Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.
Brogent TechnologiesROCO:5263 +1.02%68 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Aug. 25, 2026, which is 75% above its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates ROCO:5263 with a GF Score™ of 68/100 and a GF Value™ of NT$149.17 (Significantly Undervalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 834 Travel & Leisure companies, Brogent Technologies ranks better than 88.13% on this metric.
Good Sign:
Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Brogent Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Brogent Technologies's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
ROCO:5263'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2 Med: 4 Max: 7
Current: 7
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Brogent Technologies was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Brogent Technologies Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Brogent Technologies Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Brogent Technologies's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
ROCO:5263 vs AS, HAS, LTH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Leisure subindustry, Brogent Technologies's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Brogent Technologies Piotroski F-Score vs Travel & Leisure Industry
For the Travel & Leisure industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Brogent Technologies's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Brogent Technologies's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
This Year (Jun26) TTM:
Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 71.853 + 7.551 + 47.244 + 29.333 = NT$156 Mil. Cash Flow from Operations was 314.024 + 115.018 + 137.36 + -53.602 = NT$513 Mil. Revenue was 349.348 + 422.243 + 329.123 + 527.194 = NT$1,628 Mil. Gross Profit was 201.549 + 169.001 + 166.713 + 212.52 = NT$750 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(5337.067 + 5571.998 + 5965.267 + 6178.207 + 6489.748) / 5 = NT$5908.4574 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was NT$5,337 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$824 Mil. Total Current Assets was NT$3,283 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was NT$1,804 Mil.
Net Income was 28.993 + 60.203 + -44.787 + -231.803 = NT$-187 Mil.
Revenue was 402.172 + 508.216 + 258.931 + 308.271 = NT$1,478 Mil. Gross Profit was 184.626 + 226.201 + 66.337 + 124.011 = NT$601 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(5323.814 + 5421.993 + 5448.892 + 5576.466 + 5337.067) / 5 = NT$5421.6464 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was NT$5,324 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was NT$888 Mil. Total Current Assets was NT$2,690 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was NT$1,192 Mil.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Brogent Technologies's current Net Income (TTM) was 156.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Brogent Technologies's return on assets of this year was 0.02922598. Brogent Technologies's return on assets of last year was -0.0351992.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Brogent Technologies's gearing of this year was 0.13946974. Brogent Technologies's gearing of last year was 0.16382072.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Brogent Technologies's current ratio of this year was 1.82002386. Brogent Technologies's current ratio of last year was 2.25738346.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Brogent Technologies's number of shares in issue this year was 72.012. Brogent Technologies's number of shares in issue last year was 68.195.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Brogent Technologies's gross margin of this year was 0.4605807. Brogent Technologies's gross margin of last year was 0.40686185.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Brogent Technologies's asset turnover of this year was 0.30501922. Brogent Technologies's asset turnover of last year was 0.27754351.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
=
7
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Brogent Technologies has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
Brogent Technologies (ROCO:5263) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Aug. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Brogent Technologies and its competitors. This is 75% above median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Brogent Technologies' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Brogent Technologies ranks #99 out of 834 companies in the Travel & Leisure industry, placing it in the top 11.9%.
Is Brogent Technologies' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Brogent Technologies' current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Travel & Leisure industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Brogent Technologies' value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Brogent Technologies ranks #99 out of 834 companies in the Travel & Leisure industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Brogent Technologies has a GF Score™ of 68/100 and is considered Significantly Undervalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Brogent Technologies' Piotroski F-Score compare to AS and HAS?
According to the Travel & Leisure industry distribution chart, Brogent Technologies ranks #99 out of 834 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Brogent Technologies in the top 12% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Brogent Technologies' value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, Brogent Technologies' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Brogent Technologies has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Travel & Leisure company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Travel & Leisure companies is 5.00, based on 834 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Brogent Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Brogent Technologies and its competitors. For the Travel & Leisure industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Brogent Technologies's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 75% above median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Brogent Technologies stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Brogent Technologies (ROCO:5263) is currently considered Significantly Undervalued. The stock's GF Value™ is NT$149.17, compared to a current price of NT$89.00 — trading 40.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 40% above the Travel & Leisure industry median of 5.00. Brogent Technologies' overall GF Score™ is 68/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Brogent Technologies (ROCO:5263), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Aug. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Brogent Technologies (ROCO:5263) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Brogent Technologies stock appears to be undervalued.
The current stock price of NT$89.00 is trading 40.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of NT$149.17.
GuruFocus considers Brogent Technologies to be Significantly Undervalued.
Key valuation signals for ROCO:5263:
Piotroski F-Score: 7 (75% above median its 10-year median of 4.00)
GF Value™: NT$149.17 vs. price of NT$89.00 (40.3% below fair value)
Industry Position: 40% above the Travel & Leisure median (#99 of 834)
No single metric tells the full story. See the ROCO:5263 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Brogent Technologies Inc mainly engaged in the research, development, design, production and sales of simulator rides and its key components and peripheral products, embedded media software, streaming media, 3D dynamic simulation technology, internet interaction media and multiple-monitor setups. The Group has a single operation segment. The company has presence in Taiwan, Asia, Europe, Americas, and Oceania. The company generates majority of revenue from Asia. The company's projects are Digital Aquarium, Flying Theater, Racing Simulator, Motion Theater, o-Ride, o-Ride E, v-Ride 360, v-Ride Vessel.
68GF Score
Get the complete analysis for ROCO:5263
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
ROCO:5263 has been successfully added to your 
