RFNDF (Rural Funds Group) Debt-to-EBITDA : 5.87 (As of Dec. 2025) — 21% Above Median


RFNDF Rural Funds Group RFNDF
79 GF Score
Price $1.38
GF Value $1.71
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 12 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA?

Rural Funds Group RFNDF -1.43% 79 Debt-to-EBITDA is 5.87 as of Dec. 2025, which is 21% above its 10-year median of 4.87. GuruFocus rates RFNDF with a GF Score™ of 79/100 and a GF Value™ of $1.71 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 12 warning signs investors should review. Among 580 REITs companies, Rural Funds Group ranks worse than 61.9% on this metric.

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Rural Funds Group's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $36.42 Mil. Rural Funds Group's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $526.95 Mil. Rural Funds Group's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $96.01 Mil. Rural Funds Group's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was 5.87.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

RFNDF' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4.87   Max: 11.47
Current: 7.76

During the past 12 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Rural Funds Group was 11.47. The lowest was 2.00. And the median was 4.87.

RFNDF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
61.9% of 580 companies
in the REITs industry
Industry Median: 6.495 vs RFNDF: 7.76

Rural Funds Group  (OTCPK:RFNDF) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms


Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

Rural Funds Group Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.56 2.00 5.17 6.68 11.47

Rural Funds Group Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.58 7.16 11.72 10.94 5.87

RFNDF vs EQIX, AMT, DLR: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison

For the REIT - Specialty subindustry, Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA vs REITs Industry

For the REITs industry and Real Estate sector, Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.


RFNDF
79GF Score
Rural Funds Group RFNDF
Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Rural Funds Group Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Jun. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(30.583 + 497.444) / 46.039
=11.47

Rural Funds Group's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(36.419 + 526.949) / 96.008
=5.87

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Debt-to-EBITDA →
What does a Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.87 mean?
Rural Funds Group (RFNDF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.87 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Rural Funds Group. This is 21% above median its historical median of 4.87. Over the past decade, Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 2.00 to 11.47. According to the industry distribution chart, Rural Funds Group ranks #359 out of 580 companies in the REITs industry, placing it in the top 61.9%.
Is Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Rural Funds Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.87 is 21% above median its 10-year median of 4.87. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 11.47. The REITs industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 6.50. Rural Funds Group's value of 5.87 is 9.6% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Rural Funds Group ranks #359 out of 580 companies in the REITs industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Rural Funds Group has a GF Score™ of 79/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Rural Funds Group's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to EQIX and AMT?
According to the REITs industry distribution chart, Rural Funds Group ranks #359 out of 580 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Rural Funds Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 6.50. Rural Funds Group's value of 5.87 is 9.6% below this benchmark. Historically, Rural Funds Group's own Debt-to-EBITDA has ranged from 2.00 to 11.47 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.87 vs. the industry median of 6.50, Rural Funds Group has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a REITs company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among REITs companies is 6.50, based on 580 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Rural Funds Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 5.87 is 9.6% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Rural Funds Group. For the REITs industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 6.50 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Rural Funds Group's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 5.87, which is 21% above median its own 10-year median of 4.87. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Rural Funds Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Rural Funds Group (RFNDF) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $1.71, compared to a current price of $1.38 — trading 19.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 5.87, which is 21% above median its 10-year median of 4.87 and 9.6% below the REITs industry median of 6.50. Rural Funds Group's overall GF Score™ is 79/100 with 12 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Rural Funds Group (RFNDF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 5.87 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Rural Funds Group (RFNDF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Rural Funds Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $1.38 is trading 19.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of $1.71. GuruFocus considers Rural Funds Group to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for RFNDF:

  • Debt-to-EBITDA: 5.87 (21% above median its 10-year median of 4.87)
  • GF Value™: $1.71 vs. price of $1.38 (19.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 79/100 with 12 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 9.6% below the REITs median (#359 of 580)

No single metric tells the full story. See the RFNDF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Rural Funds Group Business Description

Industry Real EstateREITs
Other Exchanges RFF:Australia
Address 2 King Street, Level 2, Deakin, Canberra, ACT, AUS, 2600
Rural Funds Group is a real estate investment trust, which holds and leases agricultural property and equipment. The company's operating segment includes Almonds; Cattle; Vineyards; Cropping, Macadamias and Other. It generates maximum revenue from the Almonds segment.
79GF Score

Get the complete analysis for RFNDF

Debt-to-EBITDA is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$1.38
Price
$1.71
GF Value