The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Pond Technologies Holdings Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Pond Technologies Holdings Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
TSXV:POND vs ADM, TSN, BG: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Farm Products subindustry, Pond Technologies Holdings's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Pond Technologies Holdings Piotroski F-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry
For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Pond Technologies Holdings's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Pond Technologies Holdings's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Pond Technologies Holdings's current Net Income (TTM) was -2.79.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Pond Technologies Holdings's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.84.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 3. Change in Return on Assets
Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.
Pond Technologies Holdings's return on assets of this year was -2.36618522. Pond Technologies Holdings's return on assets of last year was -1.1090573.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Pond Technologies Holdings's gearing of this year was 0. Pond Technologies Holdings's gearing of last year was 0.36342894.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Pond Technologies Holdings's current ratio of this year was 0.04567424. Pond Technologies Holdings's current ratio of last year was 0.06686605.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Pond Technologies Holdings's number of shares in issue this year was 85.592. Pond Technologies Holdings's number of shares in issue last year was 78.426.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Pond Technologies Holdings's gross margin of this year was 3.13834951. Pond Technologies Holdings's gross margin of last year was -1.11680328.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Pond Technologies Holdings's asset turnover of this year was -0.35004248. Pond Technologies Holdings's asset turnover of last year was -0.15033888.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
0
=
3
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Pond Technologies Holdings has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Pond Technologies Holdings (TSXV:POND) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jul. 02, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pond Technologies Holdings and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Pond Technologies Holdings' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00.
Is Pond Technologies Holdings' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Pond Technologies Holdings' current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 5.00. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Pond Technologies Holdings' value of 3 is 40% below this industry median.
How does Pond Technologies Holdings' Piotroski F-Score compare to ADM and TSN?
Pond Technologies Holdings' Piotroski F-Score of 3 can be compared against companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Pond Technologies Holdings' value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Pond Technologies Holdings' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Pond Technologies Holdings has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 5.00, based on 1,909 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Pond Technologies Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pond Technologies Holdings and its competitors. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Pond Technologies Holdings's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Pond Technologies Holdings stock overvalued right now?
Pond Technologies Holdings (TSXV:POND) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The stock's GF Value™ is C$0.01, compared to a current price of C$0.01 — trading right at its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 40% below the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Pond Technologies Holdings (TSXV:POND), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 02, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Pond Technologies Holdings Inc is a Canada Based company. The Company's primary business is to pursue microalgal biomass cultivation using available sources of carbon dioxide (CO2), including CO2 rich emission sources from industrial plants and the licensing of its technology. The resultant algae can be used in the production of nutraceuticals, commonly known as superfoods, growth of algae strains for the expression of complex proteins used in diagnostics and therapeutic treatments, aquaculture, and animal feeds. The Company has formed a nutraceutical business segment and is actively pursuing opportunities in the nutraceutical and superfood marketplace.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
TSXV:POND has been successfully added to your 