SELECT id, `name`, primary_key, `key`, treemapgroup, name_cn, zacks_table_name, compare_key, compare_display_name from gurufocu_main.financial_definition where termpagedisplay=1 and `key` = 'EBITDA_per_share'
RMESF (Red Metal Resources) EBITDA per Share
Red Metal Resources's EBITDA per Share for the
three
months ended in Oct. 2023 was $-0.00.
Its EBITDA per Share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Oct. 2023 was $-0.01.
During the past 3 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was -53.60% per year.
During the past 5 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was -30.50% per year.
During the past 10 years, the average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate was 5.90% per year.
Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA per Share growth rate using EBITDA per Share data.
The historical rank and industry rank for Red Metal Resources's EBITDA per Share or its related term are showing as below:
RMESF'
s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -425.4 Med: 23.7 Max: 53.5
Current: -53.6
During the past 13 years, the highest 3-Year average EBITDA per Share Growth Rate of Red Metal Resources was 53.50% per year. The lowest was -425.40% per year. And the median was 23.70% per year.
RMESF's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked worse than 89.86% of 1854
companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 8.75
vs RMESF: -53.60
Red Metal Resources's EBITDA for the
three
months ended in Oct. 2023 was $-0.08 Mil.
During the past 3 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was -66.50% per year.
During the past 5 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was -42.10% per year.
During the past 10 years, the average EBITDA Growth Rate was -2.70% per year.
Please click Growth Rate Calculation Example (GuruFocus) to see how GuruFocus calculates Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT)'s revenue growth rate. You can apply the same method to get the EBITDA Growth Rate using EBITDA data.
During the past 13 years, the highest 3-Year average EBITDA Growth Rate of Red Metal Resources was 40.80% per year. The lowest was -137.80% per year. And the median was -0.05% per year.
Red Metal Resources EBITDA per Share Historical Data
The historical data trend for Red Metal Resources's EBITDA per Share can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
* Premium members only.
Red Metal Resources Annual Data
Trend
Jan14
Jan15
Jan16
Jan17
Jan18
Jan19
Jan20
Jan21
Jan22
Jan23
EBITDA per Share
-0.01
-0.01
-
-0.03
-0.02
Red Metal Resources Quarterly Data
Jan19
Apr19
Jul19
Oct19
Jan20
Apr20
Jul20
Oct20
Jan21
Apr21
Jul21
Oct21
Jan22
Apr22
Jul22
Oct22
Jan23
Apr23
Jul23
Oct23
EBITDA per Share
-
-
-
-
-
Red Metal Resources EBITDA per Share Calculation
EBITDA per Share is the amount of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) per outstanding share of the company's stock.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) is what the company earns before it expenses interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Red Metal Resources's EBITDA per Share for the fiscal year that ended in Jan. 2023 is calculated as
EBITDA per Share for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended in Oct. 2023 adds up the quarterly data reported by the company within the most recent 12 months, which was $-0.01
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Red Metal Resources (OTCPK:RMESF) EBITDA per Share Explanation
EBITDA is a cash flow measure that ignores changes in working capital. EBITDA minus Depreciation, and Amortization (DA) equals EBIT. EBIT is profit before interest and taxes. Of course, Interest and taxes need to be paid.
While depreciation and amortization expenses do not need to be paid in cash, assets - especially tangible assets - do need to be replaced over time. EBITDA is not a measure of profit in any sense. EBITDA is a measure of cash generation by a business where the uses of that cash may be more or less discretionary depending on the nature of the business.
The EBITDA of a TV station is largely discretionary. Owners may use much of the EBITDA generated by a TV station as they see fit. The EBITDA of a railroad is largely non-discretionary. Owners must use much of the EBITDA generated by a railroad to replace the physical assets of the railroad or the business will literally fall apart over time.
EBITDA can be thought of as the cash a business generates that is available to:
Add more inventory
Add more receivables
Replace property, plant, and equipment
Add more property, plant, and equipment
Pay interest
Pay taxes
And finally: pay owners
EBITDA is widely used in financial analysis because Depreciation and Amortization are not present day cash expenses. Depreciation and amortization are the spreading out of the costs of assets over the time in which those assets provide benefits. Today's depreciation and amortization expenses relate to assets bought in the past. The assets being expensed may or may not need to be replaced in the future. And the cost to replace the assets may be more or less than it was in the past. For this reason, the depreciation and amortization expenses a company records in the present year may have no relationship to the actual cash costs needed to maintain its assets in future years.
A company's depreciation expense depends on both its expectations about the assets it owns and its choice of accounting methods. Two companies owning identical assets may have different depreciation expenses because they have different expectations about the useful lives of those assets and because they make different accounting choices.
Analysts use EBITDA to remove this element of personal choice from a company's accounting statements. The use of EBITDA is an attempt to make the results of different companies more comparable and uniform.
Be Aware
Although depreciation is not a cash cost, it is a real business cost because the company has to pay for the fixed assets when they purchase them. Both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger hate the idea of EBITDA because in this calculation, depreciation is not counted as an expense.
EBITDA over Revenue is a good metric for comparing the operating efficiencies between companies because EBITDA is less vulnerable to companies' accounting choices. For this reason, EBITDA is used in ranking the Predictability of Companies.
Red Metal Resources EBITDA per Share Related Terms
Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Red Metal Resources's EBITDA per Share provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.
Red Metal Resources (Red Metal Resources) Business Description
Red Metal Resources Ltd is involved in acquiring and exploring mineral properties in Chile. The company's interest in exploration and evaluation assets consisted of three active copper-gold projects on two properties, namely the Farellon and Perth Projects both located on the Carrizal Property, and the Mateo Project located on the Mateo Property.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
RMESF has been successfully added to your 