IWGFF (International Workplace Group) Beneish M-Score: -3.00 (As of Jun. 25, 2026)


IWGFF International Workplace Group PLC IWGFF
68 GF Score
Price $2.43
GF Value $2.46
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is International Workplace Group Beneish M-Score?

International Workplace Group IWGFF -1.69% 68 Beneish M-Score is -3.00 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus rates IWGFF with a GF Score™ of 68/100 and a GF Value™ of $2.46 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,682 Real Estate companies, International Workplace Group ranks better than 84.48% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -3 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

IWGFF' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.69   Med: -2.86   Max: 10.17
Current: -3

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of International Workplace Group was 10.17. The lowest was -3.69. And the median was -2.86.


International Workplace Group Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

International Workplace Group Beneish M-Score Chart

International Workplace Group Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.69 -2.09 -3.17 -2.60 -3.00

International Workplace Group Semi-Annual Data
Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.17 0.00 -2.60 0.00 -3.00

IWGFF vs CBRE, BEKE: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Real Estate Services subindustry, International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


International Workplace Group Beneish M-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score falls into.


IWGFF
68GF Score
International Workplace Group PLC IWGFF
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

International Workplace Group Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of International Workplace Group for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.7119+0.528 * 0.921+0.404 * 1.049+0.892 * 1.0016+0.115 * 0.9551
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.0606+4.679 * -0.03714-0.327 * 0.9998
=-2.95

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Total Receivables was $507 Mil.
Revenue was $3,762 Mil.
Gross Profit was $1,031 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,276 Mil.
Total Assets was $9,316 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $6,071 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $357 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $546 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3,344 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $6,091 Mil.
Net Income was $18 Mil.
Gross Profit was $0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $364 Mil.
Total Receivables was $711 Mil.
Revenue was $3,756 Mil.
Gross Profit was $948 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,331 Mil.
Total Assets was $9,112 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $5,945 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $333 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $514 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $3,608 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $5,622 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(507 / 3762) / (711 / 3756)
=0.134769 / 0.189297
=0.7119

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(948 / 3756) / (1031 / 3762)
=0.252396 / 0.274056
=0.921

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (1276 + 6071) / 9316) / (1 - (1331 + 5945) / 9112)
=0.211357 / 0.201493
=1.049

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=3762 / 3756
=1.0016

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(333 / (333 + 5945)) / (357 / (357 + 6071))
=0.053042 / 0.055538
=0.9551

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(546 / 3762) / (514 / 3756)
=0.145136 / 0.136848
=1.0606

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((6091 + 3344) / 9316) / ((5622 + 3608) / 9112)
=1.012774 / 1.01295
=0.9998

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(18 - 0 - 364) / 9316
=-0.03714

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

International Workplace Group has a M-score of -2.95 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -3.00 mean?
International Workplace Group (IWGFF) has a Beneish M-Score of -3.00 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on International Workplace Group and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, International Workplace Group ranks #261 out of 1682 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 15.5%.
Is International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score too high?
International Workplace Group's current Beneish M-Score is -3.00. Based on the distribution chart, International Workplace Group ranks #261 out of 1682 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, International Workplace Group has a GF Score™ of 68/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does International Workplace Group's Beneish M-Score compare to CBRE and BEKE?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, International Workplace Group ranks #261 out of 1682 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places International Workplace Group in the top 16% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Real Estate company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Real Estate industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on International Workplace Group and its competitors. International Workplace Group's current Beneish M-Score is -3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is International Workplace Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, International Workplace Group (IWGFF) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $2.46, compared to a current price of $2.43 — trading 1.2% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -3.00. International Workplace Group's overall GF Score™ is 68/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For International Workplace Group (IWGFF), the current Beneish M-Score is -3.00 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is International Workplace Group (IWGFF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, International Workplace Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $2.43 is trading 1.2% below its estimated GF Value™ of $2.46. GuruFocus considers International Workplace Group to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for IWGFF:

  • Beneish M-Score: -3.00
  • GF Value™: $2.46 vs. price of $2.43 (1.2% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 68/100 with 5 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the IWGFF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


International Workplace Group Business Description

Other Exchanges IWGl:UKIWG:UKIWG:Germany
Address Baarerstrasse 52, Zug, CHE, CH-6300
International Workplace Group PLC owns a network of business centers leased to various business customers and offers flexible workspace options. It owns and operates brands like Regus, Spaces, Signature, HQ, and No 18. The company operates in three principal geographical segments: the Americas; Europe, the Middle East, Africa; and Asia-Pacific. The Americas segment generates the majority proportion of revenue.
68GF Score

Get the complete analysis for IWGFF

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$2.43
Price
$2.46
GF Value