Paragon Union Bhd (XKLS:9407) Piotroski F-Score: N/A (As of Sep. 04, 2026)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

XKLS:9407 Paragon Union Bhd XKLS:9407
50 GF Score
Price RM1.46
GF Value RM4.00
Valuation Significantly Undervalued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Paragon Union Bhd Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Paragon Union Bhd has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Paragon Union Bhd's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Paragon Union Bhd was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Paragon Union Bhd  (XKLS:9407) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Paragon Union Bhd Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Paragon Union Bhd Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Paragon Union Bhd's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Paragon Union Bhd Piotroski F-Score Chart

Paragon Union Bhd Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 7.00 3.00 N/A

Paragon Union Bhd Quarterly Data
Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 N/A

XKLS:9407 vs ORLY, AZO, GPC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Auto Parts subindustry, Paragon Union Bhd's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Paragon Union Bhd Piotroski F-Score vs Vehicles & Parts Industry

For the Vehicles & Parts industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Paragon Union Bhd's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Paragon Union Bhd's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


XKLS:9407
50GF Score
Paragon Union Bhd XKLS:9407
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun26) TTM:Last Year (Jun25) TTM:
Net Income was 1.156 + 2.566 + -0.736 + -0.716 = RM2.3 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 3.557 + 3.845 + 9.567 + 0.178 = RM17.1 Mil.
Revenue was 28.992 + 41.223 + 28.416 + 28.099 = RM126.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was 8.617 + 12.669 + 6.707 + 5.276 = RM33.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun25)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(0 + 202.118 + 209.734 + 212.054 + 217.935) / 5 = RM210.46025 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun25) was RM0.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was RM5.2 Mil.
Total Current Assets was RM42.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was RM20.8 Mil.
Net Income was 0.025 + -2.427 + -1.448 + -1.283 = RM-5.1 Mil.

Revenue was 15.916 + 14.632 + 23.952 + 24.467 = RM79.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.491 + 2.026 + 4.826 + 4.759 = RM14.1 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun24)
to the end of last year (Jun25) was
(108.811 + 108.568 + 194.811 + 197.454 + 0) / 5 = RM152.411 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun24) was RM108.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was RM0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was RM0.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was RM0.0 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Paragon Union Bhd's current Net Income (TTM) was 2.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Paragon Union Bhd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 17.1. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun25)
=2.27/0
=

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=-5.133/108.811
=-0.04717354

Paragon Union Bhd's return on assets of this year was . Paragon Union Bhd's return on assets of last year was -0.04717354. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Paragon Union Bhd's current Net Income (TTM) was 2.3. Paragon Union Bhd's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 17.1. ==> 17.1 > 2.3 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun25 to Jun26
=5.209/210.46025
=0.02475052

Gearing (Last Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=0/152.411
=0

Paragon Union Bhd's gearing of this year was 0.02475052. Paragon Union Bhd's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=42.233/20.795
=2.03092089

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Paragon Union Bhd's current ratio of this year was 2.03092089. Paragon Union Bhd's current ratio of last year was . ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Paragon Union Bhd's number of shares in issue this year was 101.118. Paragon Union Bhd's number of shares in issue last year was 89.592. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=33.269/126.73
=0.26251874

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=14.102/78.967
=0.17858093

Paragon Union Bhd's gross margin of this year was 0.26251874. Paragon Union Bhd's gross margin of last year was 0.17858093. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun25)
=126.73/0
=

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun24)
=78.967/108.811
=0.72572626

Paragon Union Bhd's asset turnover of this year was . Paragon Union Bhd's asset turnover of last year was 0.72572626. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+1+0+1+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Paragon Union Bhd has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Is Paragon Union Bhd (XKLS:9407) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Paragon Union Bhd stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of RM1.46 is trading 63.5% below its estimated GF Value™ of RM4.00. GuruFocus considers Paragon Union Bhd to be Significantly Undervalued.

Key valuation signals for XKLS:9407:

  • Piotroski F-Score: N/A
  • GF Value™: RM4.00 vs. price of RM1.46 (63.5% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 50/100 with 3 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the XKLS:9407 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Paragon Union Bhd Business Description

Address Lot 14 Jalan CJ 1/1, Kawasan Perindustrian Cheras Jaya, Batu 11, Cheras, SGR, MYS, 43200
Paragon Union Bhd, through its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacturing and distribution of commercial carpets, rugs, automotive carpets, and NVH components. It has three reportable business segments: Automotive, Recycling, and Commercial. The Automotive segment covers car carpets and components, while the Commercial segment produces commercial carpets. The Recycling segment includes metal recycling and waste management. The Automotive segment generates the highest revenue for the company. Geographically, the company operates in Malaysia, Australia, China, Hong Kong, and other markets, with the majority of revenue derived from Malaysia.
50GF Score

Get the complete analysis for XKLS:9407

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

RM1.46
Price
RM4.00
GF Value