Albus a.d (XBEL:ALBS) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 30, 2026) — 17% Above Median


XBEL:ALBS Albus a.d XBEL:ALBS
48 GF Score
Price RSD250.00
GF Value RSD339.63
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Albus a.d Piotroski F-Score?

Albus a.d XBEL:ALBS 48 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 30, 2026, which is 17% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates XBEL:ALBS with a GF Score™ of 48/100 and a GF Value™ of RSD339.63. The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Albus a.d has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

XBEL:ALBS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Albus a.d was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Albus a.d  (XBEL:ALBS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Albus a.d Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Albus a.d Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Albus a.d Piotroski F-Score Chart

Albus a.d Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 4.00 8.00 6.00 7.00

Albus a.d Semi-Annual Data
Jun13 Dec13 Jun14 Dec14 Jun15 Dec15 Jun16 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 8.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 7.00

XBEL:ALBS vs PG, CL, EL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Household & Personal Products subindustry, Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Albus a.d Piotroski F-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


XBEL:ALBS
48GF Score
Albus a.d XBEL:ALBS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was RSD49.5 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was RSD62.3 Mil.
Revenue was RSD544.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was RSD189.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (1101.292 + 1020.643) / 2 = RSD1060.9675 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was RSD1,101.3 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was RSD0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was RSD315.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was RSD372.5 Mil.
Net Income was RSD31.3 Mil.

Revenue was RSD717.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was RSD204.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (1078.974 + 1101.292) / 2 = RSD1090.133 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was RSD1,079.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was RSD0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was RSD380.8 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was RSD346.8 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Albus a.d's current Net Income (TTM) was 49.5. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Albus a.d's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=49.451/1101.292
=0.04490271

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=31.256/1078.974
=0.02896826

Albus a.d's return on assets of this year was 0.04490271. Albus a.d's return on assets of last year was 0.02896826. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Albus a.d's current Net Income (TTM) was 49.5. Albus a.d's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.3. ==> 62.3 > 49.5 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=0/1060.9675
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=0/1090.133
=0

Albus a.d's gearing of this year was 0. Albus a.d's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=315.243/372.509
=0.84626949

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=380.769/346.779
=1.09801632

Albus a.d's current ratio of this year was 0.84626949. Albus a.d's current ratio of last year was 1.09801632. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Albus a.d's number of shares in issue this year was 0.437. Albus a.d's number of shares in issue last year was 0.437. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=189.587/544.86
=0.34795544

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=204.917/717.452
=0.28561771

Albus a.d's gross margin of this year was 0.34795544. Albus a.d's gross margin of last year was 0.28561771. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=544.86/1101.292
=0.49474617

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=717.452/1078.974
=0.6649391

Albus a.d's asset turnover of this year was 0.49474617. Albus a.d's asset turnover of last year was 0.6649391. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+0+1+1+0
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Albus a.d has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
Albus a.d (XBEL:ALBS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 30, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Albus a.d and its competitors. This is 17% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00.
Is Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Albus a.d's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 8.00. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Albus a.d's value of 7 is 40% above this industry median. Overall, Albus a.d has a GF Score™ of 48/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score compare to PG and CL?
Albus a.d's Piotroski F-Score of 7 can be compared against companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Albus a.d's value of 7 is 40% above this benchmark. Historically, Albus a.d's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Albus a.d has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 5.00, based on 1,909 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Albus a.d's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 40% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Albus a.d and its competitors. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Albus a.d's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Albus a.d stock overvalued right now?
Albus a.d (XBEL:ALBS) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 7. The stock's GF Value™ is RSD339.63, compared to a current price of RSD250.00 — trading 26.4% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 40% above the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 5.00. Albus a.d's overall GF Score™ is 48/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Albus a.d (XBEL:ALBS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 30, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Albus a.d (XBEL:ALBS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Albus a.d stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of RSD250.00 is trading 26.4% below its estimated GF Value™ of RSD339.63.

Key valuation signals for XBEL:ALBS:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: RSD339.63 vs. price of RSD250.00 (26.4% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 48/100 with 7 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% above the Consumer Packaged Goods median

No single metric tells the full story. See the XBEL:ALBS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Albus a.d Business Description

Address Privrednikova 10, Novi Sad, SRB, 21000
Albus a.d is a producer of cleaning and cosmetic products. It is engaged in the industrial production of liquid dishwashing detergent, and fabric softener. Its products include household cleaning products, concentrated hand-dishwashing liquid detergents, concentrated fabric softeners, and baby and kids cosmetics.
48GF Score

Get the complete analysis for XBEL:ALBS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

RSD250.00
Price
RSD339.63
GF Value