Retail Estates (XAMS:RET) GF Score: 75/100 (As of Jul. 05, 2026) — Near Median


What is Retail Estates GF Score?

Retail Estates XAMS:RET 75 GF Score is 75 as of Jul. 05, 2026, which is 6% below its 10-year median of 80.00. GuruFocus rates XAMS:RET with a GF Score™ of 75/100. The stock has 9 warning signs investors should review.

Retail Estates has the GF Score of 75, which implies that the company is Likely to have average performance.

The GF Score is a stock performance ranking system developed by GuruFocus using five aspects of valuation, which has been found to be closely correlated to the long-term performances of stocks by backtesting from 2006 to 2021. The stocks with a higher GF Score generally generate higher returns than those with lower GF Scores. Therefore, when picking stocks, investors should invest in companies with high GF Scores. The GF Score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 as the highest rank.

GF Score takes following five key aspects into consideration:

1. Financial Strength : 3/10
2. Profitability Rank : 8/10
3. Growth Rank : 4/10
4. GF Value Rank : 6/10
5. Momentum Rank : 9/10

Each one of these components is ranked and the ranks also have positive correlation with the long term performances of stocks. The GF score is calculated using the five key aspects of analysis. Through backtesting, we know that each of these key aspects has a different impact on the stock price performance. Thus, they are weighted differently when calculating the total score. The Profitability Rank and the Growth Rank are weighted fully, while other parameters have less weight.

Based on research and backtesting result, GuruFocus believes Retail Estates is Likely to have average performance.

Please click GF Score to see more details on the GF Score's 5 Key Aspects of Analysis.


Retail Estates  (XAMS:RET) GF Score Explanation

Based on the historical long-term performances among five valuation aspects, the GF Score is found to be closely correlated to the long-term performances of stocks. It ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 as the highest. GuruFocus divided GF Score into following 5 categories:

GF Score Performance Potential and All-in-One Screener Examples (1)
91 - 100Highest outperformance potential
81 - 90Good outperformance potential
71 - 80Likely to have average performance
51 - 70Poor future performance potential
0 - 50Worst future performance potential, or not enough data

(1) These are some simple examples. You can access our GF Score filter under All-in-One Screener’s Fundamental tab.


Retail Estates GF Score Related Terms


XAMS:RET vs SPG, O, KIM: GF Score Comparison

For the REIT - Retail subindustry, Retail Estates's GF Score, along with its competitors' market caps and GF Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Retail Estates GF Score vs REITs Industry

For the REITs industry and Real Estate sector, Retail Estates's GF Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Retail Estates's GF Score falls into.


Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about GF Score →
What does a GF Score of 75 mean?
Retail Estates (XAMS:RET) has a GF Score of 75 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GF Score is a stock performance ranking system developed by GuruFocus using five aspects of valuation. View historical data on Retail Estates and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 80.00.
Is Retail Estates' GF Score too high?
Retail Estates' current GF Score of 75 is near median its 10-year median of 80.00. Overall, Retail Estates has a GF Score™ of 75/100, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Retail Estates' GF Score compare to SPG and O?
Retail Estates' GF Score of 75 can be compared against companies in the REITs industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good GF Score for a REITs company?
A good GF Score depends on the REITs industry context. However, GF Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high GF Score mean?
A high GF Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. GF Score is a stock performance ranking system developed by GuruFocus using five aspects of valuation. View historical data on Retail Estates and its competitors. Retail Estates's current GF Score is 75, which is near median its own 10-year median of 80.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Retail Estates stock overvalued right now?
Retail Estates (XAMS:RET) has a current GF Score of 75. The current GF Score is 75, which is near median its 10-year median of 80.00. Retail Estates' overall GF Score™ is 75/100 with 9 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is GF Score calculated?
GF Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Retail Estates (XAMS:RET), the current GF Score is 75 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Retail Estates Business Description

Industry Real EstateREITs
Address Industrielaan 6, Ternat, BEL, 1740
Retail Estates SA is a real estate investment trust that invests mainly in retail properties. It is a niche player specialised in making out-of town retail properties located on the periphery of residential areas or along main access roads to urban centres available to users. It has distinguished between two geographical segments: Belgium and the Netherlands. The majority of revenue comes from Belgium.