GMER (Good Gaming) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jul. 14, 2026) — 33% Above Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Good Gaming Piotroski F-Score?

Good Gaming GMER +9.43% Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 14, 2026, which is 33% above its 10-year median of 3.00. Among 550 Interactive Media companies, Good Gaming ranks worse than 61.45% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Good Gaming has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

GMER' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Good Gaming was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Good Gaming  (OTCPK:GMER) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Good Gaming Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Good Gaming Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Good Gaming Piotroski F-Score Chart

Good Gaming Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00

Good Gaming Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 4.00

GMER vs UOKAF, AIBT, SPQS: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia subindustry, Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Good Gaming Piotroski F-Score vs Interactive Media Industry

For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -0.053 + -0.051 + -0.051 + -0.063 = $-0.22 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.003 + 0.017 + -0.009 + 0.011 = $0.02 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(0.056 + 0.035 + 0.044 + 0.091 + 0.078) / 5 = $0.0608 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $0.06 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.08 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.25 Mil.
Net Income was -0.32 + -0.178 + -0.11 + -0.081 = $-0.69 Mil.

Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.076 + -0.019 + 0.168 + 0 = $0.07 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(0.333 + 0.18 + 0.125 + 0.092 + 0.056) / 5 = $0.1572 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $0.33 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.06 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1.01 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Good Gaming's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.22. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Good Gaming's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.02. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-0.218/0.056
=-3.89285714

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.689/0.333
=-2.06906907

Good Gaming's return on assets of this year was -3.89285714. Good Gaming's return on assets of last year was -2.06906907. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Good Gaming's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.22. Good Gaming's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.02. ==> 0.02 > -0.22 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0/0.0608
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0/0.1572
=0

Good Gaming's gearing of this year was 0. Good Gaming's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.078/1.249
=0.06244996

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0.056/1.009
=0.0555005

Good Gaming's current ratio of this year was 0.06244996. Good Gaming's current ratio of last year was 0.0555005. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Good Gaming's number of shares in issue this year was 129.117. Good Gaming's number of shares in issue last year was 128.873. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0.073/0
=

Good Gaming's gross margin of this year was . Good Gaming's gross margin of last year was . ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=0/0.056
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=0/0.333
=0

Good Gaming's asset turnover of this year was 0. Good Gaming's asset turnover of last year was 0. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Good Gaming has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Good Gaming (GMER) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jul. 14, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Good Gaming and its competitors. This is 33% above median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Good Gaming ranks #338 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, placing it in the top 61.5%.
Is Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Good Gaming's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33% above median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Interactive Media industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Good Gaming's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Good Gaming ranks #338 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is below the industry midpoint.
How does Good Gaming's Piotroski F-Score compare to UOKAF and AIBT?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Good Gaming ranks #338 out of 550 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Good Gaming in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Good Gaming's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Good Gaming's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Good Gaming has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Interactive Media company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Interactive Media companies is 5.00, based on 550 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Good Gaming's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Good Gaming and its competitors. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Good Gaming's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% above median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Good Gaming stock overvalued right now?
Good Gaming (GMER) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% above median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 20% below the Interactive Media industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Good Gaming (GMER), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jul. 14, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Good Gaming Business Description

Address 415 McFarlan Road, Suite 108, Kennett Square, PA, USA, 19348
Good Gaming Inc is engaged in the distribution of mobile games, mainly through partnerships with telecommunications providers to pre-install games on mobile devices.