Rank Progress (WAR:RNK) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 17% Below Median


WAR:RNK Rank Progress SA WAR:RNK
75 GF Score
Price zł4.58
GF Value zł3.03
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score?

Rank Progress WAR:RNK 75 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 17% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:RNK with a GF Score™ of 75/100 and a GF Value™ of zł3.03 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,756 Real Estate companies, Rank Progress ranks better than 61.1% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rank Progress has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Rank Progress's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:RNK' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Rank Progress was 8. The lowest was 1. And the median was 6.

Rank Progress  (WAR:RNK) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Rank Progress's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score Chart

Rank Progress Annual Data
Trend Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 7.00

Rank Progress Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 1.00 5.00 6.00 5.00

Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Real Estate - Diversified subindustry, Rank Progress's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Rank Progress Piotroski F-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, Rank Progress's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Rank Progress's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:RNK
75GF Score
Rank Progress SA WAR:RNK
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was -7.033 + 1.68 + 16.223 + 3.824 = zł14.69 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.87 + 2.227 + 4.444 + 3.305 = zł10.85 Mil.
Revenue was 15.683 + 16.37 + 16.632 + 15.975 = zł64.66 Mil.
Gross Profit was 11.807 + 16.377 + 12.815 + 11.773 = zł52.77 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(853.207 + 847.207 + 855.916 + 873.211 + 903.462) / 5 = zł866.6006 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was zł853.21 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł199.51 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł193.75 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł101.84 Mil.
Net Income was 54.95 + -3.959 + -5 + -5.441 = zł40.55 Mil.

Revenue was 111.224 + 12.036 + 16.088 + 20.724 = zł160.07 Mil.
Gross Profit was 90.826 + 1.869 + 12.218 + 15.129 = zł120.04 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(890.848 + 970.233 + 879.432 + 878.52 + 853.207) / 5 = zł894.448 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was zł890.85 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.54 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł198.12 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł273.96 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rank Progress's current Net Income (TTM) was 14.69. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Rank Progress's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 10.85. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=14.694/853.207
=0.01722208

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=40.55/890.848
=0.04551843

Rank Progress's return on assets of this year was 0.01722208. Rank Progress's return on assets of last year was 0.04551843. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Rank Progress's current Net Income (TTM) was 14.69. Rank Progress's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 10.85. ==> 10.85 <= 14.69 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Mar26
=199.512/866.6006
=0.2302237

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0.535/894.448
=0.00059813

Rank Progress's gearing of this year was 0.2302237. Rank Progress's gearing of last year was 0.00059813. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=193.746/101.835
=1.90254824

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=198.115/273.956
=0.72316357

Rank Progress's current ratio of this year was 1.90254824. Rank Progress's current ratio of last year was 0.72316357. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Rank Progress's number of shares in issue this year was 37.183. Rank Progress's number of shares in issue last year was 37.185. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=52.772/64.66
=0.81614599

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=120.042/160.072
=0.74992503

Rank Progress's gross margin of this year was 0.81614599. Rank Progress's gross margin of last year was 0.74992503. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=64.66/853.207
=0.07578466

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=160.072/890.848
=0.17968497

Rank Progress's asset turnover of this year was 0.07578466. Rank Progress's asset turnover of last year was 0.17968497. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+0+0+1+1+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Rank Progress has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Rank Progress (WAR:RNK) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Rank Progress and its competitors. This is 17% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Rank Progress' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Rank Progress ranks #683 out of 1756 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 38.9%.
Is Rank Progress' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Rank Progress' current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 8.00. The Real Estate industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Rank Progress' value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Rank Progress ranks #683 out of 1756 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Rank Progress has a GF Score™ of 75/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Rank Progress' Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, Rank Progress ranks #683 out of 1756 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Rank Progress in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Rank Progress' value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Rank Progress' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Rank Progress has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Real Estate company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Real Estate companies is 5.00, based on 1,756 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Rank Progress's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Rank Progress and its competitors. For the Real Estate industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Rank Progress's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 17% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Rank Progress stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Rank Progress (WAR:RNK) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł3.03, compared to a current price of zł4.58 — trading 51% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is 17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 0% at the Real Estate industry median of 5.00. Rank Progress' overall GF Score™ is 75/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Rank Progress (WAR:RNK), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Rank Progress (WAR:RNK) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Rank Progress stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of zł4.58 is trading 51% above its estimated GF Value™ of zł3.03. GuruFocus considers Rank Progress to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:RNK:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (17% below median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: zł3.03 vs. price of zł4.58 (51% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 75/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Real Estate median (#683 of 1756)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:RNK stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Rank Progress Business Description

Address 63 Zlotoryjska, Legnica, POL, 59-220
Rank Progress SA is a Poland-based company engaged in property investment and development. It is engaged in renting and operating of own or leased real property, buying and selling of own real property and constructing its own projects. The company's business model is based on the purchase of real estate, land integration, administrative preparation for development, construction works, and management or sale of a property. The company is also engaged in providing rental space to shopping centers in the main cities across Poland.
75GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:RNK

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł4.58
Price
zł3.03
GF Value