GreenRoc Strategic Materials (FRA:3WF) Debt-to-EBITDA : -0.02 (As of Nov. 2025)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA?

GreenRoc Strategic Materials FRA:3WF +56.86% Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.02 as of Nov. 2025. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 599 Metals & Mining companies, GreenRoc Strategic Materials ranks worse than 166944.74% on this metric.

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Nov. 2025 was €0.02 Mil. GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Nov. 2025 was €0.00 Mil. GreenRoc Strategic Materials's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Nov. 2025 was €-0.89 Mil. GreenRoc Strategic Materials's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Nov. 2025 was -0.02.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:3WF' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.02   Med: -0.02   Max: -0.02
Current: -0.02

During the past 5 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of GreenRoc Strategic Materials was -0.02. The lowest was -0.02. And the median was -0.02.

FRA:3WF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
100% of 599 companies
in the Metals & Mining industry
Industry Median: 1.16 vs FRA:3WF: -0.02

GreenRoc Strategic Materials  (FRA:3WF) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms


GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

GreenRoc Strategic Materials Annual Data
Trend Nov21 Nov22 Nov23 Nov24 Nov25
Debt-to-EBITDA
N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02

GreenRoc Strategic Materials Semi-Annual Data
Nov21 May22 Nov22 May23 Nov23 May24 Nov24 May25 Nov25
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.02

GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Competitor Comparison

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA vs Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.



GreenRoc Strategic Materials Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

GreenRoc Strategic Materials's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Nov. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.015 + 0) / -0.937
=-0.02

GreenRoc Strategic Materials's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Nov. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.015 + 0) / -0.892
=-0.02

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is two times the quarterly (Nov. 2025) EBITDA data.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Debt-to-EBITDA →
What does a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.02 mean?
GreenRoc Strategic Materials (FRA:3WF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.02 as of Nov. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on GreenRoc Strategic Materials. According to the industry distribution chart, GreenRoc Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry.
Is GreenRoc Strategic Materials' Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
GreenRoc Strategic Materials' current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.02. Based on the distribution chart, GreenRoc Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 599 companies in the Metals & Mining industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does GreenRoc Strategic Materials' Debt-to-EBITDA compare to competitors?
According to the Metals & Mining industry distribution chart, GreenRoc Strategic Materials ranks #999999 out of 599 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places GreenRoc Strategic Materials in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for a Metals & Mining company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Metals & Mining companies is 1.16, based on 599 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on GreenRoc Strategic Materials. For the Metals & Mining industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 1.16 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. GreenRoc Strategic Materials's current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.02. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is GreenRoc Strategic Materials stock overvalued right now?
GreenRoc Strategic Materials (FRA:3WF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of -0.02. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.02. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For GreenRoc Strategic Materials (FRA:3WF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is -0.02 as of Nov. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

GreenRoc Strategic Materials Business Description

Other Exchanges GROC:UK
Address C/o Arch Law Limited, Huckletree Bishopsgate, 8 Bishopsgate, London, GBR, EC2N 4BQ
GreenRoc Strategic Materials PLC operates as a mining company. The Company's principal activities are the development of mining and exploration interests in Greenland, where its subsidiaries hold three separate exploration permits. The company and its subsidiaries own and operate mining projects in Greenland (for graphite and ilmenite) and a proposed active anode material (AAM) plant in Norway. The Subsidiary Companies are GreenRoc Graphite Limited (which owns the Amitsoq licence and proposed AAM plant project) and White Eagle Resources Limited (owner of the Thule Black Sands licence). The Group's objective is to become a key supplier of critical, high-demand, and high-value minerals to fast-growing end markets. The Group currently has one reporting segment, exploration and development.