Business Description
ISIN : US8292141053
Total Employee Number:
213Financial Strength
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash-To-Debt | 102.65 | |||||
Equity-to-Asset | 0.91 | |||||
Debt-to-EBITDA | 0.03 | |||||
Interest Coverage | N/A |
N/A
|
N/A
| |||
Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | |||||
Altman Z-Score | 17.07 | |||||
Beneish M-Score | -3.02 | |||||
WACC vs ROIC | ||||||
Growth Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate | 14.9 | |||||
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate | -6.4 | |||||
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate | -18.6 | |||||
3-Year FCF Growth Rate | 2.2 | |||||
3-Year Book Growth Rate | -11 | |||||
Future 3-5Y Total Revenue Growth Rate Estimate | 5.32 |
Momentum Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-Day RSI | 61.45 | |||||
9-Day RSI | 63.71 | |||||
14-Day RSI | 63.41 | |||||
3-1 Month Momentum % | 9.69 | |||||
6-1 Month Momentum % | 49.88 | |||||
12-1 Month Momentum % | 28.9 |
Liquidity Ratio
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Ratio | 5.54 | |||||
Quick Ratio | 5.54 | |||||
Cash Ratio | 3.68 | |||||
Days Sales Outstanding | 64.07 | |||||
Days Payable | 14.65 |
Dividend & Buy Back
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio | 0.2 | |||||
Shareholder Yield % | 0.11 |
Profitability Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Margin % | 63.38 | |||||
Operating Margin % | 14.02 | |||||
Net Margin % | 9.88 | |||||
EBITDA Margin % | 20.86 | |||||
FCF Margin % | 26.39 | |||||
OCF Margin % | 30.4 | |||||
ROE % | 6.25 | |||||
ROA % | 5.76 | |||||
ROIC % | 7.39 | |||||
3-Year ROIIC % | -16.14 | |||||
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % | 83.05 | |||||
ROCE % | 8.84 | |||||
Years of Profitability over Past 10-Year | 9 | |||||
Moat Score | 5 | |||||
Tariff Resilience Score | 8 |
GF Value Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE Ratio | 46 | |||||
Forward PE Ratio | 38.72 | |||||
PE Ratio without NRI | 29.16 | |||||
Shiller PE Ratio | 96.81 | |||||
Price-to-Owner-Earnings | 25.56 | |||||
PS Ratio | 4.53 | |||||
PB Ratio | 2.68 | |||||
Price-to-Tangible-Book | 5.49 | |||||
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow | 17.16 | |||||
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow | 14.91 | |||||
EV-to-EBIT | 28.05 | |||||
EV-to-EBITDA | 18.85 | |||||
EV-to-Revenue | 3.93 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-Revenue | 4.7 | |||||
EV-to-FCF | 14.9 | |||||
Price-to-GF-Value | 0.52 | |||||
Price-to-Projected-FCF | 1.26 | |||||
Price-to-Median-PS-Value | 0.33 | |||||
Price-to-Graham-Number | 2.67 | |||||
| Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value | 6.07 | |||||
| Price-to-Net-Cash | 10.34 | |||||
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % | 3.57 | |||||
FCF Yield % | 5.82 | |||||
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % | 1.69 |
Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Historical Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Historical Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Guru Trades
See DetailsInsider Trades
See DetailsGurus Latest Trades with NAS:SLP
Peter Lynch Chart
Performance
Annualized Return % Â
Total Annual Return % Â
Simulations Plus Inc Executives
DetailsAnalyst Estimate
Key Statistics
| Name | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) (Mil $) | 82.058 | ||
| EPS (TTM) ($) | 0.4 | ||
| Beta | 1.378 | ||
| 3-Year Sharpe Ratio | -0.35 | ||
| 3-Year Sortino Ratio | -0.46 | ||
| Volatility % | 45.54 | ||
| 14-Day RSI | 63.41 | ||
| 14-Day ATR ($) | 0.068988 | ||
| 20-Day SMA ($) | 18.3585 | ||
| 12-1 Month Momentum % | 28.9 | ||
| 52-Week Range ($) | 11.09 - 21.01 | ||
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 20.22 |
Piotroski F-Score Details
| Component | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piotroski F-Score | 7 | ||
| Positive ROA | |||
| Positive CFROA | |||
| Higher ROA yoy | |||
| CFROA > ROA | |||
| Lower Leverage yoy | |||
| Higher Current Ratio yoy | |||
| Less Shares Outstanding yoy | |||
| Higher Gross Margin yoy | |||
| Higher Asset Turnover yoy |
Simulations Plus Inc Filings
| Filing Date | Document Date | Form | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Filing Data | ||||
Simulations Plus Inc Stock Events
| Event | Date | Price ($) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General meeting for 2026 | 2027-02-12 14:00 | In 168 days | ||
| First quarter earnings conference call for 2027 | 2027-01-08 17:00 | In 133 days | ||
| First quarter earnings results for 2027 | 2027-01-08 | In 132 days | ||
| Fourth quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-12-01 17:00 | In 95 days | ||
| Annual report for 2026 | 2026-12-01 | In 94 days | ||
| Fourth quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-12-01 | In 94 days | ||
| Third quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 18.27 (-0.16%) | ||
| Third quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 18.27 (-0.16%) | ||
| Project Optimus: Oncology Dose Optimization Based on Clinical Pharmacology Strategy and MIDD Approach | 2026-05-26 11:00 | 15.37 (+0.39%) | ||
| Second quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-04-09 17:00 | 13.00 (-1.52%) |
Simulations Plus Inc Frequently Asked Questions
Guru Commentaries on NAS:SLP
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) faced challenges this quarter due to lowered guidance stemming from drug research funding and tariff uncertainty. This resulted in a drop in its stock price. The manager noted that SLP was one of the largest detractors from relative return within the Technology sector, indicating concerns about its performance amidst broader market conditions.
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) faced challenges this quarter due to lowered guidance stemming from drug research funding and tariff uncertainty. This resulted in a drop in its stock price. The manager noted that SLP was one of the largest detractors from relative return within the Technology sector, indicating concerns about its performance amidst broader market conditions.
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) faced challenges this quarter due to lowered guidance stemming from drug research funding and tariff uncertainty. This resulted in a drop in its stock price. The company was one of the largest detractors from relative return within the Technology sector, indicating significant headwinds that may impact its performance going forward.
