Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Vivid SeatsSEAT -0.57%58 Receivables Turnover is 3.75 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus rates SEAT with a GF Score™ of 58/100 and a GF Value™ of $4.10 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 541 Interactive Media companies, Vivid Seats ranks better than 76.16% on this metric.
The Receivables Turnover ratio measures the number of times a company collects its average accounts receivable balance. It is calculated as Revenue divided by average Accounts Receivable. An efficient company has a higher accounts receivable turnover ratio while an inefficient company has a lower ratio. Vivid Seats's Revenue for the
three
months ended in Mar. 2026 was $125.8 Mil. Vivid Seats's average Accounts Receivable for the
three
months ended in Mar. 2026 was $33.5 Mil.
Hence, Vivid Seats's Receivables Turnover for the
three
months ended in Mar. 2026 was 3.75.
An efficient company has a higher accounts receivable turnover ratio while an inefficient company has a lower ratio. This metric is commonly used to compare companies within the same industry to check whether they are on par with their competitors.
Vivid Seats Receivables Turnover Related Terms
Vivid Seats Receivables Turnover Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Vivid Seats's Receivables Turnover can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
SEAT vs MSEZ, BODI, IZEA: Receivables Turnover Comparison
For the Internet Content & Information subindustry, Vivid Seats's Receivables Turnover, along with its competitors' market caps and Receivables Turnover data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Vivid Seats Receivables Turnover vs Interactive Media Industry
For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Vivid Seats's Receivables Turnover distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Vivid Seats's Receivables Turnover falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Vivid Seats (SEAT) has a Receivables Turnover of 3.75 as of Mar. 2026. The accounts receivables turnover ratio measures the number of times a company collects its average accounts receivable balance. It is calculated as Revenue divided by Average Accounts Receivable. View historical data on Vivid Seats and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Vivid Seats ranks #129 out of 541 companies in the Interactive Media industry, placing it in the top 23.8%.
Is Vivid Seats' Receivables Turnover too high?
Vivid Seats' current Receivables Turnover is 3.75. The Interactive Media industry median Receivables Turnover is 7.87. Vivid Seats' value of 3.75 is 52.4% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Vivid Seats ranks #129 out of 541 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Vivid Seats has a GF Score™ of 58/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Vivid Seats' Receivables Turnover compare to MSEZ and BODI?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Vivid Seats ranks #129 out of 541 companies for Receivables Turnover. This places Vivid Seats in the top 24% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Receivables Turnover is 7.87. Vivid Seats' value of 3.75 is 52.4% below this benchmark. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Receivables Turnover for an Interactive Media company?
The median Receivables Turnover among Interactive Media companies is 7.87, based on 541 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Receivables Turnover significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Receivables Turnover should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Vivid Seats's current Receivables Turnover of 3.75 is 52.4% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Receivables Turnover mean?
A high Receivables Turnover can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The accounts receivables turnover ratio measures the number of times a company collects its average accounts receivable balance. It is calculated as Revenue divided by Average Accounts Receivable. View historical data on Vivid Seats and its competitors. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Receivables Turnover is 7.87 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Vivid Seats's current Receivables Turnover is 3.75. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Vivid Seats stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vivid Seats (SEAT) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $4.10, compared to a current price of $7.02 — trading 71.2% above its estimated fair value. The current Receivables Turnover is 3.75 and 52.4% below the Interactive Media industry median of 7.87. Vivid Seats' overall GF Score™ is 58/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Receivables Turnover calculated?
Receivables Turnover is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Vivid Seats (SEAT), the current Receivables Turnover is 3.75 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Vivid Seats (SEAT) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vivid Seats stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of $7.02 is trading 71.2% above its estimated GF Value™ of $4.10.
GuruFocus considers Vivid Seats to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for SEAT:
Receivables Turnover: 3.75
GF Value™: $4.10 vs. price of $7.02 (71.2% above fair value)
Industry Position: 52.4% below the Interactive Media median (#129 of 541)
No single metric tells the full story. See the SEAT stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Vivid Seats Inc is an online ticket marketplace for connecting fans to live events and artists. It is the official ticketing partner of brands in the entertainment industry, providing tickets for sports, concerts, theatres, and comedy events in the United States, Canada, and Japan. It operates in two segments: Marketplace, which generates maximum revenue, and Resale. The Marketplace segment acts as an intermediary between ticket buyers, sellers, and partners, earning revenue from processing ticket sales for live events and facilitating the booking of hotel rooms and packages on websites and mobile applications. The Resale segment acquires tickets to resell on secondary ticket marketplaces, including its own, and offers internal research and development support for Skybox.
58GF Score
Get the complete analysis for SEAT
Receivables Turnover is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
SEAT has been successfully added to your 
