GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Healthcare » Medical Devices & Instruments » Beijing Succeeder Technology Inc (SHSE:688338) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Beijing Succeeder Technology (SHSE:688338) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of Apr. 22, 2025)


View and export this data going back to 2020. Start your Free Trial

What is Beijing Succeeder Technology Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Beijing Succeeder Technology has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SHSE:688338' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 6

During the past 8 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Beijing Succeeder Technology was 7. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.


Beijing Succeeder Technology Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Beijing Succeeder Technology Piotroski F-Score Chart

Beijing Succeeder Technology Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00

Beijing Succeeder Technology Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 6.00

Competitive Comparison of Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score

For the Medical Devices subindustry, Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Medical Devices & Instruments Industry

For the Medical Devices & Instruments industry and Healthcare sector, Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


;
;

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep24) TTM:Last Year (Sep23) TTM:
Net Income was 29.088 + 30.43 + 32.294 + 20.935 = ¥112.7 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 48.49 + 19.815 + 32.303 + 16.166 = ¥116.8 Mil.
Revenue was 71.212 + 75.819 + 83.211 + 67.496 = ¥297.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was 45.063 + 48.666 + 52.345 + 39.737 = ¥185.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep23)
to the end of this year (Sep24) was
(1645.149 + 1706.236 + 1722.952 + 1726.632 + 1725.94) / 5 = ¥1705.3818 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep23) was ¥1,645.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥0.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥1,369.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥89.6 Mil.
Net Income was 25.885 + 26.58 + 33.642 + 27.602 = ¥113.7 Mil.

Revenue was 64.567 + 66.764 + 74.717 + 62.794 = ¥268.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 40.084 + 41.173 + 47.561 + 39.472 = ¥168.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep22)
to the end of last year (Sep23) was
(1564.061 + 1612.007 + 1602.689 + 1645.817 + 1645.149) / 5 = ¥1613.9446 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep22) was ¥1,564.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥0.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥1,369.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥72.7 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Beijing Succeeder Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was 112.7. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Beijing Succeeder Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 116.8. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=112.747/1645.149
=0.068533

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=113.709/1564.061
=0.07270113

Beijing Succeeder Technology's return on assets of this year was 0.068533. Beijing Succeeder Technology's return on assets of last year was 0.07270113. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Beijing Succeeder Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was 112.7. Beijing Succeeder Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 116.8. ==> 116.8 > 112.7 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=0/1705.3818
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=0.108/1613.9446
=6.692E-5

Beijing Succeeder Technology's gearing of this year was 0. Beijing Succeeder Technology's gearing of last year was 6.692E-5. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1369.301/89.582
=15.28544797

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1369.247/72.682
=18.83887345

Beijing Succeeder Technology's current ratio of this year was 15.28544797. Beijing Succeeder Technology's current ratio of last year was 18.83887345. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Beijing Succeeder Technology's number of shares in issue this year was 105.07. Beijing Succeeder Technology's number of shares in issue last year was 106.133. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=185.811/297.738
=0.62407553

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=168.29/268.842
=0.62598106

Beijing Succeeder Technology's gross margin of this year was 0.62407553. Beijing Succeeder Technology's gross margin of last year was 0.62598106. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep23)
=297.738/1645.149
=0.18097935

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep22)
=268.842/1564.061
=0.17188716

Beijing Succeeder Technology's asset turnover of this year was 0.18097935. Beijing Succeeder Technology's asset turnover of last year was 0.17188716. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Beijing Succeeder Technology has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Beijing Succeeder Technology  (SHSE:688338) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Beijing Succeeder Technology Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Beijing Succeeder Technology's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Beijing Succeeder Technology Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Innovation Road, No. 1, Xingchang Road, Block 1A, No. 27, Science and Technology Park, 3rd Floor, Building 1, Changping District, East District, East District, Beijing, CHN, 102200
Beijing Succeeder Technology Inc is engaged in production and sales of detection instruments, reagents and consumables in the field of in vitro diagnosis of thrombosis and hemostasis. The company develops, manufactures and sells in-vitro diagnostic products including coagulation analyzers and reagents, blood rheology analyzers, ESR analyzers and platelet aggregation analyzers. Its product portfolio includes Fully Auto Coagulation Analyzer; Semi Auto Coagulation Analyzer; ESR Analyzer; Platelet Aggregation Analyzer; and Coagulation Reagents.
Executives
Le Jia Min Core technical personnel
Yu Song Yan Core technical personnel
Li Gang Core technical personnel
Zhang Ying Supervisors
Liang Yun Bo Core technical personnel
Zhang Jia Hong senior management
Li Guo Directors, senior managers
Ding Zhong Hui Directors, senior managers, core technical personn
Gu Xiao Feng Directors, senior managers
Wu Tong Director
Wu Shi Ming Director
Pei Yan Bin senior management
Wang Xiao Qing Supervisors
Zhang Chao Hui Director

Beijing Succeeder Technology Headlines

No Headlines