PBI (Pitney Bowes) Piotroski F-Score: 7 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 17% Above Median


PBI Pitney Bowes Inc PBI
58 GF Score
Price $17.48
GF Value $7.57
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Pitney Bowes Piotroski F-Score?

Pitney Bowes PBI +0.63% 58 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 17% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates PBI with a GF Score™ of 58/100 and a GF Value™ of $7.57 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 979 Transportation companies, Pitney Bowes ranks better than 86.82% on this metric.

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pitney Bowes has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Pitney Bowes's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

PBI' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 6   Max: 7
Current: 7

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Pitney Bowes was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.

Pitney Bowes  (NYSE:PBI) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Pitney Bowes Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Pitney Bowes Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Pitney Bowes's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Pitney Bowes Piotroski F-Score Chart

Pitney Bowes Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 7.00

Pitney Bowes Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

PBI vs HUBG, CYRX, RLGT: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Integrated Freight & Logistics subindustry, Pitney Bowes's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Pitney Bowes Piotroski F-Score vs Transportation Industry

For the Transportation industry and Industrials sector, Pitney Bowes's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Pitney Bowes's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


PBI
58GF Score
Pitney Bowes Inc PBI
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 29.975 + 51.963 + 27.337 + 58.138 = $167 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 111.388 + 66.848 + 221.7 + 44.155 = $444 Mil.
Revenue was 461.909 + 459.675 + 477.625 + 477.413 = $1,877 Mil.
Gross Profit was 247.526 + 244.279 + 262.936 + 259.783 = $1,015 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(3269.703 + 3238.838 + 3255.211 + 3168.951 + 3147.308) / 5 = $3216.0022 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $3,270 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,875 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,129 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,818 Mil.
Net Income was -24.867 + -138.472 + -37.373 + 35.422 = $-165 Mil.

Revenue was 489.745 + 499.463 + 516.121 + 493.42 = $1,999 Mil.
Gross Profit was 250.479 + 261.473 + 277.601 + 269.121 = $1,059 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(4103.047 + 4078.402 + 3647.716 + 3397.516 + 3269.703) / 5 = $3699.2768 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $4,103 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2,000 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $1,185 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,489 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pitney Bowes's current Net Income (TTM) was 167. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Pitney Bowes's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 444. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=167.413/3269.703
=0.05120129

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-165.29/4103.047
=-0.0402847

Pitney Bowes's return on assets of this year was 0.05120129. Pitney Bowes's return on assets of last year was -0.0402847. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Pitney Bowes's current Net Income (TTM) was 167. Pitney Bowes's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 444. ==> 444 > 167 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1874.967/3216.0022
=0.58301173

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1999.756/3699.2768
=0.54058026

Pitney Bowes's gearing of this year was 0.58301173. Pitney Bowes's gearing of last year was 0.54058026. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1129.35/1818.489
=0.62103758

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1184.889/1489.001
=0.79576105

Pitney Bowes's current ratio of this year was 0.62103758. Pitney Bowes's current ratio of last year was 0.79576105. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Pitney Bowes's number of shares in issue this year was 147.742. Pitney Bowes's number of shares in issue last year was 184.773. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1014.524/1876.622
=0.5406118

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1058.674/1998.749
=0.52966831

Pitney Bowes's gross margin of this year was 0.5406118. Pitney Bowes's gross margin of last year was 0.52966831. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=1876.622/3269.703
=0.57394265

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=1998.749/4103.047
=0.48713773

Pitney Bowes's asset turnover of this year was 0.57394265. Pitney Bowes's asset turnover of last year was 0.48713773. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+0+0+1+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Pitney Bowes has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 7 mean?
Pitney Bowes (PBI) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pitney Bowes and its competitors. This is 17% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Pitney Bowes' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Pitney Bowes ranks #129 out of 979 companies in the Transportation industry, placing it in the top 13.2%.
Is Pitney Bowes' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Pitney Bowes' current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Transportation industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Pitney Bowes' value of 7 is 16.7% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Pitney Bowes ranks #129 out of 979 companies in the Transportation industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Pitney Bowes has a GF Score™ of 58/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Pitney Bowes' Piotroski F-Score compare to HUBG and CYRX?
According to the Transportation industry distribution chart, Pitney Bowes ranks #129 out of 979 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Pitney Bowes in the top 13% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Pitney Bowes' value of 7 is 16.7% above this benchmark. Historically, Pitney Bowes' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, Pitney Bowes has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Transportation company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Transportation companies is 6.00, based on 979 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Pitney Bowes's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 16.7% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Pitney Bowes and its competitors. For the Transportation industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Pitney Bowes's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Pitney Bowes stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $7.57, compared to a current price of $17.48 — trading 130.9% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 16.7% above the Transportation industry median of 6.00. Pitney Bowes' overall GF Score™ is 58/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Pitney Bowes (PBI), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Pitney Bowes (PBI) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Pitney Bowes stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $17.48 is trading 130.9% above its estimated GF Value™ of $7.57. GuruFocus considers Pitney Bowes to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for PBI:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 7 (17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: $7.57 vs. price of $17.48 (130.9% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 58/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 16.7% above the Transportation median (#129 of 979)

No single metric tells the full story. See the PBI stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Pitney Bowes Business Description

Other Exchanges PBW:GermanyPBI:Argentina
Address 27 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT, USA, 06484
Pitney Bowes Inc is a technology-driven company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the globe. The company's reportable segments are SendTech Solutions and Presort Services. SendTech Solutions includes the revenue and related expenses from physical and digital mailing and shipping technology solutions, financing, services, supplies and other applications to help simplify and save on the sending, tracking and receiving of letters, parcels and flats. Presort Services includes the revenue and related expenses from sortation services to qualify large volumes of First Class Mail, Marketing Mail and Marketing Mail Flats/Bound Printed Matter for postal work sharing discounts. It derives maximum revenue from SendTech Solutions.
58GF Score

Get the complete analysis for PBI

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$17.48
Price
$7.57
GF Value