Marlin Global (NZSE:MLN) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 20% Below Median


NZSE:MLN Marlin Global Ltd NZSE:MLN
23 GF Score
Price NZ$0.77
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is Marlin Global Piotroski F-Score?

Marlin Global NZSE:MLN -1.03% 23 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates NZSE:MLN with a GF Score™ of 23/100. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 1,597 Asset Management companies, Marlin Global ranks worse than 56.79% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Marlin Global has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NZSE:MLN' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Marlin Global was 6. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Marlin Global  (NZSE:MLN) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Marlin Global Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Marlin Global Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Marlin Global Piotroski F-Score Chart

Marlin Global Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00

Marlin Global Semi-Annual Data
Dec12 Jun13 Dec13 Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 4.00

NZSE:MLN vs BLK, BX, KKR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Marlin Global Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NZSE:MLN
23GF Score
Marlin Global Ltd NZSE:MLN
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun25) TTM:Last Year (Jun24) TTM:
Net Income was NZ$0.33 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was NZ$7.16 Mil.
Revenue was NZ$3.60 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun24)
to the end of this year (Jun25) was (225.433 + 214.936) / 2 = NZ$220.1845 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun24) was NZ$225.43 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NZ$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was NZ$214.94 Mil.
Total Liabilities was NZ$2.86 Mil.
Net Income was NZ$37.19 Mil.

Revenue was NZ$39.42 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun23)
to the end of last year (Jun24) was (202.366 + 225.433) / 2 = NZ$213.8995 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun23) was NZ$202.37 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NZ$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was NZ$225.43 Mil.
Total Liabilities was NZ$2.53 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Marlin Global's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.33. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Marlin Global's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 7.16. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=0.331/225.433
=0.00146829

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun23)
=37.191/202.366
=0.18378087

Marlin Global's return on assets of this year was 0.00146829. Marlin Global's return on assets of last year was 0.18378087. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Marlin Global's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.33. Marlin Global's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 7.16. ==> 7.16 > 0.33 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=0/220.1845
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun23 to Jun24
=0/213.8995
=0

Marlin Global's gearing of this year was 0. Marlin Global's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=214.936/2.86
=75.15244755

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=225.433/2.529
=89.13918545

Marlin Global's current ratio of this year was 75.15244755. Marlin Global's current ratio of last year was 89.13918545. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Marlin Global's number of shares in issue this year was 218.776. Marlin Global's number of shares in issue last year was 211.455. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=0.331/3.597
=0.09202113

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=37.191/39.417
=0.9435269

Marlin Global's net margin of this year was 0.09202113. Marlin Global's net margin of last year was 0.9435269. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun24)
=3.597/225.433
=0.01595596

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun23)
=39.417/202.366
=0.19478074

Marlin Global's asset turnover of this year was 0.01595596. Marlin Global's asset turnover of last year was 0.19478074. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Marlin Global has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Marlin Global (NZSE:MLN) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Marlin Global and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Marlin Global ranks #907 out of 1597 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 56.8%.
Is Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Marlin Global's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 6.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Marlin Global's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Marlin Global ranks #907 out of 1597 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Marlin Global has a GF Score™ of 23/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Marlin Global's Piotroski F-Score compare to BLK and BX?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Marlin Global ranks #907 out of 1597 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Marlin Global in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Marlin Global's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Marlin Global's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Marlin Global has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,597 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Marlin Global's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Marlin Global and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Marlin Global's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Marlin Global stock overvalued right now?
Marlin Global (NZSE:MLN) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. Marlin Global's overall GF Score™ is 23/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Marlin Global (NZSE:MLN), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Marlin Global Business Description

Address 67-73 Hurstmere Road, Level 1, Takapuna, Auckland, NTL, NZL, 0622
Marlin Global Ltd is an investment company that invests in growing companies based outside of New Zealand and Australia. The portfolio of the company is managed by Fisher Funds Management Limited. Its objective is to offer investors competitive returns through capital growth and dividends, and access to a diversified portfolio of investments through a single tax-efficient investment vehicle. The Company operates in a single operating segment, which is international financial investment.
23GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NZSE:MLN

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

NZ$0.77
Price