Draft (TSE:5070) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — Near Median


TSE:5070 Draft Inc TSE:5070
64 GF Score
Price 円744.00
GF Value 円775.61
! 9 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Draft Piotroski F-Score?

Draft TSE:5070 64 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates TSE:5070 with a GF Score™ of 64/100 and a GF Value™ of 円775.61. The stock has 9 warning signs investors should review.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Draft has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Draft's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:5070' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 5

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Draft was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Draft  (TSE:5070) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Draft Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Draft Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Draft's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Draft Piotroski F-Score Chart

Draft Annual Data
Trend Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 5.00 5.00 2.00 6.00 5.00

Draft Semi-Annual Data
Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Sep20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 6.00 0.00 5.00 0.00

TSE:5070 vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Draft's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Draft Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Draft's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Draft's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSE:5070
64GF Score
Draft Inc TSE:5070
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec24) TTM:Last Year (Dec23) TTM:
Net Income was 円646 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円2,025 Mil.
Revenue was 円12,277 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円3,799 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec23)
to the end of this year (Dec24) was (7465.272 + 6458.285) / 2 = 円6961.7785 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec23) was 円7,465 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円219 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円4,170 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円1,871 Mil.
Net Income was 円516 Mil.

Revenue was 円10,702 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円3,523 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec22)
to the end of last year (Dec23) was (5724.932 + 7465.272) / 2 = 円6595.102 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec22) was 円5,725 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円515 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円5,875 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円3,180 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Draft's current Net Income (TTM) was 646. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Draft's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 2,025. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=646.107/7465.272
=0.08654835

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=516.249/5724.932
=0.09017557

Draft's return on assets of this year was 0.08654835. Draft's return on assets of last year was 0.09017557. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Draft's current Net Income (TTM) was 646. Draft's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 2,025. ==> 2,025 > 646 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=219.021/6961.7785
=0.0314605

Gearing (Last Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=515.061/6595.102
=0.0780975

Draft's gearing of this year was 0.0314605. Draft's gearing of last year was 0.0780975. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4169.546/1870.509
=2.229097

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5874.631/3179.628
=1.84758437

Draft's current ratio of this year was 2.229097. Draft's current ratio of last year was 1.84758437. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Draft's number of shares in issue this year was 10.081. Draft's number of shares in issue last year was 10.077. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3798.846/12276.867
=0.30943123

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3522.993/10702.431
=0.32917689

Draft's gross margin of this year was 0.30943123. Draft's gross margin of last year was 0.32917689. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec23)
=12276.867/7465.272
=1.64453043

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec22)
=10702.431/5724.932
=1.86944247

Draft's asset turnover of this year was 1.64453043. Draft's asset turnover of last year was 1.86944247. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Draft has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
Draft (TSE:5070) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Draft and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Draft's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00.
Is Draft's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Draft's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Draft's value of 5 is 0% at this industry median. Overall, Draft has a GF Score™ of 64/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Draft's Piotroski F-Score compare to PWR and FIX?
Draft's Piotroski F-Score of 5 can be compared against companies in the Construction industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Draft's value of 5 is 0% at this benchmark. Historically, Draft's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Draft has consistently been at the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,729 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Draft's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 0% at the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Draft and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Draft's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Draft stock overvalued right now?
Draft (TSE:5070) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 5. The stock's GF Value™ is 円775.61, compared to a current price of 円744.00 — trading 4.1% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 0% at the Construction industry median of 5.00. Draft's overall GF Score™ is 64/100 with 9 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Draft (TSE:5070), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Draft (TSE:5070) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Draft stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of 円744.00 is trading 4.1% below its estimated GF Value™ of 円775.61.

Key valuation signals for TSE:5070:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: 円775.61 vs. price of 円744.00 (4.1% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 64/100 with 9 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 0% at the Construction median

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSE:5070 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Draft Business Description

Address 5-6-19 Minamiaoyama, Minato-ku, 2nd & 3rd Floor, Alteka Plaza Harajuku, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, JPN, 150-0001
Draft Inc is engaged in planning spaces for offices, commercial facilities, urban development, and environmental design. The company's projects include interior design, furniture and product, and architecture. The Group operates in a single segment, the design business.
64GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSE:5070

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

円744.00
Price
円775.61
GF Value