Sakurajima Futo Kaisha (TSE:9353) Beneish M-Score: -2.54 (As of Jul. 05, 2026)


TSE:9353 Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Ltd TSE:9353
66 GF Score
Price 円2,760.00
GF Value 円1,949.58
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score?

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha TSE:9353 -1.39% 66 Beneish M-Score is -2.54 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GuruFocus rates TSE:9353 with a GF Score™ of 66/100 and a GF Value™ of 円1,949.58 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 965 Transportation companies, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha ranks worse than 54.2% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.54 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:9353' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.97   Med: -2.54   Max: -2.31
Current: -2.54

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Sakurajima Futo Kaisha was -2.31. The lowest was -2.97. And the median was -2.54.


Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score Chart

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Annual Data
Trend Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.50 -2.97 -2.65 -2.54 -2.54

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Semi-Annual Data
Sep16 Mar17 Sep17 Mar18 Sep18 Mar19 Sep19 Mar20 Sep20 Mar21 Sep21 Mar22 Sep22 Mar23 Sep23 Mar24 Sep24 Mar25 Sep25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.65 0.00 -2.54 0.00 -2.54

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Marine Shipping subindustry, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score vs Transportation Industry

For the Transportation industry and Industrials sector, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score falls into.


TSE:9353
66GF Score
Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Ltd TSE:9353
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Sakurajima Futo Kaisha for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.0196+0.528 * 0.9152+0.404 * 1.1404+0.892 * 0.9821+0.115 * 1.0676
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1+4.679 * -0.033099-0.327 * 0.7808
=-2.54

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was 円402 Mil.
Revenue was 円4,261 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円859 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円1,705 Mil.
Total Assets was 円12,204 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was 円3,660 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was 円399 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was 円0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円1,046 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円1,054 Mil.
Net Income was 円290 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円694 Mil.
Total Receivables was 円402 Mil.
Revenue was 円4,338 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円800 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円2,113 Mil.
Total Assets was 円11,098 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was 円3,532 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was 円414 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was 円0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円1,081 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円1,365 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(402.344 / 4260.693) / (401.779 / 4338.206)
=0.094432 / 0.092614
=1.0196

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(800.244 / 4338.206) / (858.807 / 4260.693)
=0.184464 / 0.201565
=0.9152

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (1705.358 + 3659.586) / 12203.615) / (1 - (2113.094 + 3531.748) / 11098.255)
=0.560381 / 0.491376
=1.1404

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=4260.693 / 4338.206
=0.9821

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(413.915 / (413.915 + 3531.748)) / (398.792 / (398.792 + 3659.586))
=0.104904 / 0.098264
=1.0676

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(0 / 4260.693) / (0 / 4338.206)
=0 / 0
=1

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((1054.113 + 1045.649) / 12203.615) / ((1364.641 + 1081.125) / 11098.255)
=0.172061 / 0.220374
=0.7808

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(290.08 - 0 - 694.003) / 12203.615
=-0.033099

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Sakurajima Futo Kaisha has a M-score of -2.54 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.54 mean?
Sakurajima Futo Kaisha (TSE:9353) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.54 as of Jul. 05, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Sakurajima Futo Kaisha and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha ranks #523 out of 965 companies in the Transportation industry, placing it in the top 54.2%.
Is Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score too high?
Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's current Beneish M-Score is -2.54. Based on the distribution chart, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha ranks #523 out of 965 companies in the Transportation industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha has a GF Score™ of 66/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's Beneish M-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Transportation industry distribution chart, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha ranks #523 out of 965 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places Sakurajima Futo Kaisha in the lower half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Transportation company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Transportation industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on Sakurajima Futo Kaisha and its competitors. Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's current Beneish M-Score is -2.54. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Sakurajima Futo Kaisha stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha (TSE:9353) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is 円1,949.58, compared to a current price of 円2,760.00 — trading 41.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.54. Sakurajima Futo Kaisha's overall GF Score™ is 66/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Sakurajima Futo Kaisha (TSE:9353), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.54 as of Jul. 05, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Sakurajima Futo Kaisha (TSE:9353) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Sakurajima Futo Kaisha stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of 円2,760.00 is trading 41.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of 円1,949.58. GuruFocus considers Sakurajima Futo Kaisha to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for TSE:9353:

  • Beneish M-Score: -2.54
  • GF Value™: 円1,949.58 vs. price of 円2,760.00 (41.6% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 66/100 with 6 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSE:9353 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Business Description

Address Osaka Konohana-ku, Plum-Cho 1-1-11, Osaka-shi, Osaka, JPN, 554-0032
Sakurajima Futo Kaisha Ltd is engaged in the port transportation business in Japan. It is involved in handling cargo, such as coal, coke, raw salt, soda ash, alloyed iron, other minerals, etc.; liquid cargo, including petroleum products and petrochemicals; and frozen and refrigerated products comprising frozen food, chilled food, dry goods, etc. The company also provides barge transportation, warehousing, cargo usage transportation, and customs clearing services.
66GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSE:9353

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

円2,760.00
Price
円1,949.58
GF Value