Prosper Engineering PCL (BKK:PROS) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 30, 2026) — Near Median


BKK:PROS Prosper Engineering PCL BKK:PROS
28 GF Score
Price ฿0.17
GF Value ฿0.44
Valuation Possible Value Trap
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Prosper Engineering PCL Piotroski F-Score?

Prosper Engineering PCL BKK:PROS -5.56% 28 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 30, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates BKK:PROS with a GF Score™ of 28/100 and a GF Value™ of ฿0.44 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,730 Construction companies, Prosper Engineering PCL ranks worse than 65.32% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Prosper Engineering PCL has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

BKK:PROS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Prosper Engineering PCL was 7. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.

Prosper Engineering PCL  (BKK:PROS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Prosper Engineering PCL Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Prosper Engineering PCL Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Prosper Engineering PCL Piotroski F-Score Chart

Prosper Engineering PCL Annual Data
Trend Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 4.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 2.00

Prosper Engineering PCL Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 7.00 5.00 2.00 4.00

BKK:PROS vs PWR, FIX, EME: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Prosper Engineering PCL Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


BKK:PROS
28GF Score
Prosper Engineering PCL BKK:PROS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 4.334 + -5.144 + -156.931 + 1.524 = ฿-156.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 68.837 + -6.359 + -8.881 + 9.032 = ฿62.6 Mil.
Revenue was 211.947 + 164.653 + 127.633 + 113.56 = ฿617.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 19.201 + 10.52 + -118.478 + 8.003 = ฿-80.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(1049.644 + 962.672 + 890.649 + 693.792 + 639.54) / 5 = ฿847.2594 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ฿1,049.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ฿0.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ฿480.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ฿540.4 Mil.
Net Income was 11.106 + 4.376 + -5.806 + 4.685 = ฿14.4 Mil.

Revenue was 323.473 + 427.594 + 422.617 + 325.624 = ฿1,499.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 33.637 + 21.782 + 13.705 + 22.525 = ฿91.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(1054.538 + 1066.8 + 1136.407 + 1017.607 + 1049.644) / 5 = ฿1064.9992 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ฿1,054.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ฿0.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ฿754.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ฿803.6 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Prosper Engineering PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was -156.2. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Prosper Engineering PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.6. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-156.217/1049.644
=-0.14882856

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=14.361/1054.538
=0.01361829

Prosper Engineering PCL's return on assets of this year was -0.14882856. Prosper Engineering PCL's return on assets of last year was 0.01361829. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Prosper Engineering PCL's current Net Income (TTM) was -156.2. Prosper Engineering PCL's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 62.6. ==> 62.6 > -156.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0.379/847.2594
=0.00044732

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.707/1064.9992
=0.00066385

Prosper Engineering PCL's gearing of this year was 0.00044732. Prosper Engineering PCL's gearing of last year was 0.00066385. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=480.477/540.4
=0.88911362

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=753.958/803.631
=0.93818929

Prosper Engineering PCL's current ratio of this year was 0.88911362. Prosper Engineering PCL's current ratio of last year was 0.93818929. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Prosper Engineering PCL's number of shares in issue this year was 551.547. Prosper Engineering PCL's number of shares in issue last year was 551.547. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-80.754/617.793
=-0.13071369

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=91.649/1499.308
=0.06112753

Prosper Engineering PCL's gross margin of this year was -0.13071369. Prosper Engineering PCL's gross margin of last year was 0.06112753. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=617.793/1049.644
=0.58857384

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1499.308/1054.538
=1.42176764

Prosper Engineering PCL's asset turnover of this year was 0.58857384. Prosper Engineering PCL's asset turnover of last year was 1.42176764. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Prosper Engineering PCL has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Prosper Engineering PCL (BKK:PROS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 30, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Prosper Engineering PCL and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Prosper Engineering PCL ranks #1130 out of 1730 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 65.3%.
Is Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Prosper Engineering PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 7.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Prosper Engineering PCL's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Prosper Engineering PCL ranks #1130 out of 1730 companies in the Construction industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Prosper Engineering PCL has a GF Score™ of 28/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Prosper Engineering PCL's Piotroski F-Score compare to PWR and FIX?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, Prosper Engineering PCL ranks #1130 out of 1730 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Prosper Engineering PCL in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Prosper Engineering PCL's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Prosper Engineering PCL's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Prosper Engineering PCL has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,730 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Prosper Engineering PCL's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Prosper Engineering PCL and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Prosper Engineering PCL's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Prosper Engineering PCL stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Prosper Engineering PCL (BKK:PROS) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is ฿0.44, compared to a current price of ฿0.17 — trading 61.4% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Construction industry median of 5.00. Prosper Engineering PCL's overall GF Score™ is 28/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Prosper Engineering PCL (BKK:PROS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 30, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Prosper Engineering PCL (BKK:PROS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Prosper Engineering PCL stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of ฿0.17 is trading 61.4% below its estimated GF Value™ of ฿0.44. GuruFocus considers Prosper Engineering PCL to be Possible Value Trap.

Key valuation signals for BKK:PROS:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (near median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: ฿0.44 vs. price of ฿0.17 (61.4% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 28/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Construction median (#1130 of 1730)

No single metric tells the full story. See the BKK:PROS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Prosper Engineering PCL Business Description

Address Nakniwat Road, No. 11 Soi Nakniwat 20, Ladphrao district, Bangkok, THA, 10230
Prosper Engineering PCL is a provider of electrical and communication systems, air conditioning and ventilation systems, sanitary and fire protection system distribution of materials for M&E systems and maintenance services after completion of installation and architectural works. It operates and installs engineering systems in various types of buildings, shopping centers, large superstores, product distribution centers, mobile telephone network centers, information centers, residential buildings, office buildings, government and public sector buildings, hospitals, and industrial factories. The company has two segments: M&E engineering Segment and Civil & Structure Engineering Segment. It derives maximum revenue from M&E engineering Segment.
28GF Score

Get the complete analysis for BKK:PROS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

฿0.17
Price
฿0.44
GF Value