Carbon Studio (WAR:CRB) Piotroski F-Score: 2 (As of Jul. 03, 2026) — 33% Below Median


WAR:CRB Carbon Studio SA WAR:CRB
62 GF Score
Price zł2.00
GF Value zł2.75
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Carbon Studio Piotroski F-Score?

Carbon Studio WAR:CRB 62 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jul. 03, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:CRB with a GF Score™ of 62/100 and a GF Value™ of zł2.75 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 549 Interactive Media companies, Carbon Studio ranks worse than 92.53% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Carbon Studio has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:CRB' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 7
Current: 2

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Carbon Studio was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Carbon Studio  (WAR:CRB) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Carbon Studio Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Carbon Studio Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Carbon Studio Piotroski F-Score Chart

Carbon Studio Annual Data
Trend Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 4.00 7.00 6.00 3.00 3.00

Carbon Studio Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00

WAR:CRB vs NTES, EA, TTWO: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia subindustry, Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Carbon Studio Piotroski F-Score vs Interactive Media Industry

For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:CRB
62GF Score
Carbon Studio SA WAR:CRB
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -1.012 + -0.471 + -1.143 + -0.588 = zł-3.21 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.907 + -0.537 + -0.36 + -0.214 = zł-0.20 Mil.
Revenue was 0.432 + 0.702 + 0.083 + 0.543 = zł1.76 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.418 + 0.691 + 0.073 + 0.53 = zł1.71 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(12.297 + 11.944 + 11.306 + 10.171 + 10.121) / 5 = zł11.1678 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was zł12.30 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł1.06 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł6.33 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł4.59 Mil.
Net Income was -0.737 + -0.589 + -0.347 + -0.771 = zł-2.44 Mil.

Revenue was 0.634 + 1.07 + 1.268 + 0.68 = zł3.65 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.614 + 1.055 + 1.238 + 0.663 = zł3.57 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(16.229 + 15.134 + 14.398 + 13.075 + 12.297) / 5 = zł14.2266 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was zł16.23 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł1.65 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł4.82 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł2.99 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Carbon Studio's current Net Income (TTM) was -3.21. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Carbon Studio's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-3.214/12.297
=-0.26136456

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-2.444/16.229
=-0.15059461

Carbon Studio's return on assets of this year was -0.26136456. Carbon Studio's return on assets of last year was -0.15059461. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Carbon Studio's current Net Income (TTM) was -3.21. Carbon Studio's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.20. ==> -0.20 > -3.21 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1.061/11.1678
=0.09500528

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1.647/14.2266
=0.11576905

Carbon Studio's gearing of this year was 0.09500528. Carbon Studio's gearing of last year was 0.11576905. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=6.332/4.59
=1.3795207

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4.818/2.99
=1.61137124

Carbon Studio's current ratio of this year was 1.3795207. Carbon Studio's current ratio of last year was 1.61137124. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Carbon Studio's number of shares in issue this year was 2.114. Carbon Studio's number of shares in issue last year was 1.949. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1.712/1.76
=0.97272727

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3.57/3.652
=0.97754655

Carbon Studio's gross margin of this year was 0.97272727. Carbon Studio's gross margin of last year was 0.97754655. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1.76/12.297
=0.14312434

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=3.652/16.229
=0.22502927

Carbon Studio's asset turnover of this year was 0.14312434. Carbon Studio's asset turnover of last year was 0.22502927. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=2

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Carbon Studio has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 2 mean?
Carbon Studio (WAR:CRB) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jul. 03, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Carbon Studio and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Carbon Studio ranks #508 out of 549 companies in the Interactive Media industry, placing it in the top 92.5%.
Is Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Carbon Studio's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Interactive Media industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Carbon Studio's value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Carbon Studio ranks #508 out of 549 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Carbon Studio has a GF Score™ of 62/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Carbon Studio's Piotroski F-Score compare to NTES and EA?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Carbon Studio ranks #508 out of 549 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Carbon Studio in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Carbon Studio's value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, Carbon Studio's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Carbon Studio has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Interactive Media company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Interactive Media companies is 5.00, based on 549 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Carbon Studio's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Carbon Studio and its competitors. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Carbon Studio's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Carbon Studio stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Carbon Studio (WAR:CRB) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł2.75, compared to a current price of zł2.00 — trading 27.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 60% below the Interactive Media industry median of 5.00. Carbon Studio's overall GF Score™ is 62/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Carbon Studio (WAR:CRB), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jul. 03, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Carbon Studio (WAR:CRB) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Carbon Studio stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of zł2.00 is trading 27.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of zł2.75. GuruFocus considers Carbon Studio to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:CRB:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 2 (33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00)
  • GF Value™: zł2.75 vs. price of zł2.00 (27.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 62/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 60% below the Interactive Media median (#508 of 549)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:CRB stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Carbon Studio Business Description

Address Kosciuszki 63 Street, Chorzow, POL, 41-503
Carbon Studio SA is engaged in game development and applications dedicated for VR technology. The company's developed games include The Wizards - Dark Times, The Wizards - Quest Edition, The Wizards - Trails of Meliora, The Wizards - Enhanced Edition, Akice VR and Dreamo.
62GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:CRB

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł2.00
Price
zł2.75
GF Value