KPEAD (Kun Peng International) Beneish M-Score: -8.08 (As of Jun. 24, 2026)


KPEAD Kun Peng International Ltd KPEAD
29 GF Score
Price $0.38
GF Value $0.26
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 7 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Kun Peng International Beneish M-Score?

Kun Peng International KPEAD +99.20% 29 Beneish M-Score is -8.08 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus rates KPEAD with a GF Score™ of 29/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.26 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 7 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,087 Retail - Cyclical companies, Kun Peng International ranks better than 99.17% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -8.08 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

KPEAD' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.2   Med: -7.5   Max: 21.59
Current: -8.08

During the past 6 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Kun Peng International was 21.59. The lowest was -18.20. And the median was -7.50.


Kun Peng International Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Kun Peng International Beneish M-Score Chart

Kun Peng International Annual Data
Trend Sep20 Sep21 Sep22 Sep23 Sep24 Sep25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 0.00 9.32 -9.19 6.70 -4.79

Kun Peng International Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -12.40 -18.20 -4.79 21.59 -8.08

KPEAD vs MOGU, SBDS, YJ: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Internet Retail subindustry, Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Kun Peng International Beneish M-Score vs Retail - Cyclical Industry

For the Retail - Cyclical industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score falls into.


KPEAD
29GF Score
Kun Peng International Ltd KPEAD
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Kun Peng International Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Kun Peng International for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 6.354+0.528 * 2.0834+0.404 * 0.0432+0.892 * 0.3163+0.115 * 1.0204
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.5844+4.679 * -2.104918-0.327 * 1.4811
=-8.08

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was $0.20 Mil.
Revenue was 0.022 + 0.175 + 0.365 + 0.108 = $0.67 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.058 + 0.061 + 0.217 + 0.024 = $0.24 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.34 Mil.
Total Assets was $0.61 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.27 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.37 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $1.66 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $9.68 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.05 Mil.
Net Income was -0.394 + -0.266 + -0.38 + -0.045 = $-1.09 Mil.
Non Operating Income was -0.005 + 0.031 + -0.046 + 0.391 = $0.37 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.003 + 0.036 + -0.278 + 0.073 = $-0.17 Mil.
Total Receivables was $0.10 Mil.
Revenue was 0.609 + 0.357 + 0.48 + 0.672 = $2.12 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0.511 + 0.301 + 0.303 + 0.492 = $1.61 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.33 Mil.
Total Assets was $0.80 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $0.42 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.61 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $3.31 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $8.66 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(0.201 / 0.67) / (0.1 / 2.118)
=0.3 / 0.047214
=6.354

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(1.607 / 2.118) / (0.244 / 0.67)
=0.758735 / 0.364179
=2.0834

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (0.341 + 0.267) / 0.61) / (1 - (0.328 + 0.415) / 0.804)
=0.003279 / 0.075871
=0.0432

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=0.67 / 2.118
=0.3163

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0.609 / (0.609 + 0.415)) / (0.373 / (0.373 + 0.267))
=0.594727 / 0.582813
=1.0204

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(1.661 / 0.67) / (3.314 / 2.118)
=2.479104 / 1.564684
=1.5844

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((0.049 + 9.68) / 0.61) / ((0 + 8.658) / 0.804)
=15.94918 / 10.768657
=1.4811

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-1.085 - 0.371 - -0.172) / 0.61
=-2.104918

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Kun Peng International has a M-score of -8.08 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -8.08 mean?
Kun Peng International (KPEAD) has a Beneish M-Score of -8.08 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Kun Peng International and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #9 out of 1087 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry, placing it in the top 0.8%.
Is Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score too high?
Kun Peng International's current Beneish M-Score is -8.08. Based on the distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #9 out of 1087 companies in the Retail - Cyclical industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Kun Peng International has a GF Score™ of 29/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Kun Peng International's Beneish M-Score compare to MOGU and SBDS?
According to the Retail - Cyclical industry distribution chart, Kun Peng International ranks #9 out of 1087 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Kun Peng International in the top 1% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Retail - Cyclical company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Retail - Cyclical industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Kun Peng International and its competitors. Kun Peng International's current Beneish M-Score is -8.08. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Kun Peng International stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Kun Peng International (KPEAD) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.26, compared to a current price of $0.38 — trading 44.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -8.08. Kun Peng International's overall GF Score™ is 29/100 with 7 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Kun Peng International (KPEAD), the current Beneish M-Score is -8.08 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Kun Peng International (KPEAD) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Kun Peng International stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $0.38 is trading 44.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of $0.26. GuruFocus considers Kun Peng International to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for KPEAD:

  • Beneish M-Score: -8.08
  • GF Value™: $0.26 vs. price of $0.38 (44.4% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 29/100 with 7 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the KPEAD stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Kun Peng International Business Description

Address No 1008-B, Huihe South Street, Room 2069W, Sihui Building, Banbidian Village, Gaobeidian Town, Chaoyang Distrct, Beijing, CHN, 100124
Kun Peng International Ltd through its subsidiaries and VIE is currently engaged in the sale of healthcare and health-related household products through its online platform, King Eagle Mall and physical store (Smart kiosks) as the carrier to provide people with more professional and comprehensive health services. Its products include health care products such as dietary supplements, nutritional health foods, beauty cosmeceuticals, and other categories (for instance, milk powder, and dried fruits) of health foods for supporting the cardiovascular system, and bone joint health. It offers collagen peptides, probiotics, and health foods for improving blood circulation and vein health, as well as household products that can promote and improve a healthier lifestyle.
29GF Score

Get the complete analysis for KPEAD

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$0.38
Price
$0.26
GF Value