GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Software » Lucas GC Ltd (NAS:LGCL) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Lucas GC (Lucas GC) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of Jun. 07, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2024. Start your Free Trial

What is Lucas GC Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Lucas GC has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LGCL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 6

During the past 4 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Lucas GC was 6. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.


Lucas GC Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Lucas GC Piotroski F-Score Chart

Lucas GC Annual Data
Trend Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 4.00 6.00

Lucas GC Quarterly Data
Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A - 4.00 - 6.00

Competitive Comparison of Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score

For the Software - Application subindustry, Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Net Income was $10.9 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was $-5.1 Mil.
Revenue was $206.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was $58.6 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was (34.604 + 40.87) / 2 = $37.737 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec22) was $34.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $32.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $13.3 Mil.
Net Income was $5.2 Mil.

Revenue was $110.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was $30.9 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec22) was (35.504 + 34.604) / 2 = $35.054 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was $35.5 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $28.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $17.7 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Lucas GC's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.9. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Lucas GC's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -5.1. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=10.878/34.604
=0.31435672

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=5.184/35.504
=0.14601172

Lucas GC's return on assets of this year was 0.31435672. Lucas GC's return on assets of last year was 0.14601172. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Lucas GC's current Net Income (TTM) was 10.9. Lucas GC's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -5.1. ==> -5.1 <= 10.9 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=0/37.737
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=0.012/35.054
=0.00034233

Lucas GC's gearing of this year was 0. Lucas GC's gearing of last year was 0.00034233. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=32.399/13.337
=2.42925695

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=28.078/17.696
=1.58668626

Lucas GC's current ratio of this year was 2.42925695. Lucas GC's current ratio of last year was 1.58668626. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Lucas GC's number of shares in issue this year was 81.133. Lucas GC's number of shares in issue last year was 79.563. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=58.619/206.431
=0.28396413

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=30.867/109.955
=0.28072393

Lucas GC's gross margin of this year was 0.28396413. Lucas GC's gross margin of last year was 0.28072393. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec22)
=206.431/34.604
=5.96552422

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=109.955/35.504
=3.09697499

Lucas GC's asset turnover of this year was 5.96552422. Lucas GC's asset turnover of last year was 3.09697499. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Lucas GC has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Lucas GC  (NAS:LGCL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Lucas GC Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Lucas GC's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Lucas GC (Lucas GC) Business Description

Comparable Companies
Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Xiaoyun Road, Room 5A01, 4th Floor, Air China Building, Sanyuanqiao, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CHN, 100027
Lucas GC Ltd is a technology-driven online agent-centric human capital management service provider targeting professionals based on PaaS in China.