Switch to:

SIGA Technologies Piotroski F-Score

: 3 (As of Today)
View and export this data going back to 1997. Start your Free Trial

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SIGA Technologies has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

NAS:SIGA' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 3   Max: 7
Current: 3
1
7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of SIGA Technologies was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.

SIGA Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their local exchange's currency.

* Premium members only.

SIGA Technologies Annual Data
Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Piotroski F-Score Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 3.00 1.00 6.00 2.00

SIGA Technologies Quarterly Data
Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20
Piotroski F-Score Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
Competitive Comparison
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap.

SIGA Technologies Piotroski F-Score Distribution

* The bar in red indicates where SIGA Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their local exchange's currency.

This Year (Jun20) TTM:Last Year (Jun19) TTM:
Net Income was -1.206 + -4.503 + -8.898 + 20.89 = $6.28 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.398 + -14.264 + 3.322 + -9.089 = $-19.63 Mil.
Revenue was 8.111 + 4.264 + 2.62 + 40.349 = $55.34 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.031 + 0.21 + -0.639 + 32.842 = $36.44 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun19)
to the end of this year (Jun20) was
(203.092 + 203.011 + 198.566 + 118.574 + 120.417) / 5 = $168.732 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun19) was $203.09 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $105.07 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $15.56 Mil.		 Net Income was 388.05 + 52.391 + 1.63 + -3.162 = $438.91 Mil.

Revenue was 471.075 + 1.569 + 10.459 + 3.908 = $487.01 Mil.
Gross Profit was 372.186 + -1.506 + 5.546 + 1.869 = $378.10 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun18)
to the end of last year (Jun19) was
(128.341 + 143.727 + 203.444 + 206.439 + 203.092) / 5 = $177.0086 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun18) was $128.34 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $77.78 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $121.54 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $11.12 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SIGA Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 6.28. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SIGA Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -19.63. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun19)
=6.283/203.092
=0.03093672

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun18)
=438.909/128.341
=3.41986583

SIGA Technologies's return on assets of this year was 0.03093672. SIGA Technologies's return on assets of last year was 3.41986583. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

SIGA Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 6.28. SIGA Technologies's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -19.63. ==> -19.63 <= 6.28 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun20)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun19 to Jun20
=0/168.732
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Jun19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun18 to Jun19
=77.778/177.0086
=0.43940238

SIGA Technologies's gearing of this year was 0. SIGA Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.43940238. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun20)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=105.067/15.562
=6.75151009

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=121.535/11.123
=10.92645869

SIGA Technologies's current ratio of this year was 6.75151009. SIGA Technologies's current ratio of last year was 10.92645869. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

SIGA Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 80.517. SIGA Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 82.115. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=36.444/55.344
=0.65849957

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=378.095/487.011
=0.77635823

SIGA Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.65849957. SIGA Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.77635823. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun19)
=55.344/203.092
=0.27250704

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun18)
=487.011/128.341
=3.79466421

SIGA Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 0.27250704. SIGA Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 3.79466421. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SIGA Technologies has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

SIGA Technologies  (NAS:SIGA) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.

SIGA Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

SIGA Technologies Piotroski F-Score Headlines

No Headline

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)