Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
PaidPAYD 54 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 01, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates PAYD with a GF Score™ of 54/100 and a GF Value™ of $2.53 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,734 Software companies, Paid ranks better than 59.51% on this metric.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Paid has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The historical rank and industry rank for Paid's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
PAYD'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2 Med: 5 Max: 8
Current: 5
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Paid was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Paid Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Paid Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Paid's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
PAYD vs ILLR, MNDO, BMR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Software - Application subindustry, Paid's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Paid Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry
For the Software industry and Technology sector, Paid's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Paid's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Paid's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.26.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Paid's current ratio of this year was 0.83238636. Paid's current ratio of last year was 0.64472456.
==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Paid's number of shares in issue this year was 8.553. Paid's number of shares in issue last year was 8.074.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Paid's gross margin of this year was 0.21640964. Paid's gross margin of last year was 0.21666755.
==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Paid's asset turnover of this year was 2.76073932. Paid's asset turnover of last year was 2.5589276.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
1
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
=
5
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Paid has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
Paid (PAYD) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Aug. 01, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Paid and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Paid's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Paid ranks #1107 out of 2734 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 40.5%.
Is Paid's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Paid's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 8.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Paid's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Paid ranks #1107 out of 2734 companies in the Software industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, Paid has a GF Score™ of 54/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Paid's Piotroski F-Score compare to ILLR and MNDO?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Paid ranks #1107 out of 2734 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This puts Paid in the upper half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Paid's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Paid's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Paid has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,734 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Paid's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Paid and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Paid's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Paid stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Paid (PAYD) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $2.53, compared to a current price of $2.46 — trading 2.8% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Software industry median of 5.00. Paid's overall GF Score™ is 54/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Paid (PAYD), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Aug. 01, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Paid (PAYD) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Paid stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of $2.46 is trading 2.8% below its estimated GF Value™ of $2.53.
GuruFocus considers Paid to be Fairly Valued.
Key valuation signals for PAYD:
Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
GF Value™: $2.53 vs. price of $2.46 (2.8% below fair value)
Industry Position: 0% at the Software median (#1107 of 2734)
No single metric tells the full story. See the PAYD stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Paid Inc has developed a full line of SaaS-based business services, including PaidPayments, PaidCart, PaidShipping, and PaidWeb. These solutions are developed to provide businesses with a streamlined experience for website creation, online sales, payment collection, and shipping all in one platform. It operates in four segments: Client services, eCommerce services, Shipping coordination and label generation services, and Corporate operations. The majority of its revenue comes from its Shipping coordination & label generation services segment. Its geographical segments are Canada and the United States, of which the majority of its revenue comes from Canada.
54GF Score
Get the complete analysis for PAYD
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
PAYD has been successfully added to your 
