Clime Investment Management (ASX:CIW) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 20% Above Median


ASX:CIW Clime Investment Management Ltd ASX:CIW
36 GF Score
Price A$0.30
GF Value A$0.35
Valuation Modestly Undervalued
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Clime Investment Management Piotroski F-Score?

Clime Investment Management ASX:CIW 36 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 20% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates ASX:CIW with a GF Score™ of 36/100 and a GF Value™ of A$0.35 (Modestly Undervalued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,601 Asset Management companies, Clime Investment Management ranks better than 82.76% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Clime Investment Management has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

ASX:CIW' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Clime Investment Management was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Clime Investment Management  (ASX:CIW) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Clime Investment Management Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Clime Investment Management Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Clime Investment Management Piotroski F-Score Chart

Clime Investment Management Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 6.00

Clime Investment Management Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 4.00 0.00 6.00 0.00

ASX:CIW vs BLK, BX, KKR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Asset Management subindustry, Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Clime Investment Management Piotroski F-Score vs Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


ASX:CIW
36GF Score
Clime Investment Management Ltd ASX:CIW
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun25) TTM:Last Year (Jun24) TTM:
Net Income was A$0.51 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$-0.21 Mil.
Revenue was A$13.60 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun24)
to the end of this year (Jun25) was (27.663 + 25.059) / 2 = A$26.361 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun24) was A$27.66 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was A$25.06 Mil.
Total Liabilities was A$3.72 Mil.
Net Income was A$-3.77 Mil.

Revenue was A$11.19 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun23)
to the end of last year (Jun24) was (31.163 + 27.663) / 2 = A$29.413 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun23) was A$31.16 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Total Assets was A$27.66 Mil.
Total Liabilities was A$6.81 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Clime Investment Management's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.51. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Clime Investment Management's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.21. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=0.511/27.663
=0.01847233

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun23)
=-3.772/31.163
=-0.12104098

Clime Investment Management's return on assets of this year was 0.01847233. Clime Investment Management's return on assets of last year was -0.12104098. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Clime Investment Management's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.51. Clime Investment Management's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.21. ==> -0.21 <= 0.51 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=0/26.361
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun23 to Jun24
=0/29.413
=0

Clime Investment Management's gearing of this year was 0. Clime Investment Management's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=25.059/3.719
=6.73810164

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=27.663/6.806
=4.06450191

Clime Investment Management's current ratio of this year was 6.73810164. Clime Investment Management's current ratio of last year was 4.06450191. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Clime Investment Management's number of shares in issue this year was 75.691. Clime Investment Management's number of shares in issue last year was 73.164. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=0.511/13.6
=0.03757353

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=-3.772/11.185
=-0.33723737

Clime Investment Management's net margin of this year was 0.03757353. Clime Investment Management's net margin of last year was -0.33723737. ==> This year's net margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun24)
=13.6/27.663
=0.49163142

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun23)
=11.185/31.163
=0.35891923

Clime Investment Management's asset turnover of this year was 0.49163142. Clime Investment Management's asset turnover of last year was 0.35891923. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Clime Investment Management has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Clime Investment Management (ASX:CIW) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Clime Investment Management and its competitors. This is 20% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Clime Investment Management ranks #276 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, placing it in the top 17.2%.
Is Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Clime Investment Management's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Asset Management industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Clime Investment Management's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Clime Investment Management ranks #276 out of 1601 companies in the Asset Management industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Clime Investment Management has a GF Score™ of 36/100 and is considered Modestly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Clime Investment Management's Piotroski F-Score compare to BLK and BX?
According to the Asset Management industry distribution chart, Clime Investment Management ranks #276 out of 1601 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Clime Investment Management in the top 17% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Clime Investment Management's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Clime Investment Management's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Clime Investment Management has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Asset Management company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Asset Management companies is 5.00, based on 1,601 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Clime Investment Management's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Clime Investment Management and its competitors. For the Asset Management industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Clime Investment Management's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Clime Investment Management stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Clime Investment Management (ASX:CIW) is currently considered Modestly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is A$0.35, compared to a current price of A$0.30 — trading 14.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% above the Asset Management industry median of 5.00. Clime Investment Management's overall GF Score™ is 36/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Clime Investment Management (ASX:CIW), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Clime Investment Management (ASX:CIW) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Clime Investment Management stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of A$0.30 is trading 14.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of A$0.35. GuruFocus considers Clime Investment Management to be Modestly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for ASX:CIW:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: A$0.35 vs. price of A$0.30 (14.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 36/100 with 2 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Asset Management median (#276 of 1601)

No single metric tells the full story. See the ASX:CIW stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Clime Investment Management Business Description

Address 20 Hunter Street, Level 12, Sydney, NSW, AUS, 2000
Clime Investment Management Ltd is engaged in providing integrated wealth solutions to clients by operating under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) granted Australian Financial Services Licenses (AFSLs). The Group engages in various activities such as; providing private wealth advisory services; providing licensee services to financial advisers; offering online equity research and valuation tools to investors; and acting as investment manager for various funds. The company's reportable segments are; Fund Management; Advice; and Corporate Centre. A majority of its revenue is generated from the Investment Management segment. Geographically, the company operates only in Australia.
36GF Score

Get the complete analysis for ASX:CIW

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

A$0.30
Price
A$0.35
GF Value