Aegis Brands (TSX:AEG) Piotroski F-Score: N/A (As of Aug. 07, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

TSX:AEG Aegis Brands Inc TSX:AEG
31 GF Score
Price C$0.26
GF Value C$0.34
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Aegis Brands Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Aegis Brands has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Aegis Brands's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Aegis Brands was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Aegis Brands  (TSX:AEG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Aegis Brands Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Aegis Brands Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Aegis Brands's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Aegis Brands Piotroski F-Score Chart

Aegis Brands Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 2.00 5.00 4.00 7.00

Aegis Brands Quarterly Data
Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A 8.00 7.00 8.00 N/A

TSX:AEG vs MCD, SBUX, YUM: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Restaurants subindustry, Aegis Brands's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Aegis Brands Piotroski F-Score vs Restaurants Industry

For the Restaurants industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Aegis Brands's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Aegis Brands's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSX:AEG
31GF Score
Aegis Brands Inc TSX:AEG
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun26) TTM:Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 0.684 + 1.068 + 0.476 + 1.322 = C$3.55 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.288 + 1.238 + 1.026 + 1.213 = C$3.77 Mil.
Revenue was 3.803 + 4.811 + 3.756 + 4.543 = C$16.91 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.6 + 3.565 + 2.544 + 3.463 = C$12.17 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(54.591 + 53.318 + 55.593 + 55.633 + 55.45) / 5 = C$54.917 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was C$54.59 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$22.10 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$6.39 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$8.38 Mil.
Net Income was -1.688 + -0.241 + 0.134 + 1.109 = C$-0.69 Mil.

Revenue was 4.21 + 3.823 + 4.16 + 4.529 = C$16.72 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.605 + 2.338 + 2.798 + 3.299 = C$11.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(0 + 55.824 + 56.341 + 56.754 + 54.591) / 5 = C$55.8775 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was C$0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$24.61 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$5.26 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$8.61 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Aegis Brands's current Net Income (TTM) was 3.55. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Aegis Brands's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 3.77. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun25)
=3.55/54.591
=0.06502903

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=-0.686/0
=

Aegis Brands's return on assets of this year was 0.06502903. Aegis Brands's return on assets of last year was . ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Aegis Brands's current Net Income (TTM) was 3.55. Aegis Brands's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 3.77. ==> 3.77 > 3.55 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun25 to Jun26
=22.104/54.917
=0.40249832

Gearing (Last Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=24.605/55.8775
=0.44033824

Aegis Brands's gearing of this year was 0.40249832. Aegis Brands's gearing of last year was 0.44033824. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=6.392/8.375
=0.76322388

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5.256/8.611
=0.61038207

Aegis Brands's current ratio of this year was 0.76322388. Aegis Brands's current ratio of last year was 0.61038207. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Aegis Brands's number of shares in issue this year was 85.492. Aegis Brands's number of shares in issue last year was 85.757. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=12.172/16.913
=0.71968308

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=11.04/16.722
=0.66020811

Aegis Brands's gross margin of this year was 0.71968308. Aegis Brands's gross margin of last year was 0.66020811. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun25)
=16.913/54.591
=0.30981297

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun24)
=16.722/0
=

Aegis Brands's asset turnover of this year was 0.30981297. Aegis Brands's asset turnover of last year was . ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
=9

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Aegis Brands has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Is Aegis Brands (TSX:AEG) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Aegis Brands stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of C$0.26 is trading 25% below its estimated GF Value™ of C$0.34. GuruFocus considers Aegis Brands to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for TSX:AEG:

  • Piotroski F-Score: N/A
  • GF Value™: C$0.34 vs. price of C$0.26 (25% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 31/100 with 5 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSX:AEG stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Aegis Brands Business Description

Other Exchanges 6I9:Germany
Address 703 Evans Avenue, Suite 501, Etobicoke, Toronto, ON, CAN, M9C 5E9
Aegis Brands Inc is a consolidator of brands in the food and beverage space. The company operates in business segments: Aegis (Corporate): It amounts are public company expenses and amounts relating to shared groups who provide services, such as back-office functions, to support its operating brands; and St. Louis, The company owns the partnership interest of the St. Louis brands and its products, such as sauces and frozen food products, are also sold in grocery stores across Canada. The The company's consolidated operating revenues from continuing operations are comprised of the sales of goods from company operated restaurants, the sale of goods through retail and other ancillary channels, royalties from the St. Louis franchisees, supplier contributions, and other service fees.
31GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSX:AEG

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

C$0.26
Price
C$0.34
GF Value