Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Australian Agricultural CoASAGF 75 Debt-to-EBITDA is 4.25 as of Mar. 2026, which is 64% above its 10-year median of 2.59. GuruFocus rates ASAGF with a GF Score™ of 75/100 and a GF Value™ of $1.20 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,550 Consumer Packaged Goods companies, Australian Agricultural Co ranks worse than 55.48% on this metric.
Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
The historical rank and industry rank for Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:
ASAGF'
s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.45 Med: 2.59 Max: 8.83
Current: 2.47
During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Australian Agricultural Co was 8.83. The lowest was -5.45. And the median was 2.59.
ASAGF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than 55.48% of 1550
companies
in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry
Industry Median: 2.06
vs ASAGF: 2.47
Australian Agricultural Co (OTCPK:ASAGF) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation
A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.
According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.
Australian Agricultural Co Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms
Australian Agricultural Co Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
For the Farm Products subindustry, Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Australian Agricultural Co Debt-to-EBITDA vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry
For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data,
the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Mar. 2026) EBITDA data.
Australian Agricultural Co (ASAGF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.25 as of Mar. 2026. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Australian Agricultural Co. This is 64% above median its historical median of 2.59. According to the industry distribution chart, Australian Agricultural Co ranks #860 out of 1550 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, placing it in the top 55.5%.
Is Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Australian Agricultural Co's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.25 is 64% above median its 10-year median of 2.59. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.06. Australian Agricultural Co's value of 4.25 is 106.3% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Australian Agricultural Co ranks #860 out of 1550 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Australian Agricultural Co has a GF Score™ of 75/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Australian Agricultural Co's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to ADM and BG?
According to the Consumer Packaged Goods industry distribution chart, Australian Agricultural Co ranks #860 out of 1550 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Australian Agricultural Co in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.06. Australian Agricultural Co's value of 4.25 is 106.3% above this benchmark. While the company's 10-year median is 2.59 vs. the industry median of 2.06, Australian Agricultural Co has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 2.06, based on 1,550 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Australian Agricultural Co's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 4.25 is 106.3% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Australian Agricultural Co. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 2.06 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Australian Agricultural Co's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 4.25, which is 64% above median its own 10-year median of 2.59. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Australian Agricultural Co stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Australian Agricultural Co (ASAGF) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $1.20, compared to a current price of $0.94 — trading 22% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 4.25, which is 64% above median its 10-year median of 2.59 and 106.3% above the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 2.06. Australian Agricultural Co's overall GF Score™ is 75/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Australian Agricultural Co (ASAGF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 4.25 as of Mar. 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Australian Agricultural Co (ASAGF) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Australian Agricultural Co stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $0.94 is trading 22% below its estimated GF Value™ of $1.20.
GuruFocus considers Australian Agricultural Co to be Modestly Undervalued.
Key valuation signals for ASAGF:
Debt-to-EBITDA: 4.25 (64% above median its 10-year median of 2.59)
GF Value™: $1.20 vs. price of $0.94 (22% below fair value)
Industry Position: 106.3% above the Consumer Packaged Goods median (#860 of 1550)
No single metric tells the full story. See the ASAGF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd is Australia's integrated cattle and beef producer. The company operates owned cattle stations, leased stations, owned feedlots, owned farms and leased farm, located throughout Queensland and the Northern Territory. Its brands are Westholme, 1824, and Darling Downs. It derives revenue through the production and sale of cattle and branded beef products across domestic and international markets. Geographically, it operates in South Korea, USA, China, Australia, Canada, and Others with majority of revenue deriving from cattle sales in Australia.
75GF Score
Get the complete analysis for ASAGF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
ASAGF has been successfully added to your 
