SOWG (Sow Good) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — Near Median


SOWG Sow Good Inc SOWG
39 GF Score
Price $2.74
GF Value $2.65
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Sow Good Piotroski F-Score?

Sow Good SOWG +5.38% 39 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates SOWG with a GF Score™ of 39/100 and a GF Value™ of $2.65 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,911 Consumer Packaged Goods companies, Sow Good ranks worse than 66.93% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sow Good has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SOWG' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1   Med: 4   Max: 8
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Sow Good was 8. The lowest was 1. And the median was 4.

Sow Good  (NAS:SOWG) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Sow Good Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Sow Good Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Sow Good Piotroski F-Score Chart

Sow Good Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00

Sow Good Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00

SOWG vs RMCF, MDLZ, HSY: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Confectioners subindustry, Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Sow Good Piotroski F-Score vs Consumer Packaged Goods Industry

For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


SOWG
39GF Score
Sow Good Inc SOWG
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -4.187 + -10.935 + -22.948 + -2.49 = $-40.56 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.514 + -0.82 + -0.97 + -1.69 = $-3.99 Mil.
Revenue was 1.856 + 1.553 + -5.886 + 0 = $-2.48 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.13 + -8.947 + 7.974 + 0 = $-1.10 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(52.723 + 49.985 + 25.571 + 3.775 + 3.046) / 5 = $27.02 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $52.72 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.15 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.96 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $4.35 Mil.
Net Income was 3.335 + -3.38 + -4.168 + -2.754 = $-6.97 Mil.

Revenue was 15.648 + 3.554 + -30.609 + 0 = $-11.41 Mil.
Gross Profit was 9.007 + 0.556 + -1.218 + 0 = $8.35 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(27.903 + 60.19 + 57.668 + 54.696 + 52.723) / 5 = $50.636 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $27.90 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $15.18 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $24.63 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $6.75 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sow Good's current Net Income (TTM) was -40.56. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Sow Good's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.99. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-40.56/52.723
=-0.76930372

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-6.967/27.903
=-0.24968641

Sow Good's return on assets of this year was -0.76930372. Sow Good's return on assets of last year was -0.24968641. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Sow Good's current Net Income (TTM) was -40.56. Sow Good's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -3.99. ==> -3.99 > -40.56 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=0.15/27.02
=0.00555144

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=15.183/50.636
=0.29984596

Sow Good's gearing of this year was 0.00555144. Sow Good's gearing of last year was 0.29984596. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.956/4.347
=0.6800092

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=24.626/6.751
=3.64775589

Sow Good's current ratio of this year was 0.6800092. Sow Good's current ratio of last year was 3.64775589. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Sow Good's number of shares in issue this year was 20.12. Sow Good's number of shares in issue last year was 0.757. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-1.103/-2.477
=0.44529673

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=8.345/-11.407
=-0.73156834

Sow Good's gross margin of this year was 0.44529673. Sow Good's gross margin of last year was -0.73156834. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=-2.477/52.723
=-0.04698139

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=-11.407/27.903
=-0.40880909

Sow Good's asset turnover of this year was -0.04698139. Sow Good's asset turnover of last year was -0.40880909. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+1+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Sow Good has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Sow Good (SOWG) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Sow Good and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Sow Good ranks #1279 out of 1911 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, placing it in the top 66.9%.
Is Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Sow Good's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is near median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 1.00 to a high of 8.00. The Consumer Packaged Goods industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Sow Good's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Sow Good ranks #1279 out of 1911 companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Sow Good has a GF Score™ of 39/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Sow Good's Piotroski F-Score compare to RMCF and MDLZ?
According to the Consumer Packaged Goods industry distribution chart, Sow Good ranks #1279 out of 1911 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Sow Good in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Sow Good's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Sow Good's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 1.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Sow Good has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Consumer Packaged Goods company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Consumer Packaged Goods companies is 5.00, based on 1,911 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Sow Good's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Sow Good and its competitors. For the Consumer Packaged Goods industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Sow Good's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Sow Good stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Sow Good (SOWG) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $2.65, compared to a current price of $2.74 — trading 3.4% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is near median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 20% below the Consumer Packaged Goods industry median of 5.00. Sow Good's overall GF Score™ is 39/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Sow Good (SOWG), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Sow Good (SOWG) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Sow Good stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $2.74 is trading 3.4% above its estimated GF Value™ of $2.65. GuruFocus considers Sow Good to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for SOWG:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (near median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $2.65 vs. price of $2.74 (3.4% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 39/100 with 2 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Consumer Packaged Goods median (#1279 of 1911)

No single metric tells the full story. See the SOWG stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Sow Good Business Description

Address 1440 North Union Bower Road, Irving, TX, USA, 75061
Sow Good Inc is engaged in manufacturing and marketing freeze-dried fruits, vegetables, snacks, smoothies, and soups. The company also sells gluten-free products under the Sow Good brand. The company is developing a freeze-dried candy market and snack manufacturing to provide consumers with flavorful freeze-dried treats. The company operates in one reportable segment, reflecting its capital-light business model under which it earns proceeds from the sale of freeze-dried candy products.
39GF Score

Get the complete analysis for SOWG

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$2.74
Price
$2.65
GF Value