SUND (Sundance Strategies) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Aug. 09, 2026) — 33% Below Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

SUND Sundance Strategies Inc SUND
26 GF Score
Price $0.20
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Sundance Strategies Piotroski F-Score?

Sundance Strategies SUND -7.19% 26 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Aug. 09, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates SUND with a GF Score™ of 26/100. The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 489 Insurance companies, Sundance Strategies ranks worse than 96.32% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sundance Strategies has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Sundance Strategies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SUND' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 5
Current: 2

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Sundance Strategies was 5. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Sundance Strategies  (OTCPK:SUND) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Sundance Strategies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Sundance Strategies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Sundance Strategies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sundance Strategies Piotroski F-Score Chart

Sundance Strategies Annual Data
Trend Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00

Sundance Strategies Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

SUND vs ZBAO, GOCOQ, HUIZ: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Insurance - Diversified subindustry, Sundance Strategies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Sundance Strategies Piotroski F-Score vs Insurance Industry

For the Insurance industry and Financial Services sector, Sundance Strategies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Sundance Strategies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


SUND
26GF Score
Sundance Strategies Inc SUND
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.608 + -0.191 + -0.221 + -0.795 = $-1.82 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.113 + -0.08 + -0.129 + -0.068 = $-0.39 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0.178 + 0.061 + 0.018 + 0.054 + 0.041) / 5 = $0.0704 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $0.18 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $3.60 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.04 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.44 Mil.
Net Income was -0.436 + -0.268 + -0.261 + -0.638 = $-1.60 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.339 + 0.191 + 0.446 + 0.273 + 0.178) / 5 = $0.2854 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $0.34 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2.46 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.18 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $2.85 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sundance Strategies's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.82. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sundance Strategies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.39. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-1.815/0.178
=-10.19662921

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-1.603/0.339
=-4.72861357

Sundance Strategies's return on assets of this year was -10.19662921. Sundance Strategies's return on assets of last year was -4.72861357. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Sundance Strategies's current Net Income (TTM) was -1.82. Sundance Strategies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.39. ==> -0.39 > -1.82 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=3.599/0.0704
=51.12215909

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=2.464/0.2854
=8.63349685

Sundance Strategies's gearing of this year was 51.12215909. Sundance Strategies's gearing of last year was 8.63349685. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.041/1.439
=0.02849201

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.178/2.853
=0.06239047

Sundance Strategies's current ratio of this year was 0.02849201. Sundance Strategies's current ratio of last year was 0.06239047. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Sundance Strategies's number of shares in issue this year was 42.265. Sundance Strategies's number of shares in issue last year was 43.346. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Sundance Strategies's gross margin of this year was . Sundance Strategies's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/0.178
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/0.339
=0

Sundance Strategies's asset turnover of this year was 0. Sundance Strategies's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+1+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sundance Strategies has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
Sundance Strategies (SUND) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Aug. 09, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Sundance Strategies and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Sundance Strategies' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Sundance Strategies ranks #471 out of 489 companies in the Insurance industry, placing it in the top 96.3%.
Is Sundance Strategies' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Sundance Strategies' current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 5.00. The Insurance industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Sundance Strategies' value of 2 is 66.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Sundance Strategies ranks #471 out of 489 companies in the Insurance industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Sundance Strategies has a GF Score™ of 26/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Sundance Strategies' Piotroski F-Score compare to ZBAO and GOCOQ?
According to the Insurance industry distribution chart, Sundance Strategies ranks #471 out of 489 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Sundance Strategies in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Sundance Strategies' value of 2 is 66.7% below this benchmark. Historically, Sundance Strategies' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, Sundance Strategies has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Insurance company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Insurance companies is 6.00, based on 489 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Sundance Strategies's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 66.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Sundance Strategies and its competitors. For the Insurance industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Sundance Strategies's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Sundance Strategies stock overvalued right now?
Sundance Strategies (SUND) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 66.7% below the Insurance industry median of 6.00. Sundance Strategies' overall GF Score™ is 26/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Sundance Strategies (SUND), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Aug. 09, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Sundance Strategies Business Description

Address 4626 North 300 West, Suite No. 365, Provo, UT, USA, 84604
Sundance Strategies Inc is a specialty financial services company. The company is engaged in the business of purchasing or acquiring life insurance policies and residual interests in or financial products tied to life insurance policies and residual interests involving life insurance policies and financial products. It focuses on the purchase and sales of net insurance benefit contracts (NIB) based on life insurance policies.
26GF Score

Get the complete analysis for SUND

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.20
Price