Golden Energy PowerIGLDF 16 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 60% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates IGLDF with a GF Score™ of 16/100. The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 359 Telecommunication Services companies, Golden Energy Power ranks worse than 96.94% on this metric.
Warning Sign:
Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Golden Energy Power has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
IGLDF'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2 Med: 5 Max: 6
Current: 2
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Golden Energy Power was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.
Golden Energy Power (OTCPK:IGLDF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Golden Energy Power Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Golden Energy Power Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
IGLDF vs TMUS, VZ, T: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Telecom Services subindustry, Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Golden Energy Power Piotroski F-Score vs Telecommunication Services Industry
For the Telecommunication Services industry and Communication Services sector, Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Golden Energy Power's current Net Income (TTM) was -13.10.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Golden Energy Power's return on assets of this year was -4.81256891. Golden Energy Power's return on assets of last year was -3.79582712.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Golden Energy Power's gearing of this year was 0.07774376. Golden Energy Power's gearing of last year was 0.02830587.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Golden Energy Power's current ratio of this year was 0.66484485. Golden Energy Power's current ratio of last year was 2.87840671.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Golden Energy Power's number of shares in issue this year was 16.582. Golden Energy Power's number of shares in issue last year was 4.587.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Golden Energy Power's gross margin of this year was 0.29213483. Golden Energy Power's gross margin of last year was .
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Golden Energy Power's asset turnover of this year was 1.79897097. Golden Energy Power's asset turnover of last year was 0.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
=
3
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Golden Energy Power has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Golden Energy Power (IGLDF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Golden Energy Power and its competitors. This is 60% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Golden Energy Power ranks #348 out of 359 companies in the Telecommunication Services industry, placing it in the top 96.9%.
Is Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Golden Energy Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Telecommunication Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Golden Energy Power's value of 2 is 66.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Golden Energy Power ranks #348 out of 359 companies in the Telecommunication Services industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Golden Energy Power has a GF Score™ of 16/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Golden Energy Power's Piotroski F-Score compare to TMUS and VZ?
According to the Telecommunication Services industry distribution chart, Golden Energy Power ranks #348 out of 359 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Golden Energy Power in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Golden Energy Power's value of 2 is 66.7% below this benchmark. Historically, Golden Energy Power's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, Golden Energy Power has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Telecommunication Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Telecommunication Services companies is 6.00, based on 359 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Golden Energy Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 66.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Golden Energy Power and its competitors. For the Telecommunication Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Golden Energy Power's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 60% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Golden Energy Power stock overvalued right now?
Golden Energy Power (IGLDF) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 2. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 60% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 66.7% below the Telecommunication Services industry median of 6.00. Golden Energy Power's overall GF Score™ is 16/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Golden Energy Power (IGLDF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Golden Energy Power Ltd formerly Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd is communications group in Israel. The company's principal subsidiary is B Communications, through which it owns the controlling interest in Bezeq which is a telecommunications service provider. Bezeq mainly provides communications services in Israel offering a broad range of telecommunications operations and services, including domestic fixed-line, cellular and international communication services, Internet services, multi-channel television, television and radio broadcasts, satellite broadcasts, customer call centers, maintenance and development of communications infrastructures. It also provides communications services to other communications providers and the supply and maintenance of equipment on customer premises.
16GF Score
Get the complete analysis for IGLDF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
IGLDF has been successfully added to your 
