PLOW (Douglas Dynamics) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Aug. 20, 2026) — 40% Above Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

PLOW Douglas Dynamics Inc PLOW
77 GF Score
Price $41.63
GF Value $34.12
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is Douglas Dynamics Piotroski F-Score?

Douglas Dynamics PLOW +0.39% 77 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Aug. 20, 2026, which is 40% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates PLOW with a GF Score™ of 77/100 and a GF Value™ of $34.12 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 1,278 Vehicles & Parts companies, Douglas Dynamics ranks better than 88.81% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Douglas Dynamics has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Douglas Dynamics's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

PLOW' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Douglas Dynamics was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Douglas Dynamics  (NYSE:PLOW) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Douglas Dynamics Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Douglas Dynamics Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Douglas Dynamics's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Douglas Dynamics Piotroski F-Score Chart

Douglas Dynamics Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 3.00 6.00 7.00

Douglas Dynamics Quarterly Data
Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

PLOW vs XPEL, SMP, DCH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Auto Parts subindustry, Douglas Dynamics's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Douglas Dynamics Piotroski F-Score vs Vehicles & Parts Industry

For the Vehicles & Parts industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Douglas Dynamics's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Douglas Dynamics's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


PLOW
77GF Score
Douglas Dynamics Inc PLOW
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun26) TTM:Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 7.96 + 12.835 + 6.376 + 25.379 = $52.6 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -8.516 + 95.927 + -0.994 + -24.201 = $62.2 Mil.
Revenue was 162.121 + 184.538 + 137.797 + 214.648 = $699.1 Mil.
Gross Profit was 38.107 + 48.138 + 37.771 + 66.796 = $190.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(671.471 + 694.936 + 626.701 + 630.291 + 725.669) / 5 = $669.8136 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was $671.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $211.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $342.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $158.4 Mil.
Net Income was 32.258 + 7.907 + 0.148 + 25.954 = $66.3 Mil.

Revenue was 129.398 + 143.549 + 115.067 + 194.327 = $582.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 30.875 + 35.739 + 28.139 + 60.296 = $155.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(616.967 + 665.587 + 589.983 + 621.04 + 671.471) / 5 = $633.0096 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was $617.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $199.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $326.7 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $154.7 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Douglas Dynamics's current Net Income (TTM) was 52.6. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Douglas Dynamics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun25)
=52.55/671.471
=0.07826101

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=66.267/616.967
=0.10740769

Douglas Dynamics's return on assets of this year was 0.07826101. Douglas Dynamics's return on assets of last year was 0.10740769. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Douglas Dynamics's current Net Income (TTM) was 52.6. Douglas Dynamics's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.2. ==> 62.2 > 52.6 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun25 to Jun26
=211.646/669.8136
=0.31597746

Gearing (Last Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=199.635/633.0096
=0.31537436

Douglas Dynamics's gearing of this year was 0.31597746. Douglas Dynamics's gearing of last year was 0.31537436. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=342.378/158.377
=2.16179117

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=326.749/154.669
=2.11256942

Douglas Dynamics's current ratio of this year was 2.16179117. Douglas Dynamics's current ratio of last year was 2.11256942. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Douglas Dynamics's number of shares in issue this year was 23.59. Douglas Dynamics's number of shares in issue last year was 23.674. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=190.812/699.104
=0.27293793

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=155.049/582.341
=0.26625122

Douglas Dynamics's gross margin of this year was 0.27293793. Douglas Dynamics's gross margin of last year was 0.26625122. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun25)
=699.104/671.471
=1.04115293

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun24)
=582.341/616.967
=0.94387706

Douglas Dynamics's asset turnover of this year was 1.04115293. Douglas Dynamics's asset turnover of last year was 0.94387706. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+1+1+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Douglas Dynamics has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
Douglas Dynamics (PLOW) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Aug. 20, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Douglas Dynamics and its competitors. This is 40% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Douglas Dynamics' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Douglas Dynamics ranks #143 out of 1278 companies in the Vehicles & Parts industry, placing it in the top 11.2%.
Is Douglas Dynamics' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Douglas Dynamics' current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Vehicles & Parts industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Douglas Dynamics' value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Douglas Dynamics ranks #143 out of 1278 companies in the Vehicles & Parts industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Douglas Dynamics has a GF Score™ of 77/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Douglas Dynamics' Piotroski F-Score compare to XPEL and SMP?
According to the Vehicles & Parts industry distribution chart, Douglas Dynamics ranks #143 out of 1278 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Douglas Dynamics in the top 11% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Douglas Dynamics' value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, Douglas Dynamics' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Douglas Dynamics has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Vehicles & Parts company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Vehicles & Parts companies is 5.00, based on 1,278 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Douglas Dynamics's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Douglas Dynamics and its competitors. For the Vehicles & Parts industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Douglas Dynamics's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 40% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Douglas Dynamics stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Douglas Dynamics (PLOW) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $34.12, compared to a current price of $41.63 — trading 22% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% above the Vehicles & Parts industry median of 5.00. Douglas Dynamics' overall GF Score™ is 77/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Aug. 20, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Douglas Dynamics (PLOW) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Douglas Dynamics stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $41.63 is trading 22% above its estimated GF Value™ of $34.12. GuruFocus considers Douglas Dynamics to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for PLOW:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (40% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $34.12 vs. price of $41.63 (22% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 77/100 with 1 warning sign
  • Industry Position: 40% above the Vehicles & Parts median (#143 of 1278)

No single metric tells the full story. See the PLOW stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Douglas Dynamics Business Description

Other Exchanges 5D4:Germany
Address 11270 West Park Place, Suite 300, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 53224
Douglas Dynamics Inc is a manufacturer and upfitter of commercial vehicle attachments and equipment. The Company's portfolio includes snow and ice management attachments sold under the BLIZZARD, FISHER, HENDERSON, SNOWEX, and WESTERN brands, turf care equipment under the TURFEX brand, and industrial maintenance equipment under the SWEEPEX brand. The Company's portfolio also includes the upfit of attachments and storage solutions under the HENDERSON brand, and the DEJANA brand and its related sub-brands. The Company also leases fifteen manufacturing upfit and service facilities located in Iowa, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. The Company conducts business in two segments: Work Truck Attachments and Work Truck Solutions.
77GF Score

Get the complete analysis for PLOW

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$41.63
Price
$34.12
GF Value