GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Cyclical » Restaurants » Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Ltd (SHSE:600721) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co (SHSE:600721) Beneish M-Score : -2.81 (As of Jun. 20, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1996. Start your Free Trial

What is Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.81 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SHSE:600721' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.6   Med: -3.18   Max: -0.45
Current: -2.81

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co was -0.45. The lowest was -25.60. And the median was -3.18.


Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Beneish M-Score Chart

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.37 -4.38 -3.40 -2.88 -2.73

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.85 -2.90 -2.85 -2.73 -2.81

Competitive Comparison of Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score

For the Restaurants subindustry, Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Restaurants Industry

For the Restaurants industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.9964+0.528 * 0.8188+0.404 * 0.9529+0.892 * 1.0481+0.115 * 1
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.8791+4.679 * -0.056518-0.327 * 1.0194
=-2.81

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Total Receivables was ¥227.3 Mil.
Revenue was 90.876 + 103.564 + 98.5 + 91.503 = ¥384.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 47.488 + 52.97 + 49.901 + 41.154 = ¥191.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥584.4 Mil.
Total Assets was ¥1,089.7 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ¥144.0 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ¥0.0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ¥61.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥313.7 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥1.4 Mil.
Net Income was 20.663 + -4.719 + 4.692 + 6.313 = ¥26.9 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = ¥0.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 15.106 + 48.051 + 7.883 + 17.495 = ¥88.5 Mil.
Total Receivables was ¥217.6 Mil.
Revenue was 75.71 + 93.527 + 92.595 + 104.966 = ¥366.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 37.059 + 33.206 + 38.4 + 40.942 = ¥149.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥509.8 Mil.
Total Assets was ¥1,005.6 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was ¥145.9 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was ¥0.0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was ¥66.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥284.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥1.3 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(227.271 / 384.443) / (217.629 / 366.798)
=0.59117 / 0.593321
=0.9964

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(149.607 / 366.798) / (191.513 / 384.443)
=0.407873 / 0.498157
=0.8188

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (584.415 + 143.952) / 1089.671) / (1 - (509.822 + 145.875) / 1005.622)
=0.331572 / 0.347969
=0.9529

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=384.443 / 366.798
=1.0481

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0 / (0 + 145.875)) / (0 / (0 + 143.952))
=0 / 0
=1

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(61.513 / 384.443) / (66.76 / 366.798)
=0.160006 / 0.182008
=0.8791

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((1.399 + 313.727) / 1089.671) / ((1.308 + 283.99) / 1005.622)
=0.289194 / 0.283703
=1.0194

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(26.949 - 0 - 88.535) / 1089.671
=-0.056518

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co has a M-score of -2.81 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.


Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co (SHSE:600721) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
No. 141 Zhongshan Road, Urumqi, Xinjiang, CHN, 830002
Xinjiang Baihuacun Co Ltd is engaged in energy development, information products and digital imaging technology, as well as the operation of restaurants.
Executives
Xia Yan Director
Cai Zi Yun Directors, senior managers
Lv Zheng Tian Director
Zheng Cai Hong Director
Zhao Qin Qin senior management
Li Na Supervisors
Wang Qing Hui Director
Huang Hui Director
Tian Ping Director
Zhang Xiao Qing Director
Zhang Jun senior management
Hou Tie Jun Director

Xinjiang Baihuacun Pharam Tech Co (SHSE:600721) Headlines

No Headlines