COSG (Grand Gallery) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Aug. 09, 2026) — Near Median

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Grand Gallery Piotroski F-Score?

Grand Gallery COSG Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 09, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 536 Credit Services companies, Grand Gallery ranks worse than 55.22% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Grand Gallery has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

COSG' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 4   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Grand Gallery was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 4.

Grand Gallery  (OTCPK:COSG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Grand Gallery Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Grand Gallery Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Grand Gallery Piotroski F-Score Chart

Grand Gallery Annual Data
Trend Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Grand Gallery Quarterly Data
Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Jun26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

COSG vs V, MA, AXP: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Credit Services subindustry, Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Grand Gallery Piotroski F-Score vs Credit Services Industry

For the Credit Services industry and Financial Services sector, Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun26) TTM:Last Year (Sep24) TTM:
Net Income was 9.503 + -0.051 + -0.102 + -0.172 = $9.18 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -3.286 + -0.068 + -0.102 + 0 = $-3.46 Mil.
Revenue was -0.036 + 0.019 + 0.019 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep24)
to the end of this year (Jun26) was
(33.32 + 0.043 + 0.024 + 0 + 0.173) / 5 = $8.39 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep24) was $33.32 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $39.05 Mil.
Total Assets was $0.17 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $41.39 Mil.
Net Income was -12.788 + -1.04 + -2.811 + -0.96 = $-17.60 Mil.

Revenue was -0.722 + -0.005 + 0.019 + 0.019 = $-0.69 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep23)
to the end of last year (Sep24) was
(19.445 + 18.655 + 17.71 + 34.046 + 33.32) / 5 = $24.6352 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep23) was $19.45 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $39.05 Mil.
Total Assets was $33.32 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $84.11 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Grand Gallery's current Net Income (TTM) was 9.18. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Grand Gallery's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.46. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep24)
=9.178/33.32
=0.27545018

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=-17.599/19.445
=-0.90506557

Grand Gallery's return on assets of this year was 0.27545018. Grand Gallery's return on assets of last year was -0.90506557. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Grand Gallery's current Net Income (TTM) was 9.18. Grand Gallery's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.46. ==> -3.46 <= 9.18 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep24 to Jun26
=39.054/8.39
=4.65482718

Gearing (Last Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=39.054/24.6352
=1.58529259

Grand Gallery's gearing of this year was 4.65482718. Grand Gallery's gearing of last year was 1.58529259. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun26)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=0.173/41.394
=0.00417935

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=33.32/84.11
=0.3961479

Grand Gallery's current ratio of this year was 0.00417935. Grand Gallery's current ratio of last year was 0.3961479. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Grand Gallery's number of shares in issue this year was 21.075. Grand Gallery's number of shares in issue last year was 0.093. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=9.178/0.002
=4589

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=-17.599/-0.689
=25.54281567

Grand Gallery's net margin of this year was 4589. Grand Gallery's net margin of last year was 25.54281567. ==> This year's net margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep24)
=0.002/33.32
=6.002E-5

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep23)
=-0.689/19.445
=-0.03543327

Grand Gallery's asset turnover of this year was 6.002E-5. Grand Gallery's asset turnover of last year was -0.03543327. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+0+0+0+1+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Grand Gallery has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Grand Gallery (COSG) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Aug. 09, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Grand Gallery and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Grand Gallery ranks #296 out of 536 companies in the Credit Services industry, placing it in the top 55.2%.
Is Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Grand Gallery's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Credit Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Grand Gallery's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Grand Gallery ranks #296 out of 536 companies in the Credit Services industry, which is below the industry midpoint.
How does Grand Gallery's Piotroski F-Score compare to V and MA?
According to the Credit Services industry distribution chart, Grand Gallery ranks #296 out of 536 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Grand Gallery in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Grand Gallery's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Grand Gallery's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Grand Gallery has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Credit Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Credit Services companies is 5.00, based on 536 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Grand Gallery's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Grand Gallery and its competitors. For the Credit Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Grand Gallery's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Grand Gallery stock overvalued right now?
Grand Gallery (COSG) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 4. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Credit Services industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Grand Gallery (COSG), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Aug. 09, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Grand Gallery Business Description

Address 16 Science Park East Avenue, 6th Floor, Harbour View 2, Hong Kong Science Park, NT, Shatin, Hong Kong, HKG
Grand Gallery Inc blockchain DOT technology company. It currently operates an online platform for the sale and distribution of arts and collectibles around the world, through the use of blockchain technologies and minting tokens.