Groundhog (TPE:6906) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jul. 12, 2026) — 43% Below Median


TPE:6906 Groundhog Inc TPE:6906
63 GF Score
Price NT$82.00
GF Value NT$144.68
Valuation Significantly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Groundhog Piotroski F-Score?

Groundhog TPE:6906 63 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 12, 2026, which is 43% below its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates TPE:6906 with a GF Score™ of 63/100 and a GF Value™ of NT$144.68 (Significantly Undervalued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,740 Software companies, Groundhog ranks worse than 60.33% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Groundhog has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TPE:6906' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 7   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Groundhog was 7. The lowest was 4. And the median was 7.

Groundhog  (TPE:6906) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Groundhog Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Groundhog Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Groundhog Piotroski F-Score Chart

Groundhog Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A N/A 7.00 7.00 4.00

Groundhog Quarterly Data
Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00

TPE:6906 vs IBM, ACN, FISV: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Groundhog Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TPE:6906
63GF Score
Groundhog Inc TPE:6906
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 16.678 + -8.496 + 10.266 + 42.789 = NT$61.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -16.537 + 34.74 + 19.273 + 22.983 = NT$60.5 Mil.
Revenue was 79.262 + 69.036 + 80.97 + 118.91 = NT$348.2 Mil.
Gross Profit was 68.39 + 58.996 + 69.052 + 105.792 = NT$302.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was
(1142.48 + 1148.324 + 963.756 + 833.969 + 898.56) / 5 = NT$997.4178 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was NT$1,142.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$3.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NT$875.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NT$158.9 Mil.
Net Income was 18.643 + 6.629 + 31.251 + 62.63 = NT$119.2 Mil.

Revenue was 77.191 + 67.063 + 103.597 + 145.927 = NT$393.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 58.536 + 47.606 + 92.133 + 134.018 = NT$332.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(676.163 + 1119.318 + 1113.377 + 1027.036 + 1142.48) / 5 = NT$1015.6748 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was NT$676.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was NT$1,126.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was NT$177.9 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Groundhog's current Net Income (TTM) was 61.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Groundhog's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 60.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=61.237/1142.48
=0.05360006

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=119.153/676.163
=0.17621934

Groundhog's return on assets of this year was 0.05360006. Groundhog's return on assets of last year was 0.17621934. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Groundhog's current Net Income (TTM) was 61.2. Groundhog's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 60.5. ==> 60.5 <= 61.2 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=3.741/997.4178
=0.00375069

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0/1015.6748
=0

Groundhog's gearing of this year was 0.00375069. Groundhog's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=875.465/158.852
=5.5111991

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1126.176/177.919
=6.32971184

Groundhog's current ratio of this year was 5.5111991. Groundhog's current ratio of last year was 6.32971184. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Groundhog's number of shares in issue this year was 32.552. Groundhog's number of shares in issue last year was 33.862. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=302.23/348.178
=0.86803302

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=332.293/393.778
=0.84385872

Groundhog's gross margin of this year was 0.86803302. Groundhog's gross margin of last year was 0.84385872. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=348.178/1142.48
=0.30475632

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=393.778/676.163
=0.58237141

Groundhog's asset turnover of this year was 0.30475632. Groundhog's asset turnover of last year was 0.58237141. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+0+0+0+1+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Groundhog has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Groundhog (TPE:6906) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jul. 12, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Groundhog and its competitors. This is 43% below median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Groundhog ranks #1653 out of 2740 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 60.3%.
Is Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Groundhog's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 43% below median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 7.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Groundhog's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Groundhog ranks #1653 out of 2740 companies in the Software industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Groundhog has a GF Score™ of 63/100 and is considered Significantly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Groundhog's Piotroski F-Score compare to IBM and ACN?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Groundhog ranks #1653 out of 2740 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Groundhog in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Groundhog's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Groundhog's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Groundhog has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,740 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Groundhog's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Groundhog and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Groundhog's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 43% below median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Groundhog stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Groundhog (TPE:6906) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is NT$144.68, compared to a current price of NT$82.00 — trading 43.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 43% below median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 20% below the Software industry median of 5.00. Groundhog's overall GF Score™ is 63/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Groundhog (TPE:6906), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 12, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Groundhog (TPE:6906) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Groundhog stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of NT$82.00 is trading 43.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of NT$144.68. GuruFocus considers Groundhog to be Significantly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for TPE:6906:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (43% below median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: NT$144.68 vs. price of NT$82.00 (43.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 63/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Software median (#1653 of 2740)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TPE:6906 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Groundhog Business Description

Address No. 42, Section 2, Zhongshan North Road, 2nd Floor, Zhongshan District, Taipei City, TWN
Groundhog Inc is involved in developing, designing, implementing, and installing information software services on the intelligence platform. Its primary product line includes software technical services. The company geographically, operates in Arab, India, Africa, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Others generating key revenue from Indian markets.
63GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TPE:6906

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

NT$82.00
Price
NT$144.68
GF Value