TRNR (Interactive Strength) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — 20% Below Median


TRNR Interactive Strength Inc TRNR
13 GF Score
Price $0.57
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Interactive Strength Piotroski F-Score?

Interactive Strength TRNR +8.63% 13 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates TRNR with a GF Score™ of 13/100. The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 95 Personal Services companies, Interactive Strength ranks worse than 66.32% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Interactive Strength has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TRNR' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 4

During the past 6 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Interactive Strength was 6. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.

Interactive Strength  (NAS:TRNR) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Interactive Strength Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Interactive Strength Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Interactive Strength Piotroski F-Score Chart

Interactive Strength Annual Data
Trend Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A N/A 5.00 6.00 5.00

Interactive Strength Quarterly Data
Dec20 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00

TRNR vs YYGH, IVPR, EJH: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Personal Services subindustry, Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Interactive Strength Piotroski F-Score vs Personal Services Industry

For the Personal Services industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TRNR
13GF Score
Interactive Strength Inc TRNR
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -2.18 + -5.231 + -9.956 + -10.743 = $-28.11 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -2.198 + -2.418 + -2.248 + -2.587 = $-9.45 Mil.
Revenue was 1.219 + 4.815 + 4.139 + 5.141 = $15.31 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.194 + 0.825 + 0.584 + 1.609 = $2.82 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(37.816 + 86.24 + 85.438 + 46.843 + 60.644) / 5 = $63.3962 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $37.82 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $4.71 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $14.05 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $36.48 Mil.
Net Income was -10.637 + -7.141 + -5.762 + -6.603 = $-30.14 Mil.

Revenue was 0.621 + 2.014 + 2.383 + 1.356 = $6.37 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.88 + -0.288 + -0.41 + -0.304 = $-1.88 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(39.564 + 37.765 + 37.753 + 34.17 + 37.816) / 5 = $37.4136 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $39.56 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2.04 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $11.44 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $21.26 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Interactive Strength's current Net Income (TTM) was -28.11. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Interactive Strength's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -9.45. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-28.11/37.816
=-0.74333615

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-30.143/39.564
=-0.76187949

Interactive Strength's return on assets of this year was -0.74333615. Interactive Strength's return on assets of last year was -0.76187949. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Interactive Strength's current Net Income (TTM) was -28.11. Interactive Strength's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -9.45. ==> -9.45 > -28.11 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=4.707/63.3962
=0.07424735

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=2.037/37.4136
=0.05444544

Interactive Strength's gearing of this year was 0.07424735. Interactive Strength's gearing of last year was 0.05444544. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=14.049/36.478
=0.38513625

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=11.444/21.256
=0.53838916

Interactive Strength's current ratio of this year was 0.38513625. Interactive Strength's current ratio of last year was 0.53838916. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Interactive Strength's number of shares in issue this year was 1.049. Interactive Strength's number of shares in issue last year was 0.038. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2.824/15.314
=0.18440643

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-1.882/6.374
=-0.295262

Interactive Strength's gross margin of this year was 0.18440643. Interactive Strength's gross margin of last year was -0.295262. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=15.314/37.816
=0.40496086

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=6.374/39.564
=0.16110606

Interactive Strength's asset turnover of this year was 0.40496086. Interactive Strength's asset turnover of last year was 0.16110606. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+1+1+0+0+0+1+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Interactive Strength has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Interactive Strength (TRNR) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Interactive Strength and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Interactive Strength ranks #63 out of 95 companies in the Personal Services industry, placing it in the top 66.3%.
Is Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Interactive Strength's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 6.00. The Personal Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Interactive Strength's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Interactive Strength ranks #63 out of 95 companies in the Personal Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Interactive Strength has a GF Score™ of 13/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Interactive Strength's Piotroski F-Score compare to YYGH and IVPR?
According to the Personal Services industry distribution chart, Interactive Strength ranks #63 out of 95 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Interactive Strength in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Interactive Strength's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Interactive Strength's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Interactive Strength has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Personal Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Personal Services companies is 5.00, based on 95 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Interactive Strength's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Interactive Strength and its competitors. For the Personal Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Interactive Strength's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Interactive Strength stock overvalued right now?
Interactive Strength (TRNR) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Personal Services industry median of 5.00. Interactive Strength's overall GF Score™ is 13/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Interactive Strength (TRNR), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Interactive Strength Business Description

Address 1005 Congress Avenue, Suite 925, Austin, TX, USA, 78701
Interactive Strength Inc provides an integrated home fitness platform that allows its customers to participate in interactive wellness and strength-based training sessions. Its health coaching services encompass guidance and coaching on nutrition, recovery, sleep, and other health and lifestyle categories. The company generates revenue from sales of its connected fitness products, membership revenue, and personal training revenue.
13GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TRNR

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.57
Price