Caswell (TPE:6416) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 20% Below Median


TPE:6416 Caswell Inc TPE:6416
74 GF Score
Price NT$78.90
GF Value NT$97.32
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Caswell Piotroski F-Score?

Caswell TPE:6416 -2.83% 74 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates TPE:6416 with a GF Score™ of 74/100 and a GF Value™ of NT$97.32 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,426 Hardware companies, Caswell ranks worse than 62.2% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Caswell has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Caswell's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TPE:6416' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Caswell was 6. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.

Caswell  (TPE:6416) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Caswell Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Caswell Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Caswell's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Caswell Piotroski F-Score Chart

Caswell Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00

Caswell Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 4.00

TPE:6416 vs CSCO, CIEN, MSI: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Communication Equipment subindustry, Caswell's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Caswell Piotroski F-Score vs Hardware Industry

For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, Caswell's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Caswell's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TPE:6416
74GF Score
Caswell Inc TPE:6416
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 80.696 + 54.995 + 77.753 + 102.146 = NT$316 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 350.725 + -135.965 + 36.128 + 25.2 = NT$276 Mil.
Revenue was 1108.897 + 1061.55 + 966.269 + 1172.556 = NT$4,309 Mil.
Gross Profit was 273.276 + 240.971 + 219.526 + 260.307 = NT$994 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was
(5666.099 + 5682.571 + 5472.528 + 5427.586 + 5930.762) / 5 = NT$5635.9092 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was NT$5,666 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$687 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NT$4,011 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NT$1,482 Mil.
Net Income was 66.335 + 95.133 + 87.918 + 80.696 = NT$330 Mil.

Revenue was 839.358 + 1124.518 + 1119.929 + 1169.864 = NT$4,254 Mil.
Gross Profit was 208.206 + 259.274 + 274.147 + 272.099 = NT$1,014 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(5426.531 + 5678.295 + 5921.044 + 5654.136 + 5666.099) / 5 = NT$5669.221 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was NT$5,427 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$769 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NT$3,677 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NT$1,172 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Caswell's current Net Income (TTM) was 316. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Caswell's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 276. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=315.59/5666.099
=0.05569793

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=330.082/5426.531
=0.06082744

Caswell's return on assets of this year was 0.05569793. Caswell's return on assets of last year was 0.06082744. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Caswell's current Net Income (TTM) was 316. Caswell's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 276. ==> 276 <= 316 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=686.956/5635.9092
=0.12188912

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=769.234/5669.221
=0.13568601

Caswell's gearing of this year was 0.12188912. Caswell's gearing of last year was 0.13568601. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4011.358/1482.189
=2.70637415

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3676.894/1171.751
=3.13794825

Caswell's current ratio of this year was 2.70637415. Caswell's current ratio of last year was 3.13794825. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Caswell's number of shares in issue this year was 73.56. Caswell's number of shares in issue last year was 73.694. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=994.08/4309.272
=0.23068398

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1013.726/4253.669
=0.23831803

Caswell's gross margin of this year was 0.23068398. Caswell's gross margin of last year was 0.23831803. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=4309.272/5666.099
=0.76053595

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=4253.669/5426.531
=0.78386524

Caswell's asset turnover of this year was 0.76053595. Caswell's asset turnover of last year was 0.78386524. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+0+1+0+1+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Caswell has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Caswell (TPE:6416) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Caswell and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Caswell's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Caswell ranks #1509 out of 2426 companies in the Hardware industry, placing it in the top 62.2%.
Is Caswell's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Caswell's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 6.00. The Hardware industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Caswell's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Caswell ranks #1509 out of 2426 companies in the Hardware industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Caswell has a GF Score™ of 74/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Caswell's Piotroski F-Score compare to CSCO and CIEN?
According to the Hardware industry distribution chart, Caswell ranks #1509 out of 2426 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Caswell in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Caswell's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Caswell's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Caswell has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Hardware company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Hardware companies is 5.00, based on 2,426 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Caswell's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Caswell and its competitors. For the Hardware industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Caswell's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Caswell stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Caswell (TPE:6416) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is NT$97.32, compared to a current price of NT$78.90 — trading 18.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Hardware industry median of 5.00. Caswell's overall GF Score™ is 74/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Caswell (TPE:6416), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Caswell (TPE:6416) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Caswell stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of NT$78.90 is trading 18.9% below its estimated GF Value™ of NT$97.32. GuruFocus considers Caswell to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for TPE:6416:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: NT$97.32 vs. price of NT$78.90 (18.9% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 74/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Hardware median (#1509 of 2426)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TPE:6416 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Caswell Business Description

Address Jianguo 1st Road, 12th Floor, No. 308, Xinzhuang District, New Taipei City, TWN, 242047
Caswell Inc is engaged in electronic components manufacturing, computer and peripheral manufacturing, Equipment Manufacturing, and the wholesale of Electronic Materials and Information Services. Its product categories include Network Security & Management, Edge / Fog Computing, Industrial Control & Automation, Cloud & Data Center Switches, Network Storage, and Network Adapters & Modules. The group has three segments, namely the domestic segment and the PRC segment, which mainly engage in manufacturing and selling various network appliances and peripherals. Its other segment mainly specializes in selling various network appliances and peripherals. It derives revenue from the Taiwan segment.
74GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TPE:6416

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

NT$78.90
Price
NT$97.32
GF Value