Solid PowerSLDP -3.30%60 Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates SLDP with a GF Score™ of 60/100 and a GF Value™ of $1.43 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,286 Vehicles & Parts companies, Solid Power ranks worse than 95.41% on this metric.
Warning Sign:
Piotroski F-Score of 2 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Solid Power has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
SLDP'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1 Med: 3 Max: 4
Current: 2
During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Solid Power was 4. The lowest was 1. And the median was 3.
Solid Power (NAS:SLDP) Piotroski F-Score Explanation
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Solid Power Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Solid Power Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
SLDP vs FOXF, SMP, MLR: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Auto Parts subindustry, Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Solid Power Piotroski F-Score vs Vehicles & Parts Industry
For the Vehicles & Parts industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Solid Power's current Net Income (TTM) was -91.29.
==> Negative ==> Score 0.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Solid Power's return on assets of this year was -0.21766852. Solid Power's return on assets of last year was -0.17526009.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Solid Power's gearing of this year was 0.01532753. Solid Power's gearing of last year was 0.01663601.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Solid Power's current ratio of this year was 16.11206897. Solid Power's current ratio of last year was 23.90229169.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Solid Power's number of shares in issue this year was 217.3. Solid Power's number of shares in issue last year was 181.405.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Solid Power's gross margin of this year was -0.44369838. Solid Power's gross margin of last year was 0.03215784.
==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Solid Power's asset turnover of this year was 0.0355111. Solid Power's asset turnover of last year was 0.03741209.
==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
0
+
0
+
0
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
0
=
2
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Solid Power has an F-score of 2. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.
Solid Power (SLDP) has a Piotroski F-Score of 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Solid Power and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 4.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Solid Power ranks #1227 out of 1286 companies in the Vehicles & Parts industry, placing it in the top 95.4%.
Is Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Solid Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 4.00. The Vehicles & Parts industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Solid Power's value of 2 is 60% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Solid Power ranks #1227 out of 1286 companies in the Vehicles & Parts industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Solid Power has a GF Score™ of 60/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Solid Power's Piotroski F-Score compare to FOXF and SMP?
According to the Vehicles & Parts industry distribution chart, Solid Power ranks #1227 out of 1286 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Solid Power in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Solid Power's value of 2 is 60% below this benchmark. Historically, Solid Power's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 4.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Solid Power has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Vehicles & Parts company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Vehicles & Parts companies is 5.00, based on 1,286 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Solid Power's current Piotroski F-Score of 2 is 60% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Solid Power and its competitors. For the Vehicles & Parts industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Solid Power's current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Solid Power stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Solid Power (SLDP) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $1.43, compared to a current price of $2.65 — trading 85.3% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 2, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 60% below the Vehicles & Parts industry median of 5.00. Solid Power's overall GF Score™ is 60/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Solid Power (SLDP), the current Piotroski F-Score is 2 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Solid Power (SLDP) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Solid Power stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of $2.65 is trading 85.3% above its estimated GF Value™ of $1.43.
GuruFocus considers Solid Power to be Significantly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for SLDP:
Piotroski F-Score: 2 (33% below median its 10-year median of 3.00)
GF Value™: $1.43 vs. price of $2.65 (85.3% above fair value)
Industry Position: 60% below the Vehicles & Parts median (#1227 of 1286)
No single metric tells the full story. See the SLDP stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Solid Power Inc develops solid-state battery technology and manufacturing processes. Its sulfide-based solid electrolyte material replaces the liquid or gel electrolyte used in traditional lithium-ion battery cells and enables improvement in energy density, battery life and safety performance. The company produces electrolytes on two pilot manufacturing lines using a batch manufacturing process for customer sampling and internal cell development, and manufactures solid-state cells on pre-pilot and pilot cell manufacturing lines. Its cell manufacturing processes are developed around industry-standard lithium-ion battery manufacturing processes and equipment, and it manufactures all cell designs, including cathodes and anodes, using materials sourced from external suppliers.
60GF Score
Get the complete analysis for SLDP
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
SLDP has been successfully added to your 
