.693/389.403
=1.16766692

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=504.806/413.165
=1.22180243

Columbus AS's current ratio of this year was 1.16766692. Columbus AS's current ratio of last year was 1.22180243. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Columbus AS's number of shares in issue this year was 129.367. Columbus AS's number of shares in issue last year was 129.276. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=116.188/1560.548
=0.07445333

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=133.348/1649.158
=0.08085823

Columbus AS's gross margin of this year was 0.07445333. Columbus AS's gross margin of last year was 0.08085823. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1560.548/1367.301
=1.14133464

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1649.158/1352.682
=1.21917642

Columbus AS's asset turnover of this year was 1.14133464. Columbus AS's asset turnover of last year was 1.21917642. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Columbus AS has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Columbus AS (LTS:0NPJ) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Columbus AS and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Columbus AS ranks #2166 out of 2744 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 78.9%.
Is Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Columbus AS's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 8.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Columbus AS's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Columbus AS ranks #2166 out of 2744 companies in the Software industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Columbus AS has a GF Score™ of 69/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Columbus AS's Piotroski F-Score compare to IBM and ACN?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Columbus AS ranks #2166 out of 2744 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Columbus AS in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Columbus AS's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Columbus AS's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Columbus AS has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,744 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Columbus AS's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Columbus AS and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Columbus AS's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Columbus AS stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Columbus AS (LTS:0NPJ) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is kr9.42, compared to a current price of kr9.94 — trading 5.5% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% below the Software industry median of 5.00. Columbus AS's overall GF Score™ is 69/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Columbus AS (LTS:0NPJ), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Columbus AS (LTS:0NPJ) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Columbus AS stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of kr9.94 is trading 5.5% above its estimated GF Value™ of kr9.42. GuruFocus considers Columbus AS to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for LTS:0NPJ:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: kr9.42 vs. price of kr9.94 (5.5% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 69/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Software median (#2166 of 2744)

No single metric tells the full story. See the LTS:0NPJ stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Columbus AS Business Description

Other Exchanges COLUM:DenmarkP1F:Germany
Address Lautrupvang 6, Ballerup, DNK, DK-2750
Columbus AS is a digital consultancy company. The group specialises in solving complex challenges for customers in the manufacturing, retail and distribution, food and beverage, and life science industries. It delivers business-critical solutions in areas such as CloudERP, Data & Analytics, Application Management, Digital Commerce, Cybersecurity, AI Innovation, and ESG. The company's geographical segments include Sweden, Denmark, Norway, the UK, the U.S., and Other.
69GF Score

Get the complete analysis for LTS:0NPJ

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

kr9.94
Price
kr9.42
GF Value