GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Ferroamp AB (OSTO:FERRO) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Ferroamp AB (OSTO:FERRO) Piotroski F-Score : 2 (As of Jun. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2019. Start your Free Trial

What is Ferroamp AB Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ferroamp AB has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

OSTO:FERRO' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 2

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ferroamp AB was 6. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.


Ferroamp AB Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Ferroamp AB Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ferroamp AB Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Nov18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 2.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 3.00

Ferroamp AB Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00

Competitive Comparison of Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score

For the Electrical Equipment & Parts subindustry, Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was -7.854 + -29.698 + -38.787 + -23.353 = kr-99.7 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -2.352 + -119.619 + -56.807 + -20.872 = kr-199.7 Mil.
Revenue was 143.21 + 42.98 + 74.012 + 33.367 = kr293.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 48.418 + 23.385 + 33.043 + 17.93 = kr122.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(245.997 + 446.486 + 398.592 + 366.489 + 368.717) / 5 = kr365.2562 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was kr246.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr4.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr225.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr110.8 Mil.
Net Income was -7.859 + -11.1 + -29.28 + -30.692 = kr-78.9 Mil.

Revenue was 52.402 + 47.965 + 63.204 + 95.051 = kr258.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 24.791 + 20.547 + 18.401 + 17.783 = kr81.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(196.091 + 253.09 + 249.775 + 239.509 + 245.997) / 5 = kr236.8924 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was kr196.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was kr0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was kr157.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was kr110.0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ferroamp AB's current Net Income (TTM) was -99.7. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ferroamp AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -199.7. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=-99.692/245.997
=-0.40525697

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=-78.931/196.091
=-0.4025223

Ferroamp AB's return on assets of this year was -0.40525697. Ferroamp AB's return on assets of last year was -0.4025223. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ferroamp AB's current Net Income (TTM) was -99.7. Ferroamp AB's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -199.7. ==> -199.7 <= -99.7 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=4.885/365.2562
=0.01337417

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=0/236.8924
=0

Ferroamp AB's gearing of this year was 0.01337417. Ferroamp AB's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=225.669/110.843
=2.03593371

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=157.518/110.046
=1.43138324

Ferroamp AB's current ratio of this year was 2.03593371. Ferroamp AB's current ratio of last year was 1.43138324. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ferroamp AB's number of shares in issue this year was 30.872. Ferroamp AB's number of shares in issue last year was 14.701. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=122.776/293.569
=0.41821854

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=81.522/258.622
=0.3152168

Ferroamp AB's gross margin of this year was 0.41821854. Ferroamp AB's gross margin of last year was 0.3152168. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=293.569/245.997
=1.19338447

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=258.622/196.091
=1.31888766

Ferroamp AB's asset turnover of this year was 1.19338447. Ferroamp AB's asset turnover of last year was 1.31888766. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+0+0+1+0+1+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ferroamp AB has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Ferroamp AB  (OSTO:FERRO) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ferroamp AB Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Ferroamp AB's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Ferroamp AB (OSTO:FERRO) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Domnarvsgatan 16, Spanga, SWE, 16353
Ferroamp AB offers energy and power optimization solutions for real estate. The technology offered by the company includes Solar string optimizer, Energy storage optimizer, Fireman switch, Adaptive equalization, and other Energy storage solutions. The group mainly serves property companies, energy consultants, and electric power companies.

Ferroamp AB (OSTO:FERRO) Headlines

No Headlines