China Energy Engineering (SHSE:601868) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jul. 04, 2026) — Near Median


SHSE:601868 China Energy Engineering Corporation Ltd SHSE:601868
67 GF Score
Price ¥2.66
GF Value ¥2.83
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is China Energy Engineering Piotroski F-Score?

China Energy Engineering SHSE:601868 67 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 04, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates SHSE:601868 with a GF Score™ of 67/100 and a GF Value™ of ¥2.83 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,731 Construction companies, China Energy Engineering ranks better than 52.74% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Energy Engineering has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SHSE:601868' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 5

During the past 12 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of China Energy Engineering was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 5.

China Energy Engineering  (SHSE:601868) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China Energy Engineering Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


China Energy Engineering Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

China Energy Engineering Piotroski F-Score Chart

China Energy Engineering Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 7.00 5.00 5.00

China Energy Engineering Quarterly Data
Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 N/A 4.00 5.00

SHSE:601868 vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


China Energy Engineering Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


SHSE:601868
67GF Score
China Energy Engineering Corporation Ltd SHSE:601868
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Sep24) TTM:
Net Income was 4791.89 + 0 + 354.288 + 2684.168 = ¥7,830 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 23545.61 + 0 + 4290.643 + 20659.955 = ¥48,496 Mil.
Revenue was 141574.036 + 0 + 111453.239 + 129385.131 = ¥382,412 Mil.
Gross Profit was 20125.128 + 0 + 11399.455 + 19882.992 = ¥51,408 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was
(858126.846 + 869004.776 + 938735.064 + 945671.125 + 941597.382) / 5 = ¥910627.0386 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep24) was ¥858,127 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥250,323 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥462,175 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥466,811 Mil.
Net Income was 4912.817 + 1480.915 + 1300.966 + 822.396 = ¥8,517 Mil.

Revenue was 120718.885 + 97403.938 + 96857.821 + 100876.962 = ¥415,858 Mil.
Gross Profit was 20066.396 + 10432.37 + 13257.03 + 10368.465 = ¥54,124 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep23)
to the end of last year (Sep24) was
(762654.929 + 783156.193 + 815466.108 + 849231.871 + 858126.846) / 5 = ¥813727.1894 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep23) was ¥762,655 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥210,742 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥475,826 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥438,871 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Energy Engineering's current Net Income (TTM) was 7,830. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Energy Engineering's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 48,496. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep24)
=7830.346/858126.846
=0.00912493

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=8517.094/762654.929
=0.01116769

China Energy Engineering's return on assets of this year was 0.00912493. China Energy Engineering's return on assets of last year was 0.01116769. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China Energy Engineering's current Net Income (TTM) was 7,830. China Energy Engineering's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 48,496. ==> 48,496 > 7,830 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep24 to Dec25
=250323.14/910627.0386
=0.27489096

Gearing (Last Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=210742.253/813727.1894
=0.25898391

China Energy Engineering's gearing of this year was 0.27489096. China Energy Engineering's gearing of last year was 0.25898391. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=462174.853/466810.782
=0.99006893

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=475825.658/438871.033
=1.08420384

China Energy Engineering's current ratio of this year was 0.99006893. China Energy Engineering's current ratio of last year was 1.08420384. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China Energy Engineering's number of shares in issue this year was 44925.338. China Energy Engineering's number of shares in issue last year was 45053.463. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=51407.575/382412.406
=0.13442967

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=54124.261/415857.606
=0.13015095

China Energy Engineering's gross margin of this year was 0.13442967. China Energy Engineering's gross margin of last year was 0.13015095. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep24)
=382412.406/858126.846
=0.44563622

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep23)
=415857.606/762654.929
=0.54527623

China Energy Engineering's asset turnover of this year was 0.44563622. China Energy Engineering's asset turnover of last year was 0.54527623. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+0+1+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Energy Engineering has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
China Energy Engineering (SHSE:601868) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jul. 04, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Energy Engineering and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, China Energy Engineering ranks #818 out of 1731 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 47.3%.
Is China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score too high?
China Energy Engineering's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 7.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Energy Engineering's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, China Energy Engineering ranks #818 out of 1731 companies in the Construction industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, China Energy Engineering has a GF Score™ of 67/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does China Energy Engineering's Piotroski F-Score compare to PWR and FIX?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, China Energy Engineering ranks #818 out of 1731 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts China Energy Engineering in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. China Energy Engineering's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, China Energy Engineering's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, China Energy Engineering has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,731 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. China Energy Engineering's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Energy Engineering and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. China Energy Engineering's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is China Energy Engineering stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Energy Engineering (SHSE:601868) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is ¥2.83, compared to a current price of ¥2.66 — trading 6% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Construction industry median of 5.00. China Energy Engineering's overall GF Score™ is 67/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For China Energy Engineering (SHSE:601868), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jul. 04, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is China Energy Engineering (SHSE:601868) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Energy Engineering stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of ¥2.66 is trading 6% below its estimated GF Value™ of ¥2.83. GuruFocus considers China Energy Engineering to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for SHSE:601868:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: ¥2.83 vs. price of ¥2.66 (6% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 67/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Construction median (#818 of 1731)

No single metric tells the full story. See the SHSE:601868 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


China Energy Engineering Business Description

Other Exchanges 03996:Hong Kong2E5:Germany
Address No. 26A West Dawang Road, Building 1, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CHN, 100022
China Energy Engineering Corporation Ltd focused on two core main businesses of energy power and water conservancy, coordinately expanded nine related diversified businesses of green transportation, green buildings and municipal administration, digital infrastructure (artificial intelligence), new materials, civil explosives, ecological and environmental protection, highend equipment, urban development and operation (real estate), and industrial finance, comprehensively constructed a new coordinated development layout of 2+9 businesses, formed five business sectors of survey, design and consulting services, construction and contracting, industrial manufacturing, investment and operation, and others, and has the integrated service capabilities covering the whole industry chain.
67GF Score

Get the complete analysis for SHSE:601868

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

¥2.66
Price
¥2.83
GF Value